Mark D. Roberts

Mark D. Roberts


Science vs. Religion: What Scientists Really Think

posted by Mark D. Roberts

You hear a lot these days about science and religion. Most anti-religious folk claim that science undermines or even contradicts religious faith. As evidence for this claim (which, by the way, is not scientific, but philosophical), they point to the “fact” that very few scientists are religious.

Now we can get the facts about science and religion, at least the facts about what scientists actually believe. Elaine Howard Ecklund, a sociologist at Rice University, has recently published a book with the intriguing title: Science Vs. Religion What Scientists Really Think. It was published last year by Oxford University Press. Science vs. Religion is the result of extensive research conducted by Ecklund over many years. I read this book, finding it full of information and insights, as well as delightfully readable. I learned a lot from this book, mostly, that the whole issue of “Science vs. Religion” is much more nuanced than many assume. Scientists are much more open to religion that we might expect. Moreover, those scientists who reject religion rarely do so as a direct result of their scientific studies. (Photo: Ecklund and Michael Cromartie, host of the Faith Angle Forum.)

ecklund-elaine-howard-5.jpg

I highly recommend Ecklund’s book. But if you don’t have time for a two-hundred plus page book, there is another option for you. Ecklund delivered a lecture in November, in which she summarized her major findings and answered questions as well. This happened in the context of the Faith Angle Forum, a semi-annual event sponsored by the Ethics and Public Policy Center. This gathering brings together some of the top religion journalists from the country, including most major news sources (NY Times, CBS, ABC, NBC, Fox News, NPR, etc.). They hear presentations from leading thinkers whose work bears upon religious issues. 

I was pleased to be present for this event as an observer. I heard Ecklund’s lecture after having read her book. Not surprisingly, she provides an excellent summary of her material. (Ecklund, an outstanding academic scholar, also has the ability to community with ordinary folk.) Now a transcript of this lecture is available online at the Ethics and Public Policy Center website.  You may also want to read the response to this lecture by Barbara Bradley Haggerty of NPR. It’s included after Ecklund’s lecture.

I am encouraged by the Faith Angle Forum and by the work of Ecklund. The FAF offers a place for influential journalists to consider religious issues openly and seriously. It helps to raised the quality of religion reporting in major media outlets. Ecklund’s work is bringing clarity to a cloudy issue. She is able to deal with the science vs. religion debate in a calm, irenic, and knowledgeable way. Kudos to Michael Cromartie and Elaine Howard Ecklund for this excellent contribution to civil discourse and a respectful search for truth.  

 



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
S Richardson

posted January 21, 2011 at 2:57 pm


Yikes! It took me all day to read the transcript. What is a person without a PhD behind their name to do?



report abuse
 

Thomas E. Buck

posted January 24, 2011 at 7:34 pm


It took me several days to read this. Very interesting. I enjoyed reading about the study on free will and studies about how the brain can change.
I had to laugh at the note at the end of the transcript about it being edited. As it was, much of the discourse was rambling and vague, making it difficult for this layman hard to read.
It was a good thing I decided to read it to the end. Some of my early assumptions about one of the participants were proven inaccurate by later discourse.
In the future I will try to pay more attention to the prejudicial attitude I may bring to a conversation about scientists, or academia in general. I don’t want to be pushing people away from the church because of poor assumptions.



report abuse
 

Thomas E. Buck

posted January 24, 2011 at 7:36 pm


Sorry, should have read “…making it difficult for this layman to read.”



report abuse
 

John

posted June 28, 2011 at 10:17 pm


I visited the http://www.Trivedifoundation.org site and this spiritual teacher is taking on the science community. He’s says that he can cure diseased cells and transform them into healthy ones. The scientists that take on his project are of the top in the world and they don’t know how he does it but can only go stand by the fact that after his energy transmissions, the cells have been transformed. In total there has been over 3,000 scientific experiments on his energy transmissions with amazing results.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Mark D. Roberts. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 2:09:11pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? Conclusions
In this series on the death of Jesus, I have presented four different perspectives on why Jesus had to die: Roman, Jewish, Jesus’, and Early Christian. I believe that each of these points of view has merit, and that we cannot fully understand the necessity of Jesus’ death without taking them all

posted 2:47:39am Apr. 11, 2011 | read full post »

Sunday Inspiration from the High Calling
Can We Find God in the City? Psalm 48:1-14 Go, inspect the city of Jerusalem. Walk around and count the many towers. Take note of the fortified walls, and tour all the citadels, that you may describe them to future generations. For that is what God is like. He is our God forever and ever,

posted 2:05:51am Apr. 10, 2011 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Perspective of the First Christians, Part 3
An Act and Symbol of Love Perhaps one of the most startling of the early Christian interpretations of the cross was that it was all about love. It’s easy in our day, when crosses are religious symbols, attractive ornaments, and trendy jewelry to associate the cross with love. But, in the first

posted 2:41:47am Apr. 08, 2011 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Perspective of the First Christians, Part 2
The Means of Reconciliation In my last post, I examined one of the very earliest Christian statements of the purpose of Jesus’ death. According to the tradition encapsulated in 1 Corinthians 15, Jesus died “for our sins in accordance with the scriptures” (15:3). Yet this text doesn’t expl

posted 2:30:03am Apr. 07, 2011 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.