Crunchy Con

Chaput and Bernanos

Tuesday April 24, 2007

Archbishop Chaput has written the most important thing you will read today. I cannot say enough good things about this talk and its significance. It explores Kirk's view that conservatism is built on a fundamental recognition that the material order rests on a spiritual foundation. Excerpts:

Only one question really matters. Does God exist or not? If he does, that has implications for every aspect of our personal and public behavior: all of our actions, all of our choices, all of our decisions. If God exists, denying him in our public life—whether we do it explicitly like Nietzsche or implicitly by our silence—cannot serve the common good, because it amounts to worshiping the unreal in the place of the real.
[snip]
But Americans now face the same growing spiritual illness that J.R.R. Tolkien, G.K. Chesterton, Christopher Dawson, Romano Guardini, and C.S. Lewis all wrote about in the last century. It’s a loss of hope and purpose that comes from the loss of an interior life and a living faith. It’s a loss that we can only make bearable by creating a culture of material comfort that feeds—and feeds off of—personal selfishness.

Religious believers built this country. Christians played a leading role in that work. This is a fact, not an opinion. Our entire framework of human rights is based on a religious understanding of the dignity of the human person as a child of his or her Creator.


The archbishop is making the point that in our attempt to exile God from public discussion -- such as the effort launched today in Washington by religious progressives seeking to marginalize the orthodox religious perspective from public health practics as "sectarian" -- is an ideologically motivated campaign that is not true to American history, and worse, that's a betrayal of metaphysical truth. He goes on to talk about the final essays of the French Catholic writer Georges Bernanos, and what Bernanos had to say about the signs of the times:

Regnery published the lectures in English in 1955 as The Last Essays of Georges Bernanos.[N.B., it's out of print, but Alibris.com has a couple of copies left; I just ordered one. -- RD] I hope you’ll read them for yourselves. They’re outstanding. Bernanos had an unblinkered vision of the “signs of the times.” Remember that, just after the Second World War, France experienced a Catholic revival. Recovering from a global conflict and the Holocaust, the world in general and France in particular seemed to turn back—briefly—to essentials. It was during that hopeful season that the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council gave us Gaudium et Spes.

But Bernanos always saw the problems beneath the veneer. He wasn’t fooled by the apparent revival of Catholic France. And so his work is a great corrective to the myth that our moral confusion started in the 1960s. As Bernanos makes clear, our problems began with the machine age—the industrial revolution—but not simply because of machines. They were the fruit of a “de-spiritualization” that had been going on for some time.

Bernanos argues that the optimism of the modern West is a kind of whistling past the graveyard. The Christian virtue of hope, he reminds us, is a hard and strong thing that disciplines and “perfects” human appetites. It has nothing to do with mere optimism. Real Christian hope comes into play as the obstacles to human happiness seem to grow higher.

Bernanos takes it upon himself to show us just how high the obstacles to real human freedom have become, even in liberal democracies. He argues that our modern optimism is a veneer over a despair bred by our greed and materialism. We try to fool ourselves that everything will turn out for the best, despite all the evidence to the contrary—crime, terrorism, disease, poverty—and we even concoct a myth of inevitable progress to shore up our optimism. American optimism in particular—Bernanos refers to the United States bitterly as “the Rome, the Mecca, the holiest sanctuary of this civilization”—is really only the eager restlessness of unsatisfied appetites.

Two themes dominate these last essays by Bernanos. The first is man’s eagerness to abolish, forget, or rewrite his own history in favor of determinisms like liberal capitalism, which makes society nothing more than a market system, and Marxism. For Bernanos, the attack on human memory and history is a primary mark of the Antichrist.

As Bernanos explains it, big ideological systems “mechanize” history with high-sounding language like progress and dialectics. But in doing so, they wipe out the importance of both the past—which they describe as primitive, unenlightened, or counterrevolutionary—and the present, which is not yet the paradise of tomorrow. The future is where salvation is to be found for every ideology that tries to eliminate God, whether it’s explicitly atheistic or pays lip service to religious values. Of course, this future never arrives, because progress never stops and the dialectic never ends.

Christianity and Judaism see life very differently.


If I quoted everything vital and liberating that Abp Chaput said in this essay, which began as a speech he delivered last week in Philadelphia, I'd quote the whole thing. Just go to the First Things site and read it yourself. One more bit:

The “common good” is more than a political slogan. It’s more than what most people think they want right now. It’s not a matter of popular consensus or majority opinion. It can’t be reduced to economic justice or social equality or better laws or civil rights, although all these things are vitally important to a healthy society.

The common good is what best serves human happiness in the light of what is real and true. That’s the heart of the matter: What is real and true? If God exists, then the more man flees from God, the less true and real man becomes. If God exists, then a society that refuses to acknowledge or publicly talk about God is suffering from a peculiar kind of insanity.


That, readers, is what is called speaking truth to the Powers that Be. God bless the Catholic Archbishop of Denver for his words. As the battle lines become clearer and clearer, we are going to need prophetic voices like his.
Comments
wildwest
April 26, 2007 6:52 PM
HASH(0x9819a94)

Did I do that?

Cleveland
April 26, 2007 11:12 PM
HASH(0x981a14c)

"Wow, what a lively debate. I heartily commend the posters here for disagreeing and continuing to engage one another so contructively. What a breath of fresh air it is. I mostly read jaybird, M_David, and Starrs. Thanks. Dave G " Dave, I couldn't agree more. There is a religion blog I used to enjoy, but the bitterness, incivility and precious little discussion of religion became painful.

Dave G
April 27, 2007 2:41 PM
HASH(0x981d1b4)

Cleveland, You might also like Maclin Horton's blog. Posters there manage to wrestle with Religion AND politics without getting ugly. Imagine that. http://www.lightondarkwater.com/blog/index.html

Joseph D'Hippolito
April 30, 2007 2:19 AM
HASH(0x981d19c)

To Ben and mEz: If you insert Chaput's ellipsis into his original comments, you don't get anything substantially different from the remarks I quoted. The word "but" effectively nullifies everything Chaput said in his elliptical comments -- which were nothing more than a superficial, condescending nod to those who disagreed with him. I stand by my original post on this matter.

Anonymous
January 31, 2008 11:44 AM

you are STUPID!!!

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement