I am reviewing our new amicus brief to be filed within weeks challenging ObamaCare at the Supreme Court. I can tell you that this brief represents a clear and compelling argument: the individual mandate, which forces Americans to purchase health insurance under penalty of law, is unconstitutional. It violates the Constitution. I’m delighted to report…

The Supreme Court will hear oral arguments in the ObamaCare case at the end of March. With arguments still two months away, speculation is already growing on what the court will do. There’s an interesting story in The Hill that suggests that backers of ObamaCare “have lost the high level of confidence they once displayed” that the…

Can Congress require you to purchase health insurance? Is it constitutional for Congress to penalize you if you don’t? Those questions are at the core of legal challenges of ObamaCare, which the Supreme Court will consider in March. Our position is clear: the individual mandate is wrong. It is unconstitutional and violates the Commerce Clause…

The appeal of our federal lawsuit targeting ObamaCare took another step forward as we filed our reply brief with the Supreme Court, once again, urging the high court to take our case. As you’ll recall, last month we formally asked the high court to take our case. Now we have filed what’s called a reply brief –…

More from Beliefnet and our partners
More from Beliefnet and our partners
Close Ad