Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


The Oracle of LaVonne-i

posted by Scot McKnight

LaVonne Neff, over at Lively Dust, has said it so well so I’ll just quote her. She estimates that it would cost each pro-abortion advocate 6 dollars a year to fund the abortion industry. So go ahead she says:



 Personally, I’m glad the House voted in favor of health care and against public funding of abortion–I’m one of those politically liberal, pro-life Catholics. But pro-choicers, if you really want to make abortion easily available and totally free, stop whining and just do it. Really, you won’t miss the ten cents. And by going private, you can keep your ideology from sinking the entire national health-care plan.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Paul Hedberg

posted November 10, 2009 at 8:34 am


I like the concept. Too bad we really don’t have mechanisms to make something like this work.



report abuse
 

ChrisB

posted November 10, 2009 at 10:45 am


“I’m glad the House voted in favor of health care and against public funding of abortion”
One of the problems with out system is that unless the House and Senate pass exactly the same bill, the two have to be reconciled in a “conference committee.” What goes in the conference — invariably by the party elite, behind closed doors — can easily undo whatever minor victory the so-called pro-life Dems achieved.
If there is a conference, the resulting bill will have both a public option and public financing of abortion.
This is the problem with pro-life Democrats. They can vote for all the pro-life legislation they want. Unfortunately they still keep Pelosi et al in power, and she gets to choose which bills she will allow them to vote on.
@Paul,
It’s called the US postal service. Seriously. I send money to crisis pregnancy centers through the mail. The pro-choicers can send it to Murder Inc. Lots of them do, but a great many are more concerned with getting me to fund abortion than spending any of their own money on it.



report abuse
 

David Opderbeck

posted November 10, 2009 at 12:30 pm


I’m strongly pro-life, so I’m glad this issue has been flagged in the health care debate. I’m also glad the Catholic Bishops have been a driving force here, because they otherwise support health care reform, so this obviously is not merely a right-wing attempt to derail the whole project.
Having said that, Neff’s argument is cute, but it really isn’t fair to the views of the pro-choice side. Their point is that abortion is a form of healthcare; excluding abortion funding from a comprehensive healthcare plan, they argue, deprives women of full access to care. The real debate should be sober and deep — is a human fetus a being with moral status or not — and the other side’s arguments should be taken seriously. I think a human fetus does have moral status, but I’m not going to claim that is self-evident at every stage of fetal development.



report abuse
 

MatthewS

posted November 10, 2009 at 9:18 pm


I wish there could be an acceptable but powerful iconic image of abortion like the “Execution of a Viet Cong Guerrilla” image from 1968.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.