Flunking Sainthood

Flunking Sainthood

The Gospel Doctrine Teacher: Ben Spackman’s Weekly Podcast

It’s Mormon Monday again at Flunking Sainthood, and since I am on vacation — well, sort of; I am finishing a book — I’m pleased to point readers toward something of good report in Mormondom. Ben Spackman, a very astute student of the Bible and the ancient world, has started a cool weekly podcast specifically for Gospel Doctrine teachers, though I think that anyone who is interested in learning more about the Bible would benefit from his expertise. In this interview, he discusses the podcast, some of the challenges inherent in the Gospel Doctrine manual, and other great resources available for teachers.



When and why did you start the Gospel Doctrine podcast on

We started about 3 months ago, after kicking around ideas for a while. Most people need something in order to make sense of the chapters they’re reading in the scriptures, especially for the King James Version translation of the Old Testament. The Old Testament authors wrote for their contemporaries within their own culture, and thus rarely bother to explain anything, since they expected an audience already familiar with it! That means there is a lot going on that needs to be unpacked and made explicit, whether historical, cultural, geographical, let alone things that are lost in translation. Plus, I love teaching, and this is an extension of the classroom, in a way.


Why did you decide to offer these resources as a podcast rather than a blog?

We decided on a podcast because no one else was doing one, and because it can be accessed away from the computer, while traveling or cooking, for example. A podcast can also reach people who don’t usually read blogs. We’re looking at offering subscriptions via iTunes or distribution through some other means.

I know you worked on a Ph.D. in Near Eastern Languages and Civilizations at the University of Chicago, which has one of the finest biblical studies programs in the world. How do you draw upon those credentials while still “keeping it real” for the ordinary Gospel Doctrine teacher in the trenches?


It’s not easy. Some say studying the scriptures from an academic perspective is like leaving The Garden of Eden — you can never go back, never unlearn what you’ve learned. My experience as a volunteer Institute teacher, almost nine years now, has refined my approach a lot, by helping me understand what’s useful to the average person and also what puts them to sleep. It’s also given me lots of experience “translating” into terminology or conceptual frameworks that LDS instinctively grasp.

I find two tools to be the most useful: language skills (which can be obviated by using a few different Bible translations) and historical/culture knowledge to bridge the gap created either by the original writers (who wrote primarily for their contemporaries) or by nature of having to cover so much material so fast. Sometimes when jumping from lesson to lesson, we get a completely new set of characters or circumstances, without any idea of how they are related to the previous lesson or how they came about.


What do you find most challenging or difficult about teaching from the Gospel Doctrine manual? If you were on the curriculum committee, what would you change?

I think the biggest challenge (and there are several) about teaching from the manual is just that — that we HAVE a manual, and some kind of moral imperative to teach from it, instead of capable teachers working purely from the scriptures. I recognize the idealism represented by that view. Perhaps I’ll have to explain and expand on it in a post. I assume the manual isn’t going away anytime soon, so I would change it with three simple additions:

First, many LDS don’t know where to find good scriptural resources or have any way of evaluating the worth or reliability of a given source, so I’d provide a general bibliography of non-LDS resources at the beginning of the manual and perhaps a short one with each chapter.



Second, as a necessary accompaniment, I would add a statement that such a list doesn’t indicate Church approval or endorsement, that they represents a variety of viewpoints, but can be useful supplements worth reading. For example, the NIV Application Commentary comes from a conservative Evangelical perspective and has a devotional/personal application orientation but still provides lots of good historical/cultural background. The problem with this approach is that it wouldn’t translate, as most of these resources remain unavailable in Spanish, let alone Mandarin or Malagasy. To counter that lack, Institute manuals, which are available in other languages, would have to be expanded and rewritten to perform the same job on a smaller scale. There are few cases in the scriptures where the Church has an official or revealed position. (See the instructions to BYU Religious Education instructors.) For the rest, I’d want a more open approach, one that explicitly provides alternative views and differing interpretations.


Third, I’d include a statement echoing Elder Carmack (and others) that the KJV is our official, public English Bible, but certainly other translations are useful to study and read and there’s nothing wrong with that, and here are a few suggested versions. I think those three things could do wonders for the active participant in Gospel Doctrine class.

What kinds of feedback have you gotten from listeners and from the Church?

Very little, but all positive. In my own ward, I asked if it could get into the weekly ward email with announcements and such. One member of the Bishopric objected generally on the grounds that it wasn’t correlated church material (true enough), but after listening to one, he said, “get it in!”


