City of Brass

City of Brass

nuclear Iran – II

Daniel Larison argues that the Obama Administration is making a mistake of giving up on engagement with Iran:

First, Washington believes that the “international community” objects to Iran’s nuclear program and is prepared to punish Iran for it. The truth is, Iran is more economically and politically integrated around the world than it has ever been, and many of its trading partners are far more interested in Iranian business and energy than in lecturing Tehran about proliferation. In any case, the West’s anti-proliferation concerns are so obviously selective — encouraging India while shrugging at Pakistan’s flagrant proliferation activities and Israel’s not-very-secret nuclear arsenal– that they are not taken seriously, except by Westerners. Many rising powers in Asia and Latin America, including China and Brazil, not only do not view Iran’s program as a threat, they may even find it useful as a counterweight to U.S. power.


Second, the administration seems to have assumed that it need only make superficial gestures of goodwill in order for Tehran to reciprocate with genuine concessions on one of its most popular and important projects. The choices offered to Tehran have been few and unattractive: either they suspend enrichment or face additional sanctions. There is no reward for cooperation — merely an absence of penalties. Even though Iran is permitted by international treaty to pursue enrichment for civilian purposes, Washington does not trust Iran’s government to resist the temptation of nuclear weapons. So the U.S. refuses to permit Iran to do even those things that international law allows. Iran is left to demonstrate — somehow — that it has no intention of developing weapons, despite its lack of technical capability and the absence of conclusive evidence that it even pursues this goal.


Iran’s situation is analogous to Iraq before the 2003 invasion: the weaker state must prove something to the satisfaction of the vastly stronger party, yet the latter has no interest in believing anything it hears. The Iranian government sees that the game is rigged, so it has no incentive to make concessions.

The point about the international community not really being opposed to Iranian nukes is a good one. It’s only because we have accepted the Israeli argument that Iran is an irrational Amalek rather than a deterrable player that the official US stance is so firmly anti-Iranian nuke. But in accepting the Israeli narrative, we stand alone. I still see no reason to expect that Iran isn’t intending to go nuclear, and will succeed. And there really is very little that we or Israel can do about it – including full invasion, which was taken off the table during the Bush Administration so is even more negligible an option now.


However, it’s still not clear to me just what “incentives” we could have offered. The Obama Administration has been much more engaged than the previous one, and tried to give benefit of the doubt about Iran’s stated desire for nuclear power, not weapons. The deal offered to Iran was so reasonable that even Russia, Iran’s staunchest ally, was upset that they turned it down:

MOSCOW – Russia regrets that Iran has apparently rejected a UN-brokered nuclear fuel exchange deal to ease the standoff over its atomic programme, Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov said on Friday.

“We regret that Iran — as far as we can see — does not consider it possible to agree to the formula that it was offered,” Lavrov told a news conference.


Under the plan, Iran would hand over most of its stocks of low-enriched uranium in return for the supply by France and Russia of nuclear fuel enriched to the higher level required for a Tehran research reactor.

If Iran’s nuclear power program is really non-weapon, then why on earth would this be a concern? How on earth can this deal be represented as a “concession” ?

Yes there are double standards at work. But taken on the merits, the deal offered Iran was hardly unfair. Just as it’s utterly ludicrouus for Israel to pretend they don’t have nuclear weapons, it’s ludicrous for Iran to pretend they are just interested in nuclear energy alone. The rejection of the UN deal is about as clear evidence as you can ask for.


Related: Hillary Clinton’s comments about Iran at the US – Islamic World Summit in Doha:

In his inaugural address, President Obama endorsed a new era of diplomatic engagement, including with those nations who have at times been hostile to the United States. We have proven our willingness to engage. For example, we are resuming high-level contacts with the Syrian government. And we are preparing to send an Ambassador back to Damascus for the first time since 2005.

We have pursued extensive efforts to reengage with Iran, both through direct communication and through greater participation in multilateral efforts. Our goal has been, that after 30 years of hostile relations with Iran, we need to begin to build a more constructive relationship.


Our position regarding Iran’s nuclear program is simple. We believe that all states, including Iran, start with the same rights and the same responsibilities. And according to the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty, nations have the right to nuclear power so long as they accept the responsibility of demonstrating unequivocally that their programs are used solely for peaceful civilian purposes.

But Iran has consistently failed to live up to its responsibility. It has refused to demonstrate to the international community that its nuclear program is entirely peaceful. And last year, the world learned of a secret nuclear facility near the city of Qom. The IAEA Board of Governors responded with a resolution criticizing Iran that received wide support.


In October, in our continuing efforts at engagement, the United States, for the first time, joined the so-called P-5+1 in meeting with Iran in Geneva. These were the highest level discussions between the United States and Iran in more than 30 years. We went to Geneva with the hope that Iran would seize the opportunity to begin to resolve our differences, and to pursue greater political and economic integration with the international community. We joined Russia, France, the United Kingdom, China, and Germany to endorse an offer to provide Iran with fuel for the Tehran Research Reactor, which creates medical isotopes for medical treatment. This offer demonstrated a good-faith commitment to working with Iran toward a future civil nuclear program for peaceful purposes.


Iran agreed in principle, but then refused the IAEA’s terms. Now, Iran has announced that it will increase its enrichment activities to produce up to 20 percent enriched uranium, in violation of successive United Nations Security Council resolutions. And its explanation doesn’t add up. It could have the very enriched uranium it says it seeks by accepting the international IAEA offer. So this has only deepened the international community’s doubts about Iran’s nuclear intentions, along with increasing isolation of Iranian government.

