City of Brass

City of Brass


Shari’a versus the Taleban in Swat

posted by Aziz Poonawalla

Shari’a law is (by definition) a system for rule of Law. It may not be the kind of Law that Westerners would want to be ruled by, but it is a system of Law nevertheless. Therefore, in a very simple yet fundamental way, Shari’a is an anathema to the might-makes-right oppression of gangs and warlords, of which the Taleban are a fine example. This is why Shari’a (and all other religiously-derived Law) exists – to protect a population from anarchy and exploitation of the weak by the strong.

Of course, in the hands of those very same thugs and warlords, Shari’a itself can be twisted to serve their ends. This is precsely what Islamic extremists like the Taleban, or the ruling theocracy in Iran, or the religious establishment in Saudi Arabia, have done. They subvert Shari’a to become an instrument for the oppression of the very people it was meant to protect.

However, the embrace of Shari’a Law in this way is a double-edged sword, because by using it, these forces of anarchy are implicitly legitimizing Law rather than their own raw power as a source of authority. And as the Taleban are finding out in Swat, the Law can take on a life of its own. The Shari’a courts in Swat, installed by the Taleban’s demand, are proving to be not as compliant as the Taleban warlords had assumed:

The “Taleban case” before the court vividly illustrates this.

It pertains to the creation of a dirt track through the fields of a local farmer at the behest of the Taleban.

The farmer filed a case in the Sharia courts and the matter was adjudicated by Maulana Rahman.

The ruling was in the farmer’s favour.

“But the members of the Taleban present refused to accept the
verdict and said they would take up the matter with senior Taleban
commanders,” an eyewitness says.

“They also twisted the judge’s words and brought in the
commander after telling him that Maulana Rahman had said that he did
not care if Maulana Fazlullah himself had demanded a repeal.”

Maulana Fazlullah is head of the Taleban in the Swat region. His power is said to be absolute.

The clearly incensed Taleban commander demanded an explanation from Maulana Rahman.

The qazi made it clear he had not made any such comments.

But he also reiterated the fact that the ruling was final.

For several minutes, the Taleban commander and his henchmen continued to argue.

But Maulana Rahman refused to budge, and fellow qazis waded into the argument in his support.

Finally, they managed to convince the Taleban after quoting examples supporting the decision from the Koran.

They also said they would personally come and investigate the matter if the ruling was not followed.

At this, the Taleban agreed to the decision and beat a hasty retreat.

“This a system that works for us,” says Qari Fazal Maula, a petitioner at the court.

This is delicious irony indeed, but also a positive development worth celebrating. Once Law is established as the authority, it can be changed, and the trend in history has always been for Law to grow more and more liberal, especially as information technology and trade open a region to influences beyond its domestic sphere. Even in Afghanistan, the Taleban are unable to stop technology from infiltrating the society – and they don’t want to, being hooked on it themselves.



  • Zafar

    It also means the garmer was brave enough to go to court. esp a court installed by the Taleban.
    I hope there are more like him.

  • Abambagibus

    It reminds me of the time when the brave stood up against the mob for its imposition of an injustice, present or future, and found themselves dead. I pray that the farmer is truly protected by the will of the Taleban to acquiesce to the Truth to which they declaratively aspire. Otherwise their declarations are a farce.

Previous Posts

Video: (muslim) Mehdi Hasan interviews (atheist) Richard Dawkins at the Oxford Union
This is an excellent debate between the most emphatic atheist of our time, Richard Dawkins, and political journalist Mehdi Hasan. Hasan is brilliantly prepared for the debate and treats Dawkins with utmost respect, but methodically defends belief and religion as a force for good. https://www.you

posted 11:46:28am Apr. 08, 2014 | read full post »

Two Bohras come to aid of Frenchwoman attacked in Mumbai
In the past two months I've traveled to India three times, to attend the funeral and other events after the passing of Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin (ra). This quite shocking story happened in the Fort area of Mumbai, which is quite close to where I spent much of my time and is considered one of the b

posted 6:20:59pm Mar. 18, 2014 | read full post »

Amidst the grief, solace in the succession of Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin
This is a guest post by Durriya Badani The forty day period of mourning has now elapsed, but the profound sadness at the loss of the beloved head of the Dawoodi Bohra community, a spiritual mo

posted 9:48:33am Mar. 16, 2014 | read full post »

NYPD's illegal spying on Muslims was legal, says legal system
This is profoundly disappointing but not entirely unexpected: In a decision filed Thursday in federal court in Newark, U.S. District Judge William Martini dismisse

posted 12:44:10pm Feb. 21, 2014 | read full post »

Valentine's Day and Islam - the virtues of mohabbat (love)
Happy Valentine's Day! I am biased towards appreciating Valentine's Day not just for it's Gujarati origins but also because it's my birthday. However, not all Muslims share my appreciation. Here's a typical example: In its official Friday sermon text distributed to mosques in the Muslim-major

posted 6:04:27am Feb. 14, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.