What other sites and resources do you recommend to help Gospel Doctrine teachers?

Several sites have good relevant posts from time to time– FaithPromotingRumor (run mostly by LDS grad students in Bible and related fields), ByCommonConsent, TimesandSeasons (Julie Smith and Jim F.), Feast Upon the Word (though a bit too philosophical at times), BoredInVernal at MormonMatters. FAIR does some good posts on potential questions or difficulties that may come up in a given lesson as well. I’m putting together a list of my favorite or most useful posts from here and there about teaching in general.

  • Chris

    I totally get this. I sometimes wonder if adding these extra thoughts, background, etc. may risk distracting from a general principle of the lesson.
    I understand how some people get annoyed that our classes aren’t so focused on what happens within every single chapter and book in the OT, NT, BoM, etc. but rather looks for principles to structure the lesson and jumps around to verses/sections which highlight those principles. So naturally, when you prepare a lesson and you read through 5 chapters, you’re getting a lot more than the principle that’s being taught in the lesson, and many times, there is a lot else there in those chapters and a dozen unanswered questions in those chapters.
    I’ve wondered about this and what could/should be done. My personal conclusions are the church is not there to teach me the scriptures, and I shouldn’t expect it to be a Bible study group (maybe we need one, maybe that should be fulfilled by Institute-type classes). In many regards we get a bit of Bible study group out of our Sunday school classes, but only here and there, and in bits and pieces.
    I’ll tread lightly here and say that I don’t like the idea of making an idol out of the scriptures, where we become so consumed with focusing on every minute aspect of the details, history, etc. that we lose the larger points. Naturally, as a Later-day Saint I feel we have a better perspective on the purpose and plan for this life, so the scriptures become a tool to add meaning, relevance and enlightenment to that.
    I’m always interested in history, behind the scenes, commentary, etc. that help to add to the scriptures, but I can also see how it would be easy to focus on that too much and forget the important truths and principles we know — and even sometimes our manuals forget this too!
    Anyway, I’ll conclude by saying, I felt and often remind myself, that when I receive thoughts like this I consider it personal revelation. Often my instinct is to run out and share it or teach it to someone else, and I’m realizing the Lord wants me to do that as appropriate, but often these kind of things are beneficial for me and then I need to take the principles I learn and pass those on where appropriate rather than try to teach the same lesson I received from personal revelation. Hope that made sense… long story short, what works for you, works for you for a reason because God gave it to you, but maybe don’t expect it to need to be applied to everyone else. I’d add in the final caveat that clearly this brother as a teacher is not only receiving revelation for him, but also what would be good for his class/ward and I’m not knocking it down.
    But likewise that doesn’t mean anything about a general policy for others classes, etc.

  • Chris

    Oh and I really like the idea of a discussion board for Sunday school teachers to discuss the lesson, where it is done with the idea of exchanging information, thoughts on the lessons, etc.
    I could also see how it would all too easily turn into a manual-grip fest, but that’s life.

  • BARLOWCasandra20

    If you want to buy real estate, you will have to get the personal loans. Moreover, my mother usually takes a term loan, which occurs to be really fast.

  • Pingback: A Series of Announcements; or, Be Excited, Be Very Excited | Times & Seasons

  • Pingback: Gospel Doctrine Lessons 14, 15: Podcasts!

Previous Posts

Another blog to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Flunking Sainthood. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here is another blog you may also enjoy: Fellowship of Saints and Sinners Happy Reading!!! ...

posted 3:12:01pm Jul. 05, 2012 | read full post »

Thank You, Flunking Sainthood Readers!
OK, I admit it. I have a Google Alert on the title Flunking Sainthood, so that the search engine lets me know when there are new reviews or discussions about the book. In the last few weeks it has been exciting -- and humbling -- to see the many ...

posted 12:41:10pm Jan. 25, 2012 | read full post »

NYC Conference on Mormonism & American Politics, February 3-4
"First Mitt won Iowa, then he lost Iowa? That's a classic Romney flip-flop." --Stephen Colbert     Working with the theory that there hasn't been nearly enough attention to Mormonism and politics this year, what with it being ...

posted 11:09:19am Jan. 23, 2012 | read full post »

Writing Retreat
Friends, I will be offline until January 23 for a writing retreat. I'm bringing my computer, ...

posted 8:47:20pm Jan. 14, 2012 | read full post »

Fun with the Book of Lamentations
Actually, no. That title was just a ...

posted 11:33:13am Jan. 13, 2012 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.