Pontifications

Pontifications


Galileo gets his due…

posted by David Gibson

Galileo.jpgPope John Paul II had already “rehabilitated” the astonomer, condemned by the Inquisition in 1633. But as we approach his 450th birthday on Feb. 15, the Vatican is pulling out the stops for Galileo Galilei, the Italian scientist who proved that the earth goes ’round the sun–not the other way around.
From CNS:
Galileo deserves honor, gratitude of Catholic Church, says Vatican
By Carol Glatz
Catholic News Service

VATICAN CITY (CNS) — Galileo Galilei, who had been condemned by the Catholic Church’s Holy Office, was a genius and a man of faith who deserves the appreciation and gratitude of the church, the Vatican said.
The 17th-century astronomer was “a believer who tried, in the context of his time, to reconcile the results of his scientific research with the tenets of the Christian faith,” said a written statement released by the Vatican Jan. 29.
“For this, Galileo deserves all our appreciation and our gratitude,” it said.
Galileo was the first scientist to study the cosmos with a telescope, which opened up a whole new frontier for discovery and forced humanity “to reread the book of nature in a whole new light,” it said.
“Therefore, the church wishes to honor the figure of Galileo — innovative genius and son of the church,” it said.
The statement was released during a Vatican press conference detailing a number of initiatives sponsored by Vatican offices during this year’s International Year of Astronomy.


Not a moment too soon, indeed. But before you jump on the anti-Vatican bandwagon, it’s important to recall that scientific inquiry was, until a couple centuries ago, largely due to church institutions and researchers, and that today the Catholic Church is a bulwark against “scientism” on one side and fundamentalist “literalism” on the other.
In Catholicism, faith and reason, science and meaning, can coexist, as they do, and must, in human beings–not always easily, but at least honestly. And the church does “change” as facts and faith warrant.
Or, at Galileo might have put it, “Eppur, si muove…”



Advertisement
Comments read comments(8)
post a comment
JAB

posted January 31, 2009 at 8:39 am


Isn’t it interesting how long it takes the church to come around?



report abuse
 

etsryan

posted January 31, 2009 at 1:08 pm


what other organization is there with over a billion members of all ages all over the world in most every country to compare the catholic church to? Can you think of one? does a walrus move at the speed of light? (maybe in the baptismal waters…) some wheels turn slowly, but grinding flour is tough work not to be rushed and so is aging wine.
Look how long most folks thought the earth was flat.
many others – not just the church/magesterium condemned many forward thinking prophets/scientists in their time.
Risen Lord Jesus’ Peace!
e.t./sue >> *:D (: +



report abuse
 

Tom

posted January 31, 2009 at 5:57 pm


Most don’t seem to know what originated the source of friction between Galileo and the Ecclesiastical authorities to begin with. This audio link explains it better than I ever could.
http://www.ewtn.com/vondemand/audio/resolve.asp?audiofile=cathbuildciv_04.mp3



report abuse
 

Timothy

posted January 31, 2009 at 7:36 pm


>JAB: “Isn’t it interesting how long it takes the church to come around?”
Yep, it a great thing, as there was no scientific means to prove Galileo’s theories right or wrong until after the American Civil War, when science “caught up.” The Church showed great integrity by not making any premature announcement. Good thing to as we also know, while part of Galileo’s theories are true, science has also disproven some parts as well. The Church would have been in error to wholeheartedly approve Galileo’s work.
http://www.catholic.com/library/galileo_controversy.asp
http://www.catholic.com/thisrock/2003/0305sbs.asp
Its a very good thing that the Church does not make snap decisions in favor of what seems to be true, but abides it time to decide what actually is true. Would that other Christian sects had that integrity and patience.
God bless… +Timothy



