Mark D. Roberts

Mark D. Roberts


Church and the Internet: We’re Not in Kansas Anymore (Section 3)

posted by Mark D. Roberts

In the last couple of days I’ve been reflecting on the impact of the Internet on the church, especially with respect to the calling of a new pastor in a church. I want to finish up (for now) with some general reflections.
1. We can’t go back to Kansas. 
If Kansas represents a world of secure, local communications, a world where the confidentiality of things like pastor-calling efforts can be protected, then we can’t go back to Kansas. There are no Ruby slippers for the church. What the Internet, cell phones, and related technologies have started cannot be stopped. Oh, I expect some churches will manage to hold back the tide for a while. And, just you watch, soon we’ll be seeing younger generations rejecting electronic church and going unplugged. This kind of reaction is almost guaranteed. But, for the most part, we will not be able to unflatten the world. (By the way, the metaphor of the Internet-related flatness of the world comes from Thomas L. Friedman’s watershed book, The World is Flat. Photo: My daughter and her friend dressing up as ruby slippers for Halloween.)
2. Just because the technology is available, that does not mean we should use it.
Though I think the Internet and related technologies are here to stay, and though I think the church needs to use them in a thoughtful and faithful way, I do not assume that just because a technology is available that it should, therefore, be used. My family and I, for example, still live in the dinosaur age of TV antennas. We do have a television at home, but we do not have cable, or sattelite, or whatever else is available. The only TV we get comes in for free from the small antenna attached to our chimney. We have made this unusual choice, not only to save money, but also because we just don’t need more TV in our home.
3. Christians and churches need to learn to think strategically, creatively, and, most of all, theologically about technology. 
In my experience, we’re pretty good at the first, thinking strategically about technology. We can evaluate its impact on our lives and ministries, though sometimes we do not consider unintended consequences of technology.
I have not sensed an abundance of creativity among Christians and churches when it comes to technology. Mostly we do what the world does. Or we copy the megachurches. Or at least we try (usually, without much success). I include myself in this observation, by the way.
But I am most concerned about the lack of theological reflection on technology among Christians of all stripes (conservative, liberal, pro-tech, anti-tech, etc. etc.).
4. Technology is part of this world, which means it necessarily includes both good and evil, as well as relatively neutral “stuff.”
There’s a bit of theological reflection.  If we take seriously the fundamental goodness of creation and its fallenness, then we should expect all technologies to be a mix of good and evil, right and wrong. Moreover, they will be used by us fallen people, who, even if we have been redeemed, are not yet fully renewed. In my opinion, the example of Rich Kannwischer and St. Andrew’s exemplifies the moral mixed-up-ness of technology.
5. Those of us who have the resources to entertain ourselves with technological wonders, even in church, need to think long and hard about how our choices impact (or do not impact) Christians and churches who don’t have such resources.
I sometimes wonder if our lavish technological expenditures make sense in a world where so many Christians and churches have so little.
6. I have no idea how much technology there will be in the new creation, but a part of me hopes it’s rather more like a garden than a Wi-Fi hotspot. 
I won’t be all that sad if there are cell phones and even the Web in the new heaven and new earth. But I do hope there’s something like an iPod for listening to music. Angelic choirs are fine, but I would prefer a little variety.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
Nathan W. Bingham

posted July 31, 2009 at 4:52 am


This is a very helpful summary. I appreciate you noting that technology has aspects of both good and evil. Too often we are quick to place something like technology into either one basket or the other, without having any serious reflection and consideration.
Up until recently I had been very “anti” social-networking. Thought the whole thing was silly and a waste of time, etc. However, through my blog I was convinced to join Twitter to keep in contact with my readership and over the past months, despite some negative things, I have received some real benefits. After asking other Twitter users, and compiling my own thoughts, I wrote 8 Ways Twitter Can Benefit The Christian earlier this week. My thoughts may provide insightful as a more ‘personal’ (not corporate) Christian perspective on Twitter specifically.



report abuse
 

Stefan Gelfgren

posted July 31, 2009 at 6:47 am


Thanks for your reflections around Church and Internet. Interesting to read. However, this issue (church and information technology) isn’t new. The Church and its representatives have used various forms of technologies to spread the gospel. Think for example about Luther and the printing technique, or 19th century revivalism and the process of industrialisation. But, as history show, technology can/will transform religious faith and practices in different ways. Therefore I appreciate your reflections.



report abuse
 

Thomas Buck

posted July 31, 2009 at 6:50 am


Mark:
Re: #2. A. I guess we czn’t “fire” people in church, but if we violate a trust at my job, we get the opportunity to look for new work.
#2. B. Did you already have the TV necessary for digital broadcasts, or did you have to buy something to get them?
Re: #6. Yeah, I’m with you there! I think God’s already planned something even better for us in heaven.



report abuse
 

Bill Goff

posted August 2, 2009 at 8:22 am


Does your little antenna on your roof receive digital TV? I’ve been out of the USA since June 13th, but I thought analog TV had ceased to exist. If you can get digital TV from your roof antenna, you might consider marketing it.



report abuse
 

Mark D. Roberts

posted August 2, 2009 at 2:01 pm


Bill: The antenna does receive digital TV. It’s nothing special at all. But we did have to get a couple of analog/digital units so our antiquated televisions could read the signal. These small boxes of electronics were fairly inexpensive.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Mark D. Roberts. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 2:09:11pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? Conclusions
In this series on the death of Jesus, I have presented four different perspectives on why Jesus had to die: Roman, Jewish, Jesus’, and Early Christian. I believe that each of these points of view has merit, and that we cannot fully understand the necessity of Jesus’ death without taking them all

posted 2:47:39am Apr. 11, 2011 | read full post »

Sunday Inspiration from the High Calling
Can We Find God in the City? Psalm 48:1-14 Go, inspect the city of Jerusalem. Walk around and count the many towers. Take note of the fortified walls, and tour all the citadels, that you may describe them to future generations. For that is what God is like. He is our God forever and ever,

posted 2:05:51am Apr. 10, 2011 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Perspective of the First Christians, Part 3
An Act and Symbol of Love Perhaps one of the most startling of the early Christian interpretations of the cross was that it was all about love. It’s easy in our day, when crosses are religious symbols, attractive ornaments, and trendy jewelry to associate the cross with love. But, in the first

posted 2:41:47am Apr. 08, 2011 | read full post »

Why Did Jesus Have to Die? The Perspective of the First Christians, Part 2
The Means of Reconciliation In my last post, I examined one of the very earliest Christian statements of the purpose of Jesus’ death. According to the tradition encapsulated in 1 Corinthians 15, Jesus died “for our sins in accordance with the scriptures” (15:3). Yet this text doesn’t expl

posted 2:30:03am Apr. 07, 2011 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.