They will take effect May 3, 2001, one year from the date of the Vatican decree of ``recognition'' or approval.
Bishop Joseph A. Fiorenza of Galveston-Houston, NCCB president, said the purpose of the U.S. norms ``is, above all, to strengthen our Catholic colleges and universities, especially by helping them to maintain their Catholic identity.''
However, critics say the norms endanger academic freedom and government funding.
The bishops approved the norms at their general meeting last November in a document titled ```Ex Corde Ecclesiae': An Application to the United States.''
The Latin part of that title, which means ``from the heart of the church,'' comes from the name of Pope John Paul II's 1990 apostolic constitution on Catholic higher education.
The papal document set out a vision of the mission and role of Catholic institutes of higher learning and established general norms applicable to such institutions worldwide. It called on bishops' conferences to develop more specific applications of the papal text to the situation of Catholic colleges and universities in their own countries.
In a statement sent to bishops June 1 and released Wednesday, Fiorenza said the yearlong period before the U.S. application takes effect will be used to resolve questions and deal with ``practical matters of implementation.''
During that time, he said, ``the issues behind many of these inquiries will be addressed in dialogue with college and university presidents, theologians and canonists.''
The application discusses the theological and pastoral principles of the role of Catholic institutions of higher learning in the life of the church and the civic community.
It says what Catholic identity means for those institutions and spells out ways in which that Catholic identity and inspiration is to be nurtured in a university's foundational documents, board, administration, faculty and student body, in campus life, service to others and academics, research and interaction with culture.
It speaks of the collaboration, mutual trust and ongoing dialogue that must mark the relationship between the university and church authorities.
Throughout years of development of the U.S. application, one of the most vigorously debated issues was how to apply in the U.S. context the general church law that theology professors need a ``mandatum,'' or mandate to teach, from the competent ecclesiastical authority, the diocesan bishop.
Participants in the debate struggled to achieve a delicate balance of institutional autonomy for the university, academic freedom for its professors and the right and responsibility of the bishop to safeguard the faithful teaching of Catholic doctrine to the people of God in his diocese.
The Vatican approved the principles the bishops adopted for the ``mandatum''--including their theological and legal description of what it is and is not and their principle that ordinarily once a theologian has received a ``mandatum'' it goes with him, even if he takes up a new post in a different diocese.
The ``mandatum,'' as described in the norms:
In a footnote to the norm on how the ``mandatum'' is to be construed, the document says that ``it is not the responsibility of a Catholic university to seek the `mandatum'; this is a personal obligation of each professor.''
It adds, ``If a particular professor lacks a `mandatum' and continues to teach a theological discipline, the university must determine what further action may be taken in accordance with its own mission and statutes.''
The norms also discuss the process by which a `mandatum' is granted, denied or removed.
They say the bishop of the diocese where the institution is located is the competent authority to grant it, he may do so personally or through a delegate, and conferral, denial or revocation should be in writing.
The norms also say, ``Without prejudice to the rights of the local bishop, a `mandatum,' once granted, remains in effect wherever and as long as the professor teaches unless and until withdrawn by competent ecclesiastical authority.''
In one of the few changes made to the original text in the consultations preceding final Vatican approval, a new footnote was added at that point explaining the standard canonical phrase ``without prejudice to the rights of the local bishop.''
The footnote says, ``Although the general principle is that, once granted, there is no need for the `mandatum' to be granted again by another diocesan bishop, every diocesan bishop has the right to require otherwise in his own diocese.''
The final text of the application includes a few minor editorial revisions, such as substituting ``universal law of the church'' for ``canon law'' in one place and adding ``students'' to a sentence that omitted them in listing the various groups that form the university community.
Most of the changes consisted of inserting additional references to church documents in some of the footnotes.
The Vatican decree of recognition came from the Congregation for Bishops, which oversees the work of bishops' conferences worldwide. It said it found the norms valid and in conformity with church law after consultation with the Congregation for Catholic Education and the Pontifical Council for the Interpretation of Legislative Texts.