City of Brass

City of Brass

Sarah Palin is lying about death panels

Palin still insists that death panels are a reality:

Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin refused to retreat from her debunked claim that a proposed health care overhaul would create “death panels,” as the growing furor over end-of-life consultations forced a key group of senators to abandon the idea in their bill.

Sen. Chuck Grassley, R-Iowa, one of six lawmakers negotiating on a Senate bill, said Thursday they had dropped end-of-life provisions from consideration “entirely because of the way they could be misinterpreted and implemented incorrectly.”

In a Facebook posting titled “Concerning Death Panels,” Palin argued Wednesday night that the elderly and ailing would be coerced into accepting minimal end-of-life care to reduce health care costs based on the Democratic bill in the House.

But there will be no “death panels” under the legislation being considered. In fact, the provision in the bill would allow Medicare to pay doctors for voluntary counseling sessions that address end-of-life issues. The conversations between doctor and patient would include living wills, making a close relative or a trusted friend your health care proxy, learning about hospice as an option for the terminally ill, and information about pain medications for people suffering chronic discomfort.

The sessions would be covered every five years, more frequently if someone is gravely ill.

The American Medical Association and the National Hospice and Palliative Care Organization support the provision.

In her posting, Palin wrote: “With all due respect, it’s misleading for the president to describe this section as an entirely voluntary provision that simply increases the information offered to Medicare recipients,” and added, “It’s all just more evidence that the Democratic legislative proposals will lead to health care rationing.”

This is a deliberate strategy by Palin, to force the result described above – to pressure the Senate into dropping the provision entirely. As the wire article notes, nowhere in the bill is there any coercive element to the end-of-life counseling, something that is absolutely clear from a reading of the relevant section of the bill. Here is what the bill (the draft version passed by the House) says (Section 1233 of H.R.3200):


Advance Care Planning Consultation

`(hhh)(1) … the term `advance care planning consultation’ means a consultation between the individual and a practitioner described in paragraph (2) regarding advance care planning, if, subject to paragraph (3), the individual involved has not had such a consultation within the last 5 years. Such consultation shall include the following:
`(A) An explanation by the practitioner of advance care planning, including key questions and considerations, important steps, and suggested people to talk to.
`(B) An explanation by the practitioner of advance directives, including living wills and durable powers of attorney, and their uses.
`(C) An explanation by the practitioner of the role and responsibilities of a health care proxy.
`(D) The provision by the practitioner of a list of national and State-specific resources to assist consumers and their families with advance care planning, including the national toll-free hotline, the advance care planning clearinghouses, and State legal service organizations (including those funded through the Older Americans Act of 1965).
`(E) An explanation by the practitioner of the continuum of end-of-life services and supports available, including palliative care and hospice, and benefits for such services and supports that are available under this title.
`(F)(i) Subject to clause (ii), an explanation of orders regarding life sustaining treatment or similar orders, which shall include–
`(I) the reasons why the development of such an order is beneficial to the individual and the individual’s family and the reasons why such an order should be updated periodically as the health of the individual changes;
`(II) the information needed for an individual or legal surrogate to make informed decisions regarding the completion of such an order; and
`(III) the identification of resources that an individual may use to determine the requirements of the State in which such individual resides so that the treatment wishes of that individual will be carried out if the individual is unable to communicate those wishes, including requirements regarding the designation of a surrogate decisionmaker (also known as a health care proxy).
`(ii) The Secretary shall limit the requirement for explanations under clause (i) to consultations furnished in a State–
`(I) in which all legal barriers have been addressed for enabling orders for life sustaining treatment to constitute a set of medical orders respected across all care settings; and
`(II) that has in effect a program for orders for life sustaining treatment described in clause (iii).
`(iii) A program for orders for life sustaining treatment for a States described in this clause is a program that–
`(I) ensures such orders are standardized and uniquely identifiable throughout the State;
`(II) distributes or makes accessible such orders to physicians and other health professionals that (acting within the scope of the professional’s authority under State law) may sign orders for life sustaining treatment;
`(III) provides training for health care professionals across the continuum of care about the goals and use of orders for life sustaining treatment; and
`(IV) is guided by a coalition of stakeholders includes representatives from emergency medical services, emergency department physicians or nurses, state long-term care association, state medical association, state surveyors, agency responsible for senior services, state department of health, state hospital association, home health association, state bar association, and state hospice association.


Note that a “living will” or “advance care directive” is not the same thing as a “do not resuscitate” (DNR) order. A DNR is one type of advance directive, but as the page on advance directives at the National Institutes of Health makes clear, your advance directive is a choice to either accept or refuse medical care. The counseling described above is to give the patient the information they need to make that choice.

Note that the above description of “Advance Care Planning Consultation” is essentially an addendum (hhh) to an already large list of other “medical and health services” defined in Section 1861 of the Social Security Act, specifically section s(2), which defines specific things that are eligible for reimbursement ranging from the generic (hospital services) to the mind-numbingly specific (blood clotting factors for hemophilia patients). There is no coercive language whatsoever – only a list of what may be covered (and ONLY what may be covered. If it isn’t listed, it isnt covered.)

