City of Brass

City of Brass

Dayton mosque incident revisited

posted by Aziz Poonawalla

The case of the attack on the Dayton, OH mosque just became murkier – police have thus far found no physical evidence of the chemical irritant:

The girl was watching children whose parents and relatives had
gathered at the Islamic Society of Greater Dayton, 26 Josie St., to
celebrate Ramadan when she noticed two men standing outside a basement
window about 9:40 p.m., according to police.

One of the men then sprayed something through the open window and
into the girl’s face from a white can with a red top, according to a
police report. The girl said she immediately felt burning on her face
and felt “sick to her stomach,” the report stated.

Other children and a woman in the room felt affects from the chemical and the mosque was evacuated.

“The men didn’t say anything to her (before she was sprayed),” Biehl
said. “There was nothing left at the scene or anything that makes us
believe this is a biased crime.”

HAZMAT crews called to the scene started testing for chemicals less
than 20 minutes after a member of the mosque called 911, team
coordinator Denny Bristow said.

“Whatever chemical was released it dissipated too quickly for us to
determine what it was,” Bristow said. “We can test for about 130 to 140
chemicals, including pepper spray, and all our tests came back

Bristow said there were no chemicals found on the 10-year-old girl.

However, a discarded can of pepper spray was found near the mosque:

A can of pepper spray was found Tuesday, Sept. 30, near a local
Islamic mosque evacuated Friday after a girl inside was sprayed with a
chemical irritant.

Someone found the black can of pepper spray in a white and red bag
near the Islamic Society of Greater Dayton, 26 Josie St., and called
police, Lt. John Huber said.

Detectives are trying to lift fingerprints off the bag and can, Huber said.

It’s hard to know what to make of these new revelations. However, they do not discredit the story as told to police by the members of the congregation, they only obscure the details of the crime and the motivation behind it. It is unsurprising that no trace of the chemical was found on the girl’s face – after all, what’s the first thing you’d do if sprayed in the face by an unknown assailant? Stand around patiently waiting for HAZMAT to come take a swab? Or wash your face with cold water to try and remove the burning sensation?

Likewise, the fact that there was no trace of the chemical in the rest of the mosque is also not particularly notable. The story specifically says that the assailants sprayed the can into the girl’s face, and other members of the congregation were more mildly affected. Assuming the poor girl took the brunt of the assault, it’s not surprising that not enough of the chemical remained to do much harm to the rest of the people there. As the stories consistently note, it took the HAZMAT team 20 minutes to arrive on scene after 911 was called – note that websites selling pepper spray online explicitly state that the effects fade in 20-30 minutes, well within that time window. Unlike mace, pepper spray loses it volatility rapidly, which would also explain why only a few people were secondarily affected by the attack.

Of course, the chemical used might well have been something other than pepper spray, something which HAZMAT teams may not rotinely test for (I know that my eyes burn after casual use of Raid bug spray, for example). However, the discovery of a discarded can of pepper spray near the mosque is compelling circumstantial evidence.

There are those who will interpret the stories above, especially the first, as proof that the attack on the mosque was somehow fabricated for sympathy’s sake. This is effectively slandering the entire muslim community of Dayton, and requires them all, women and children included, to be part of some victimization-complex publicity stunt. Nothing in these new revelations undermines the claim that the mosque was attacked in any way.

As far as whether the attack qualifies as a hate crime or not, I think it’s a semantic distinction of no real importance. Whether or not the assailants are prosecuted under hate crimes law or under standard vandalism and personal injury laws is irrelevant – justice must run its course. However, if by way of analogy a similar incident had happened at a synagogue in New York (or even a church in Ankara), I don’t think there’d be any doubt in most people’s minds that it was motivated by hate. The problem with the term “hate crime” is that it’s been diluted to almost meaninglessness – for example, Patrick Buchanan invoked the term for the gradual disappearance of religious Christian symbolism from public displays, terming it “Christianophobia”. The inconsistent reporting of hate crimes also makes compilations such as the FBI’s 2006 report largely useless, except for tracking trends. The objective needs to be to find who is responsible, and prosecute them for their actions, not their intentions.