Furthermore, since the meeting in Geneva in October, Iranian officials have refused every offer to meet on its nuclear program. So these actions, understandably, have caused us to wonder: What does Iran have to hide? Why is Iran refusing to live up to its international obligations, which would lead to political and economic integration with the international community that would actually benefit the Iranian people?


Iran leaves the international community little choice but to impose greater costs for its provocative steps. Together, we are encouraging Iran to reconsider its dangerous policy decisions. We are now working actively with our regional and international partners, in the context of our dual track approach, to prepare and implement new measures to convince Iran to change its course.

And of course, our concerns about the Iranian government’s intentions are intensified by its behavior toward its own people. The world has watched the events of the past several months in Iran with alarm. We know of the large-scale detentions and mass trials, political executions, the intimidation of family members of the opposition, and the refusal to extend Iranian citizens the right to peaceful assembly and expression, as we have seen again in just the last few days.

The United States joins other nations in condemning these events. If the Iranian government wants the respect of the international community, it must respect the rights of its people.

Comments read comments(12)
post a comment

posted February 20, 2010 at 1:37 am

“The rejection of the UN deal is about as clear evidence as you can ask for.”
No it is not. It is perfectly reasonable for Iran to object to sending it’s uranium to countries that have a proven track record of failing to live up to agreed upon contracts. The French took in billions of dollars from Iran to develop Iran’s nuclear program but failed to deliver once the shah was overthrown (they still kept the money) and Russia has delayed the construction of the Busher nuclear plant for over ten years.
Iran’s counter offer was for a swap inside its territory where the IAEA would still have all powers to monitor and inspect. It’s a remarkable compromise given that as a member of the NPT treaty it is not obligated to make a swap. In fact, under the treaty, it is assured the right to purchase the fuel outright, which the US is preventing.
Obama could’ve shown he was serious by accepting this compromise but instead is still asking for Iran to put it’s trust in the very pro-israeli government of Sarkozy.

report abuse


posted February 22, 2010 at 6:44 pm

I am willing to say that a professional sociology essay writing service can be a light on the way of analysis essay composing. Hence, all students should use it anytime they would like to buy essay.

report abuse

payday loans toronto

posted July 26, 2010 at 9:20 pm is great! Hence some big magic is epected from the payday loans This signifies that now the short term epenses which appear regularly on monthly basis is getting more attention and payday credit is helping out a lot in tackling those epenses on a good level

report abuse

payday loans in canada

posted September 21, 2010 at 8:17 pm

I’m happy to have found your very good article! I agree with some of your readers and will eagerly look forward to your coming updates. Just saying thanks will not just be adequate, for the wonderful lucidity in your writing. I will instantly grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Good work and much success in your business efforts.

report abuse

no faxing loans

posted September 22, 2010 at 7:17 pm

Awesome concepts on this web page. It’s rare these days to find websites with data you are seeking. I am happy I chanced on this webpage. I will certainly bookmark it or even register for your rss feeds simply to be updated on your new posts. Maintain up the nice job and I’m sure some other folks researching valued information will actually stop by and benefit from your site for resources. lruicuymuea

report abuse

loans online no fax

posted September 25, 2010 at 7:35 pm

Thanks for such a great post and the review, I am totally impressed! Keep stuff like this coming.

report abuse

online payday loans

posted December 18, 2010 at 12:38 am

This website is the most reliable web-site. ierpylwo

report abuse

school grants

posted December 18, 2010 at 7:40 pm

This website is the best world-wide-web site. qstdwcrm

report abuse

sample resume

posted December 22, 2010 at 6:28 am

This website is the recommended net page. vgpoeusf

report abuse

football online

posted December 24, 2010 at 9:42 am

I am looking for watch nfl football online p2p. How can I find it?

report abuse

school grants

posted January 12, 2011 at 9:20 am

Excellent read about nuclear Iran – II
– City of Brass!

report abuse

payday loans calgary

posted February 16, 2011 at 11:22 pm

I like your bloge very much. Great job author of

report abuse

Previous Posts

Deen and Mohabbat: There is no faith without love
This is a guest post by Yusuf Zakir. My religion--Islam--is discussed and portrayed in the media quite a lot these days, much to my chagrin. The American public is, generally, fearful of Muslims. Anti-Islamic sentiment is at an all-time ...

posted 10:10:30pm Oct. 07, 2015 | read full post »

nationwide hate rallies planned at mosques Oct 9-10, Homeland Security conf call
This weekend, there is a planned, armed protest "in every country, at every mosque" by a group called the "Global Rally for Humanity". So far, the protests are falling short of global, but they do have 21 mosques, community centers and ...

posted 1:40:08pm Oct. 06, 2015 | read full post »

why don't they condemn?
Ever since 9-11, and well before it, this is the litany of accusation that ordinary Muslim Americans have had to endure: Muslims do not condemn - there is no million Muslim march against terrorism. Islam is an inherently violent ...

posted 1:47:45pm Oct. 02, 2015 | read full post »

a Republican, Muslim Mayor of St Louis?
Umar Lee is many things - a native ...

posted 1:09:57am Sep. 30, 2015 | read full post »

Abrahamic Convergence - inspiration, forgiveness, and tragedy
This week is a truly portentous one for Muslims, Jews, and Catholics. In one week, we have Yom Kippur, the Day of Arafat and Eid ul Adha, and Pope Francis' first visit to the United States. I like the term "Abrahamic Convergence" for this sort ...

posted 3:08:38pm Sep. 24, 2015 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.