It is clear that Sarah Palin knows full well that there is no way the proposed changes can be “misinterpreted” as Sen. Grassley claims. The bottom line is that Palin is deliberately lying in order to curry favor with the “pro-life” movement, which as we saw in teh Terry Schiavo case abhors the idea of euthanasia at all costs. With Schiavo, the decision to end care was made by her husband, in the absence of a directive from Terry Schiavo herself. All the legislation is trying to do is to reimburse doctors for time spent discussing living wills with the patients, so that the patients are more likely to have a living will in place. Having a living will is a choice, and some people will choose DNRs and others will not. But that should be up to the patient in the ideal case – and knowing their wishes explicitly and legally is the best way to avoid a horrible trauma and agony for the surviving famikly members as well as ensure that the patient’s own wishes are truly respected.

Republicans claim that the Democrats are trying to deny choice, even though in this case it is they who are denying it, by scaremongering over an issue which was supposed to help patients retain their rights to make decisions about their own care. It is hypocrisy of the highest order.

The fact that Palin is outright lying on one hand about death panels, and then on the other arguing that people should “stick to the issues” on health care, is just further evidence of her intentions to try and sandbag genuine debate. And she has succeeded.

  • matoko_chan

    srsly, Sarah (when facebookers attack) Palin?
    She wants Obama to acknowledge her…..lookit meee lookit meee.
    She reached out to him and offered her help after the election……crickets.
    She challenged him to a flat race……crickets.
    She attacked him in her dopey Wapo energy op-ed…..crickets.
    She attacked Obama with twitter on the “death panels”…..crickets.
    She attacks him now on Facebook……crickets.
    He’s just gonna defang her by excising that section from the bill.
    Do you know why Obama will NEVAH acknowledge Palin?
    Michelle won’t let him…..because of this…..

    The Obama campaign was provided with reports from the Secret Service showing a sharp and disturbing increase in threats to Obama in September and early October, at the same time that many crowds at Palin rallies became more frenzied. Michelle Obama was shaken by the vituperative crowds and the hot rhetoric from the GOP candidates. “Why would they try to make people hate us?” Michelle asked a top campaign aide.

    Poor Sarah….McCain gets invited to hang at the WH with the kool kidz….nevah gonna happen for her.
    High School Never Ends in Wasilla.

  • hootie1fan

    Don’t you know that you lying (aka bearing false witness) is okay as long as you do it in the name of Jesus Christ, Ronald Reagan and the corporate wallet.

  • hootie1fan

    I wonder what Sarah Palin thinks of health insurance company death panels?

  • Your Name

    “Republicans claim that the Democrats are trying to deny choice”
    What do the Republicans think insurance companies/HMO’s have been doing for years? They routinely tell their paying clients which doctors they can see, which hospitals they can go to, which procuedures they are allowed to have (& sometimes they do it after the procedure has done leaving the patient on the hook for all those bills), etc.???????????????
    Just Google Nataline Sarkisyan

  • matoko_chan

    High School Never Ends in Wasilla
    srsly…attacking Obama with tweets and facebook?
    so high school.

  • Alicia

    After the flap over Letterman’s dumb joke about Palin’s daughter, I realized that the Palins are the sort of folks I would never ever want to have as next-door neighbors. They seem constitutionally unable to be honest about anything.

  • J Gilman

    She is not being dishonest. If the the Obama Admin. want to reform US HC how are they going to do it? Looking around the world at all other HC systems how do they do it? In almost every case HC is severely rationed. How is it rationed? Boards of administrators sit down and decide how many procedures are going to be done each year. That’s why it can take years to see a doctor in most “managed care” HC systems. Thats what she means by “death panels”. For example an alcoholic in the UK was due for a liver transplant, he was denied, by a panel, because of his drinking problems to get the new liver. He died. Nothing she said is wrong. This kind of exists with insurance companies when they decide not to cover certain procedures. Look at all the facts.

Previous Posts

Bomb blast in Karachi targets Dawoodi Bohra community
This happens almost every day in Pakistan - fanatic hirabists commit arrogant blasphemy and murder fellow Muslims in cold blood. This time, the target wa

posted 8:22:26am Mar. 20, 2015 | read full post »

Proof denies faith
On Reddit, someone posted the following question: "What convinces you that the Quran is the literal Word of God?" I think this is precisely the wrong question. The book/movie Life of Pi directly

posted 9:33:46am Mar. 13, 2015 | read full post »

Proud to be American, proud to be Muslim
This is a guest post by Safiya Dahodwala. Syedna Mufaddal Saifuddin TUS graced the land of America for the first time as the 53rd Dai (spiritual leader) of the Dawoodi Bohra Muslim community. It has been nearly a decade since his predecessor, Syedna Mohammed Burhanuddin bestowed his bountiful bl

posted 12:58:00pm Mar. 05, 2015 | read full post »

is ISIS Islamic? Wrong question.
There is an excellent longform essay on ISIS published in The Atlantic, "What does ISIS Really Want?" that lays out an excellent case fore ISIS being genuinely different in ideology, motivation and ethos than Al Qaeda. The real question boils down to, is ISIS "Islamic" or not - and makes an excellen

posted 11:34:08pm Feb. 17, 2015 | read full post »

The Price of Extremism
This is a guest post by Durriya Badani. The execution style murder of three young North Carolina students, two of whom were hijab wearing Muslim women, raises questions regarding the rise of Islamaphobia in the United States in the form of hate crimes. Some will argue that the motive for the inc

posted 11:26:53am Feb. 12, 2015 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.