Une société sans religion est comme un vaisseau sans boussole

A society without religion is like a ship without a compass

Napoleon Bonaparte

Should anti-racists condemn Black racism (where it can legitimately be proven to exist) against white people?

Above: historic defiance: an African American woman defies state authorities by taking down the Confederate flag

My simplest answer is no, don’t bother.

This post continues from my previous foreign policy commentary on Third Worldism vs. neoconservative ideology.

It is absolutely not hypocritical that we condemn white racists while viewing Black racists (for example, America’s Malcolm X or Algeria’s Frantz Fanon himself) as liberators. Nor is it hypocritical that we spell white without a capital while we spell Black with a capital. It is not hypocritical if everyone will hate White Pride and love Black Pride. On the contrary, all symbols and rhetoric referring to Black liberation are emancipatory: these speak of a people that has been chained and oppressed and still languishes in the oppressive American prison system. All symbols and rhetoric referring to White nationalism or White Pride are displays of indulgent reactionary behavior by a culture that has enjoyed privilege and supremacy and tries desperately to sustain it. The rhetoric of liberation is right no matter how ugly or guttural it is, and the rhetoric of reaction is wrong no matter how attractive or sanitized it is.

By the same token, feel free to celebrate the cause of indigenous Pakistani or Iranian nationalism, or Syrian nationalism, or Palestinian nationalism, and continue to separately condemn the vile and reactionary nationalism of settler regimes such as Israel or the United States. One category of nationalisms and power ideologies is absolved because these nationalisms and power ideologies are pursued in the causes of non-white or Third World liberation. The other category is intellectually vapid, false, and serves no cause of liberation but the perpetuation of misery and oppression.

To put it another way, there is no valid American or Western exceptionalism but the exceptionalism of the other – the exceptionalism of the oppressed and disenfranchised who are right no matter what evil they are accused of. That is an exceptionalism that I accept and help to cultivate with every fiber of my being.

By Harry J. Bentham

HJB Signature and stamp

More from Beliefnet and our partners
previous posts

Americans are overwhelmingly polarized over ongoing presidential election campaigns. The choice is going to be between Donald Trump – an oligarch accused of disregarding the interests of minorities, and Hillary Clinton – an utterly disgraced public servant too unqualified and incompetent to even serve at the lowest possible grade in the US State Department. But, between the two, one has already clearly […]

Whatever you may think of it, everyone – politicians most of all – must respect the Brexit vote. The British people are not a bunch of children who need to be stood in the corner by know-it-all politicians because they voted “wrong”. They have voted, albeit by a slim margin, to no longer be part of the European Union. As far […]

In my experience (oh the irony…), there is a battle of experience vs knowledge. As someone who studied International Relations at university, but has little to no political experience or travel history abroad, I may seem like someone right out of an ivory tower. This would be a good ad hominem against me in a […]

Immanuel Wallerstein asserted in a recent post that the gap between American power and political rhetoric is growing. This can be related to the the Syrian problem at the heart of current US foreign policy. The US is no longer the dominant power in the world. However, it refuses to accept this, International Relations expert Wallerstein wrote at the start of June. […]