In terms of how the incident relates to the Obsession DVD, there’s certainly a climate of fear about muslims that is getting progressively worse, and it is under that climate that crimes of this sort flourish. Recall that in 2006, radio host Jerry Klein conducted an experiment on-air, musing that muslims should be forced to wear identifying marks like a crescent stitched onto their clothes. He expected that people woudl react with outrage, but instead:

The response was overwhelming “the phone lines jammed instantly”, Klein later stated that “The switchboard went from empty to totally jammed within minutes. There were plenty of callers angry with me, but there were plenty who agreed.”. While some callers said he was “off his rocker”, others insisted that his statement did not go far enough, calling for forced mass exile: “Not only do you tattoo them in the middle of their forehead but you ship them out of this country…they are here to kill us.” Others called for Muslims to be placed in concentration camps: “You have to set up encampments like during World War Two with the Japanese and Germans.”

At the end of the show he revealed that his statements were a hoax, saying “I can’t believe any of you are sick enough to have agreed for one second with anything I said. For me to suggest to tattoo marks on people’s bodies, have them wear armbands, put a crescent moon on their driver’s license on their passport or birth certificate is disgusting. It’s beyond disgusting … because basically what you just did was show me how the German people allowed what happened to the Jews to happen … We need to separate them, we need to tattoo their arms, we need to make them wear the yellow Star of David, we need to put them in concentration camps, we basically just need to kill them all because they are dangerous.” A week later, Klein also expressed surprise at how much international media coverage the story got. “You should know that I’ve received email from around the world, interview requests from the BBC and Channel 4 in England”.

That was two years ago, of course, but revealed the latent base of Islamophobia lurking beneath the surface. These sentiments rarely find mainstream outlets, but when they do, they are vociferous. Obsession and its forthcoming sequel The Third Jihad, for all the nuance their apologists invoke, tap directly into that wellspring of hate and deepens it. Don’t take my word for it – I have hosted the trailer for Obsession on this blog in the name of free speech, so watch it yourself and draw your own conclusions.

In fact, consider what the apologists for Obsession are really implying when they question the link between the movie and the attack. Is there really such a nationwide, systematic pogrom against mosques, such that the timing of the Dayton incident was truly coincidental, statistically speaking? I for one do not believe that there is such a campaign against mosques even remotely comparable to what the Jewish community faces every day, even though my own masjid in Houston was vandalized just last year. Problems with the definition of “hate crimes” aside, the FBI’s numbers do show that the overwhelming number of reported incidents  are directed against Jews, not muslims. Therefore, it is far more likely that the attack on the Dayton mosque was instigated by a recent event rather than arising naturally out of a latesnt Islamophobic impulse. The timing was too convenient to be coincidental, and only someone with deeply-entrenched prejudice could possibly suspend their common sense enough to argue otherwise.

I have argued before, and continue to believe, that Islamophpbia in America is not at a crisis point. But that doesn’t mean the problem is non-existent, nor does the difference in scale with anti-Semitism mean we should deny that the problem exists and is growing. The effective way to address it is to drop concern about the identity of the targets of hate, and simply work to publicize it and call it by name, irrespective of whom it affects. I think common cause with the Jewish community is essential in this regard – it would really b
e something amazing to see if, for example, the Anti-Defamation League were to broaden its membership and focus to muslim as well as Jewish targets. Or if CAIR (an organization that is largely ineffective at the national level, but has a lot of good people working in the state chapters) were to make a point of chronicling attacks on Jews as well as muslims. We’ve all seen this movie before, and the tactics of fascists are the same, regardless of their identity, or the identity of their victims.

As far as the Dayton incident goes, we as a community need to be patient and trust to the polie as professionals, and have faith in the system. The truth will come out and inshallah the perpetrators brought to justice soon enough.

  • jestrfyl

    I am ashamed of the fear my partners in Christ harbor and I am embarassed by it. But even more I am haunted by their ignorance. They seem to have some horrid expectations of the Qu’ran and those who read it. They do not understand how prominent Moses and especially Jesus is in the revelation given Mohammed. They do not understand that you cannot know the Qu’ran without also knowing the stories of the First Covenants and the Gospels. This preference for fear over knowledge is the very thing that allows people to behave in horrible ways.
    Though I cannot speak for the people of Dayton, on behalf of those people I serve in our church a thousand miles away, I apologize. And an apology is not enough. I promise to work at educating and opening the hearts of the people I serve in Christ’s name to the continuing grace made evident in the Qu’ran and the people whose lives are guided by it. We all need to work against hatred, violence, and fear in all of our communities.

  • Thomas Nephew

    CAIR state chapters showing solidarity with Jews when they’re victimized is a brilliant idea. It might be best if it were “organic,” i.e., preceded by contacts, during calm times, to synagogues and Jewish groups so that it’s not seen as opportunistic when the sad occasion arises. I’d suggest expanding it to other frequently hate-crimed groups as well — e.g., Blacks, gays, American Indians.

