Crunchy Con

Love and Dope

Friday August 25, 2006

Our combox pal Michael Blowhard makes a great find from the celebrated art critic Robert Hughes (whose book "Barcelona" is one of my favorites), writing here about the damage the Sixties -- his Sixties -- did to him and his wife and child. Read this excerpt -- but the whole piece is an extraordinary tale of life on another planet. The very last paragraph, where he tells what happened to his son, is heart-stoppingly sad. But this take on the Sixties is the philosophical gist of his piece:

It was a time of collective self-importance, which masked — not very effectively — a striking indifference to the way the world actually did and might work. I hardly met a single person in the “underground” context who didn’t, no matter how sexually available or amusing, turn out in the end to be ignorant and rather a bore.

The depths of tedium that can be plumbed by sitting around half stoned, listening to people chatter moonily about reuniting humankind and erasing its aggressive instincts through Love and Dope, are scarcely imaginable to those who have not suffered them.


I went through a stupid infatuation with the Sixties for a couple of years in college. Came to an abrupt halt when I finally met my hero, Abbie Hoffman, whose visit to campus I'd helped arrange. I was his handler. Radicalism was just a shtick for him by that point. He was late for his lecture; I found him in his room on the phone with his bookie back in NYC. He told me he had more riding on the Mets game that night than we were paying him to speak (which was thousand$). After his off-the-cuff talk, telling adventures tales from the hallowed Sixties, we repaired to a bar with members of the Progressive Students Network, the campus leftie group. Abbie proceeded to eat a handful of pills and wash them down with pitcher upon pitcher of beer. Later, he asked me to take him to a place where he could meet a woman for sex -- but he put it so crudely that it shocked me, a good little liberal idealist, that he was such a sexist.

We ended up the night drunk, driving around the Jimmy Swaggart Bible College campus, yelling out the window like idiots. The Jimmy Swaggart Bible Police stopped us, and the guy who was driving had to try to talk him out of having us arrested for trespassing, which we certainly were. Abbie leans out the window and bellows drunkenly to the security guard, "I'll have you know that if you arrest us, I'll have it on the front page of the New York Times tomorrow morning."

The rent-a-cop, to his everlasting credit, drawled, "Mister, I don't care who you are, get back in the car and shut your mouth."

He let us go. We dropped Abbie off back at the place where he was staying, in luxury campus housing for special guests of the university. He ended up smoking dope that night there with some nut from the PSN, and nearly missed his flight the next morning. A few days later, I heard from a friend at Penn, I believe it was, that Abbie Hoffman had just been there speaking, straight from his appearance at LSU, where according to Abbie the students were too afraid to stand up to that fascist Jimmy Swaggart.

Abbie Hoffman overdosed on pills two or three years later. The Wikipedia entry on him says Hoffman "has remained a symbol of the youth rebellion of that decade." Yep.
Comments
Tom Tomberg
August 28, 2006 5:38 PM
http://youtube.com/watch?v=HgEzfDDyBHM

Michael writes: "I mean, there were some cool and fun things about the '60s, and some awful, over-the-top, we're-still-paying-for-them things about the '60s. Both facts are true."

Dead on.

Rod writes: "As far as I'm concerned, "the Sixties" runs from the day the Civil Rights Act of 1964 was signed, ending the crime of legal segregation, until Reagan was elected in 1980."

Yes, that period of liberal tyranny, the Nixon administration. Why do conservatives get such jollies out of piling hate on these people who made a bunch of noise 40 years ago and could never win an election for dog catcher?

I'll admit the possibility that Abbie Hoffman is boring to me for the same reason that Jerry Falwell and James Dobson are boring to Jonah Goldberg-- that he reflects an aspect of my movement/party that I'd prefer to ignore. I submit that the people Jonah ignores have much, much more influence among party insiders, and a much wider following, than Hoffman ever did.

