Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk

Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk


Kushner and Wallis

posted by Mark Silk

With Ed Koch and the Daily News joining in the chorus of opprobrium, the executive committee of the City University of New York Board of Trustees had no choice but to move with undignified speed to reverse its ill-considered decision to refuse to let the John Jay College of Criminal Justice award an honorary degree to Tony Kushner. What were they thinking?

After the vote to approve the degree, Dr. Goldstein, CUNY’s chancellor, said “the basic misstep was there wasn’t a counterpunch” to Mr. Wiesenfeld’s remarks.

“I’m not sure why the appropriate people didn’t chime in at that time,” he said. Dr. Goldstein, who was present at that meeting, said the presidents of the various colleges are generally expected to address specific questions.

Appropriate person number one would have been Trustee chairman Benno Schmidt, Jr., sometime dean of the Columbia University Law School and president of Yale University. Schmidt had issued a statement Friday in which he called for a reconsideration of the decision, which he termed, somewhat obscurely, “a mistake of principle, and not merely of policy.” The principle, apparently, was that honorary degree recipients shouldn’t have to pass a political litmus test. The policy I’m not so sure about–that a trustee like Jeffrey Wiesenfeld shouldn’t be allowed to give the rest of the board the bum’s rush without counterpunching?

Principle and policy aside, you wonder how, in a town where the theater is a signature industry, no one on the board said, “Hey, the guy won the Pulitzer for Angels in America, he’s the most famous living playwright in America, this isn’t going to look so good.” But no one ever went broke underestimating the ability of higher ed trustees to anticipate consequences.

Speaking of which, Jim Wallis’ attempt at ‘splaining his decision to reject that Believe Out Loud ad seems to be going over like a lead balloon. There’s no shortage of folks who have chafed for years at Wallis’ ability to elbow himself to the front of the progressive religious line. Of course, he is entitled to take whatever position he likes on homosexuality. But to dismiss it as getting in the way of the Big Issues serves only to enrage his natural allies. Schadenfreude aside, the episode does not bode well for Sojourners.



Advertisement
Comments Post the First Comment »
post a comment

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Religion and Public Life. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Latest News Story on Beliefnet Happy Reading!  

posted 3:10:11pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

The Ayn Rand Republicans
I confess to feeling a little bit queasy about the American Values Network's new video hoisting Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Rand Paul, Rush Limbaugh, and other GOP luminaries on the petard of Ayn Rand and her atheistic philosophy of objectivism. Take a look. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TxCW

posted 7:13:30pm May. 24, 2011 | read full post »

Whither evangelicals?
I'm fully prepared to believe that Mitch Daniels' family proved to be the unleapable hurdle in his abortive run-up to the GOP presidential race. Imagine yourself as wife Cheri, having split for the coast to marry on old flame, your husband and young daughters left behind in Boone County, Indiana,

posted 9:19:56am May. 23, 2011 | read full post »

No more "social conservatives"
With the presidential election cycle getting up to speed, it's time for reporters and yakkers like me to stop writing about "social conservatives" as if they were an identifiable segment of the voting population. I say this as someone who has happily been using the term since late 2008, when it

posted 8:25:11am May. 20, 2011 | read full post »

So clerical celibacy was not the problem?
Those on the Catholic left are not very happy that the Jay Report declines in no uncertain terms to blame clerical celibacy for the sexual abuse crisis. As the report puts it: Factors that remained consistent over this time period, such as celibacy, do not explain the sexual abuse "crisis." Celib

posted 9:50:34am May. 19, 2011 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.