The New Christians

The New Christians

Note from Beliefnet About Commenting

Dear New Christians Readers,

Last week we
implemented a small change to our blog commenting system – you now have to
confirm that you are  a real person, and not a spammer, by typing in a few
characters of text upon submitting your comments. This change was necessary in
order to curtail the amount of spam that many of our blogs have been receiving
in the comments area. We know that some of you have experienced problems with
the new system. We are quickly making changes to address the issues you have
reported–including extending the period before it times out, better messaging
about how to post, and instructions for how to retrieve your post if it appears

hope those changes help. Let us know if there are other changes you recommend.
Thank you for your patience.


Comments read comments(4)
post a comment

posted November 21, 2008 at 5:03 pm

Tony, you have finally crossed the line with this post. Is this extra-step even biblical? [grins]
The nerve.

report abuse

Your Name

posted November 21, 2008 at 8:02 pm

I’ve had problems with posts. Typed in my comments, added the text characters to verify, then it “loses” my comments, and tells me that I must enter the characters to verify. Very frustrating!

report abuse

Existential Punk

posted November 23, 2008 at 5:08 pm

I would LOVE it if you were to add numbers next to each poster. THEN when we are referring to a particular poster’s comment, we reference the number since people make numerous comments within one post. It really helps the conversation better.
Much thanks and appreciation,
Adele Sakler

report abuse

Your Name

posted November 23, 2008 at 8:26 pm

Sex. Hmmm. now, there are cultures where naked men sleep together in lodges and huts. They do not have sex. by and large, either they are not so inclined, or, such behaviour is nonconducive to desired form of bonding. In such cases, sexual desire among men would be…distracting. Minor digression. So, what is Sex, Sexual Desire? Seems “we” are inbuilt with a “need” to perform some procreative activity, to reproduce our kind. But, what does it mean when an ostensibly “male” human being (pick your metric) has that sexual “requirement” directed toward/at the members of “his” own “gender”? Or rather, intimacy and bonding are the highest of ideals, say, but what’s up with a male harboring a sexual desire for another male? Some hew toward their materialist ad hoc explanation. You, as a “Christian”, have no such dodge. specifically from you I ask, what is “sex”? __what is “sexual desire”?__And, insofar as some males have a divergent bonding requirement re other men, how and why does that automatically come down to the desire to have sex with other men, as opposed to merely bonding?__What is the difference, and what is the origin of the confusion?__Is it not entirely possible that what you are actually sanctioning and suborning is some type of gender confusion, in utero, primary, childhood, or otherwise?__Do you imagine that you know enough either way?

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

My Blog Has Moved
Dear Readers, After a year with Beliefnet, I've decided to move to my own domain for my blogging.  It's been a fine year -- some things worked, other things didn't.  But in the end, I'll be a better blogger on my own.  My thanks to the ...

posted 12:13:57pm Nov. 13, 2009 | read full post »

The Most Important Cartoon of the Year
By Steve Breen, San Diego Tribune, October 18, 2009 ...

posted 8:51:22am Oct. 25, 2009 | read full post »

Social Media for Pastors
Following up on Christianity21, we at JoPa Productions are developing a series of boot camps for pastors who want to learn about and utilize social media tools like blogging, Twitter, and Facebook.  These are one-day, hands-on learning ...

posted 10:45:52am Oct. 22, 2009 | read full post »

Ending Christian Euphemisms: "Fundamentalist"
I've taken some heat in the comment section for using yesterday's post on "unbiblical" and a "higher view of scripture" as a thin foil for my own disregard of biblical standards. To the contrary, I was pointing to the use of the word unbiblical ...

posted 10:15:41am Oct. 21, 2009 | read full post »

Why You Should Get GENERATE
Last week at Christianity21, GENERATE Magazine debuted. With the tag line, "an artifact of the emergence conversation," it fit perfectly at the gathering. When I actually got around to reading it last weekend, I was truly surprised at how good ...

posted 3:14:37pm Oct. 20, 2009 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.