Also, you should check out http://itunes.stanford.edu/

There is a terrific lecture there by Prof. Gay, I think, on the unusual unanimity of party affiliation among blacks. When blacks live in areas that provide effective social services, that unanimity begins to break down. Interesting empirics that seem to be relevant to the caricature of multiculturalism that inflames you so.

Liberals don't forget that the 1950s was a great time for letters-- liberals are always reading Ginsburg, Kerouac, et al. Conservatives prefer to indulge the powerful, and spend their time spewing spite at the politically powerless pro-free-love bloc.

David White: You are right. Substitute "came to fruition and acceptance" for "took root.">

SiliconValleySteve
August 28, 2006 6:17 PM

For a picture of the worst that the 60's counterculture had to offer let me recommend the recent biography of Timothy Leary by former Rolling Stone writer Robert Greenfield. From start-to-finish Leary was an egomaniac who destroyed the lives of those he encountered including his 1st wife who committed suicide, his daughter who committed suicide. His son was only able to save himself from Tim by removing himself completely from his life. Poetess Diane DiPrima and jazz musician Maynard Ferguson dosed their young children on LSD weekly in the house in Millbrook, NY where Leary presided. There were many other children at Millbrook who were treated the same way. The author in a rare personal opinion within the text of the book compared the children who lived there to the survivors of Auschwitz concentration camp. Considering all of the 60's luminaries who traveled through Millbrook (the book names many) concerned with human rights, none were concerned enough to protect these children.

Contrary to what some will want to say here, Leary was and remains an honored elder of the 60's counter-culture. Near the end of his life, the hollywood liberals Tim Robbins and Susan Sarandon arranged for him to accept an award for humanitarion of the year at a dinner attended by Art Linkletter whose daughter was destroyed by the drugs that Leary promoted.

Linkletter, a far better man than those who mocked him refrained from comment seeing the pathetic wretch that Leary had become as a result of the life he had led as pied-piper of the 60's counter-culture.>

tovart
August 28, 2006 7:35 PM

Keep fighting that good fight? What a calling! I can t tell what is more significant -- bashing the ell out of the sixties and liberals, allocating credit for the civil rights movements, or the war on non-procreative sex!>

Bab
August 29, 2006 6:05 AM

I know Hugh's son's wife. Suicides in this part of the world are so common that they are not reported in the news for fear they will inspire 'copycats', or just depressed people to take the same step. Still they are broadcast by word of mouth, just as Danton's was here.

Certainly Danton's mother holds much of the blame for what happened to him, but the whole thing is just weird.

And what's with today's wimpy 'kids'? My father's generation had no shoes or food. He and his brothers weren't even allowed to eat the scraps they were given in the house, only on the back porch with the dogs. The eldest went on to pilot a bomber in WWII and they all had happy lives and successful careers. So what's with the 60's generation?>

tovart
August 29, 2006 7:12 PM

Just be thankful that birth control was available back then. Just think if all that sex going on was strictly for Procreation and that generation was allowed to breed. You might still have to bitch about the "Sixties" generation today, in 2006.>

Read All Comments

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Please type the text you see in the box below to verify your post and help us prevent spam.

Type the characters you see in the picture above.

Advertisement

Search This Blog

About Crunchy Con

Rod Dreher is an editorial columnist for the Dallas Morning News, and author of "Crunchy Cons" (Crown Forum), a nonfiction book about conservatives, most of them religious, whose faith and political convictions sometimes put them at odds with mainstream conservatives. The views expressed in this blog are his own.

feed icon Subscribe

RSS Feed

Receive updates from Crunchy Con

About Beliefnet

Our mission is to help people like you find, and walk, a spiritual path that will bring comfort, hope, clarity, strength, and happiness. More about Beliefnet.

Legal

Copyright © Beliefnet, Inc. and/or its licensors. All rights reserved. Use of this site is subject to Terms of Service and to our Privacy Policy. Constructed by Beliefnet.

Advertisement