Around this Christmas, I received review copies of Visions of the Future and other important Lifeboat Foundation books.

Primarily collections of essays authored by other Lifeboat Foundation members (compare to my own main futurist work, the pocket-size Catalyst thesis that you can read in a day) those books can be immense and cover a wide variety of topics. As a result, my reviews will be directed mainly at a smaller selection of authors and essayists who contributed to these books at the Foundation.

My futurism focuses on the idea that science and technology have a great responsibility not just for what they do but for what they fail to do. They should not be used to the exclusive benefit of one nation-state or a few, but should uplift the entire globe. It is an accepted aspect of enlightenment, the highest cosmopolitan virtue, to believe that the lives and pleasures of my neighbour or I are no more important than those of anyone else anywhere else in the world.

Unless the benefits of science and technology are duly and equally shared among all people, with maximum attention to decentralisation and the equal treatment of all states and cultures, these benefits ought not to be recognised at all. I would then offer no futurist vision other than to say the future is lost. In fact, most so-called benefits would only in fact be supporting hegemony, poverty and injustice and further bloating the sense of legitimacy of a privileged few if they were not adequately or promptly circulated.

This idea of total equality in human development is central to my Catalyst thesis and it is central to my recent post about thermonuclear fusion energy. It can be expected to inform my upcoming book reviews of those immense collected works sent to me by the think tank this Christmas.

More from Beliefnet and our partners
previous posts

Americans are overwhelmingly polarized over ongoing presidential election campaigns. The choice is going to be between Donald Trump – an oligarch accused of disregarding the interests of minorities, and Hillary Clinton – an utterly disgraced public servant too unqualified and incompetent to even serve at the lowest possible grade in the US State Department. But, between the two, one has already clearly […]

Whatever you may think of it, everyone – politicians most of all – must respect the Brexit vote. The British people are not a bunch of children who need to be stood in the corner by know-it-all politicians because they voted “wrong”. They have voted, albeit by a slim margin, to no longer be part of the European Union. As far […]

In my experience (oh the irony…), there is a battle of experience vs knowledge. As someone who studied International Relations at university, but has little to no political experience or travel history abroad, I may seem like someone right out of an ivory tower. This would be a good ad hominem against me in a […]

Immanuel Wallerstein asserted in a recent post that the gap between American power and political rhetoric is growing. This can be related to the the Syrian problem at the heart of current US foreign policy. The US is no longer the dominant power in the world. However, it refuses to accept this, International Relations expert Wallerstein wrote at the start of June. […]