City of Brass

City of Brass

Shari’a versus the Taleban in Swat

Shari’a law is (by definition) a system for rule of Law. It may not be the kind of Law that Westerners would want to be ruled by, but it is a system of Law nevertheless. Therefore, in a very simple yet fundamental way, Shari’a is an anathema to the might-makes-right oppression of gangs and warlords, of which the Taleban are a fine example. This is why Shari’a (and all other religiously-derived Law) exists – to protect a population from anarchy and exploitation of the weak by the strong.

Of course, in the hands of those very same thugs and warlords, Shari’a itself can be twisted to serve their ends. This is precsely what Islamic extremists like the Taleban, or the ruling theocracy in Iran, or the religious establishment in Saudi Arabia, have done. They subvert Shari’a to become an instrument for the oppression of the very people it was meant to protect.


However, the embrace of Shari’a Law in this way is a double-edged sword, because by using it, these forces of anarchy are implicitly legitimizing Law rather than their own raw power as a source of authority. And as the Taleban are finding out in Swat, the Law can take on a life of its own. The Shari’a courts in Swat, installed by the Taleban’s demand, are proving to be not as compliant as the Taleban warlords had assumed:

The “Taleban case” before the court vividly illustrates this.

It pertains to the creation of a dirt track through the fields of a local farmer at the behest of the Taleban.


The farmer filed a case in the Sharia courts and the matter was adjudicated by Maulana Rahman.

The ruling was in the farmer’s favour.

“But the members of the Taleban present refused to accept the
verdict and said they would take up the matter with senior Taleban
commanders,” an eyewitness says.

“They also twisted the judge’s words and brought in the
commander after telling him that Maulana Rahman had said that he did
not care if Maulana Fazlullah himself had demanded a repeal.”

Maulana Fazlullah is head of the Taleban in the Swat region. His power is said to be absolute.

The clearly incensed Taleban commander demanded an explanation from Maulana Rahman.


The qazi made it clear he had not made any such comments.

But he also reiterated the fact that the ruling was final.

For several minutes, the Taleban commander and his henchmen continued to argue.

But Maulana Rahman refused to budge, and fellow qazis waded into the argument in his support.

Finally, they managed to convince the Taleban after quoting examples supporting the decision from the Koran.

They also said they would personally come and investigate the matter if the ruling was not followed.

At this, the Taleban agreed to the decision and beat a hasty retreat.

“This a system that works for us,” says Qari Fazal Maula, a petitioner at the court.

This is delicious irony indeed, but also a positive development worth celebrating. Once Law is established as the authority, it can be changed, and the trend in history has always been for Law to grow more and more liberal, especially as information technology and trade open a region to influences beyond its domestic sphere. Even in Afghanistan, the Taleban are unable to stop technology from infiltrating the society – and they don’t want to, being hooked on it themselves.

Comments read comments(2)
post a comment

posted March 27, 2009 at 6:16 pm

It also means the garmer was brave enough to go to court. esp a court installed by the Taleban.
I hope there are more like him.

report abuse


posted March 30, 2009 at 4:06 pm

It reminds me of the time when the brave stood up against the mob for its imposition of an injustice, present or future, and found themselves dead. I pray that the farmer is truly protected by the will of the Taleban to acquiesce to the Truth to which they declaratively aspire. Otherwise their declarations are a farce.

report abuse

Previous Posts

Deen and Mohabbat: There is no faith without love
This is a guest post by Yusuf Zakir. My religion--Islam--is discussed and portrayed in the media quite a lot these days, much to my chagrin. The American public is, generally, fearful of Muslims. Anti-Islamic sentiment is at an all-time ...

posted 10:10:30pm Oct. 07, 2015 | read full post »

nationwide hate rallies planned at mosques Oct 9-10, Homeland Security conf call
This weekend, there is a planned, armed protest "in every country, at every mosque" by a group called the "Global Rally for Humanity". So far, the protests are falling short of global, but they do have 21 mosques, community centers and ...

posted 1:40:08pm Oct. 06, 2015 | read full post »

why don't they condemn?
Ever since 9-11, and well before it, this is the litany of accusation that ordinary Muslim Americans have had to endure: Muslims do not condemn - there is no million Muslim march against terrorism. Islam is an inherently violent ...

posted 1:47:45pm Oct. 02, 2015 | read full post »

a Republican, Muslim Mayor of St Louis?
Umar Lee is many things - a native ...

posted 1:09:57am Sep. 30, 2015 | read full post »

Abrahamic Convergence - inspiration, forgiveness, and tragedy
This week is a truly portentous one for Muslims, Jews, and Catholics. In one week, we have Yom Kippur, the Day of Arafat and Eid ul Adha, and Pope Francis' first visit to the United States. I like the term "Abrahamic Convergence" for this sort ...

posted 3:08:38pm Sep. 24, 2015 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.