report abuse
 

Gerard Nadal

posted February 1, 2009 at 12:11 pm


Tom,
I really enjoy reading your posts.
Great audio by Thomas E. Woods. I also enjoyed his book, How The Catholic Church Built Western Civilization. Far from a papal hagiography, he gives credit where credit is due, and pulls no punches.
Galileo’s has always made for great Protestant agitprop against Rome, always neglecting that Rome built the very civilization out of which Protestantism grew, and as Woods says, not always perfectly or prudently.
Now that Rome, under Pope John Paul The Great’s leadership has rectified our injustices toward Galileo and our Jewish Brethren, as well as having apologized to our Protestant and Orthodox brethren, I wonder if this is where ecumenical dialogue will end? Will ecumenical dialogue continue to consist of Rome apologizing unilaterally? Or will the rest of the world follow his lead and admit their humanity as well? That really is the subtext to the whole Galileo story.



report abuse
 

Tom

posted February 1, 2009 at 2:41 pm


Gerard,
Thanks for the compliment. Enjoy reading your posts as well.
Part of the problem as I see it is that Protestants (and perhaps several factions of the Jewish community though unrelated to ecumenism) tend to question whether the motives of the Catholic Church are genuine. For one, they see the Church’s claim to have the one full deposit of Christian faith to be an arrogant one. Protestantism is in a sense largely based on relativism (Sola Scriptura) at least in retrospect. So many different groups (30 some odd thousand and counting) have splintered as a result of this philosophy because they feared Church hierarchy gaining a monopoly more than Dogmatic errancy.
Protestant communities also felt slighted when they found out they were not “churches”, failing to understand the ancient definition of the term. The Congregation of the Doctrine of Faith explained:
“According to Catholic doctrine, these Communities do not enjoy apostolic succession in the sacrament of Orders, and are, therefore, deprived of a constitutive element of the Church. These ecclesial Communities which, specifically because of the absence of the sacramental priesthood, have not preserved the genuine and integral substance of the Eucharistic Mystery[19] cannot, according to Catholic doctrine, be called “Churches” in the proper sense[20].”
If you ask me, the secular press (not necessarily you, David :-) have done more to slow the wheels of progress to a grinding halt than the Catholic Church ever could. They isolate certain phrases in the Pope’s speeches out of context, feed them to the ill-informed masses, then pandemonium ensues.
Also, if more of us Catholics were ready to ‘render an account’ then more people outside the Church might come to a deeper understanding of what it means to be Catholic. I still have faith that we’ll be able to turn the corner though.
God bless.



report abuse
 

Charles Cosimano

posted February 1, 2009 at 6:00 pm


To quote Jacob Bronowski, “In the year that Galileo died, Isaac Newton was born, and by the time he was through it no longer mattered what any Pope thought about anything.”



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Pontifications. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!  

posted 2:38:01pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Moving on, and many, many thanks...
So...my recent vacation and related absences also coincided with an offer from PoliticsDaily.com to cover religion for them, as editor Melinda Henneberger announces here in her roundup on the site's very successful first 100 days. That means, in short, that I'll have to sign off from blogging h

posted 8:29:24pm Aug. 02, 2009 | read full post »

Calvin at 500, Calvinism 2.0
If you thought you knew John Calvin--who turned 500 last week--you probably don't know enough. For example, that he was French, born Jean Cauvin. And if he was in fact scandalized by dancing, he was also a lot more complex than that. I explored the new look Calvin in an essay at PoliticsDaily, "Patr

posted 11:53:35am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

Apologia pro vita sua...Kinda
 In my defense, I've had computer outages and family reunions and a few days of single-parenthood, which is always a bracing reminder of what many parents go through all the time. And this weekend it's off for a week's vacation. Anyway, hence the long absence. Apologies to those who have chec

posted 10:51:36am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

When Benny met Barry: "I'll pray for you!"
The first word via Vatican Radio and first image (that I saw) via Rocco: Speaking to Vatican Radio, Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi said "moral values in international politics, immigration and the Catholic Church's contribution in developing countries" were key topics of discussio

posted 12:54:28pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.