  • Kaitlin

    Thanks for sending me this. I’m putting together a post today. I’m going to link to other blogger reactions about the Dayton incident and the film itself. It’s more important, in my mind, that there’s a diversity of voices and alternatives than reiterating one-sided mainstream coverage and understandings of Islam and radicalism.

  • Abu Noor Al-Irlandee

    I’m not sure if it makes sense in terms of resources and expertise for CAIR to be catologing hate crimes against Jews and others (although it’s certainly not anything objectionable). I would note for the record that CAIR here in Chicago, and according to reports this is true of many other local chapters is active in interfaith dialogue with Jews during calmer times and has responded along with many other members of the public at large when there have been publicized incidents of anti-semitic vandalism or other “hate crimes.”
    Here’s a rundown of some ‘interfaith’ activity according to CAIR’s own website:

  • Aziz Poonawalla

    Salaam Abu Noor I am gratified to hear from you again. With respect to interfaith outreach, that’s certainly good for community ties, but the benefit of a combined catalogue of hate crimes would be more strategic in nature. I think that there’s not that much more work involved – its just monitoring the news, after all. Whatever expertise CAIR has in catalouging hate crimes against musloims is certainly applicable to same for Jews. I really think this is something that would pay dividends over the long run.

  • Denny in Dayton

    Well Aziz, you have quite a conundrum. You have made some very foolish assertions. If you would have read the news article with an open mind you would have heard the leaders of the Mosque, the police and even the Dayton Daily News say it was not a hate crime and not related to the DVD. But you would have no part of it. You are determined to find a crime even if it doesn’t exist. You have a witch hunt to fulfill. You spread hate while accusing others of spreading hate. It turns out the “criminal” the “terrorist” involved is a 10 year old boy, a member of the mosque. Now what? Do we hang him?
    I live just 4 blocks from the mosque and I am sick of the lies and accusations being spread by bloggers like yourself. Knock it off! You fell for the posting on the Daily Kos which is more than suspicious and cited it in your story. Did you bother reading this news article about that blog?
    “Rodda said she “sensationalized” the headline on her blog to draw attention.
    “I was mad, so I sort of shot from the hip,” Rodda said, adding she has not talked to any law enforcement agencies, hospital officials or Islamic Center president Dr. Tarek Sabagh. She said her information came from people who know some people that attend the mosque.”
    Shot from the hip? She shot herself in the foot and now all of you who cited this bit of nonsense look very foolish. My neighborhood meeting is tonight and I’m hoping we will have someone from the Dayton PD there to give us the straight facts. Perhaps even Dr. Sabagh will be there. Again knock it off!

  • Cat

    “Nothing in these new revelations undermines the claim that the mosque was attacked in any way.”
    By whom, though?
    Police have questioned a 10-year-old boy about the alleged attack. His family are members of the mosque.

  • Lynn
  • Dean Esmay

    Well, if I read it right, there’s nothing odd about the fact that they didn’t find any chemicals–there’s not much reason they would in a case like this–but it does seem plausible that this was a prank by a young boy and nothing more. I don’t know if we’ll ever see more in the press or not, although I’d like to.

Previous Posts

is ISIS Islamic? Wrong question.
There is an excellent longform essay on ISIS published in The Atlantic, "What does ISIS Really Want?" that lays out an excellent case fore ISIS being genuinely different in ideology, motivation and ethos than Al Qaeda. The real question boils down to, is ISIS "Islamic" or not - and makes an excellen

posted 11:34:08pm Feb. 17, 2015 | read full post »

The Price of Extremism
This is a guest post by Durriya Badani. The execution style murder of three young North Carolina students, two of whom were hijab wearing Muslim women, raises questions regarding the rise of Islamaphobia in the United States in the form of hate crimes. Some will argue that the motive for the inc

posted 11:26:53am Feb. 12, 2015 | read full post »

Can atheism drive someone to murder? #muslimlivesmatter #chapelhillshooting
Like everyone else, I am in shock at the horrible tragedy in North Carolina last night, where three young Muslim Americans were brutally executed. The police are investigating and the murderer is in custody and cooperating. The family of the victims will hold a press conference soon, until then I am

posted 4:21:58pm Feb. 11, 2015 | read full post »

Halal Italian and Mexican catering in Chicago
This is a guest post by Whitney Gaspar. I am not Muslim. I am not any religion, really. I was baptized as a Catholic to please my grandma and raised as an atheist by my mother. I am spiritual and I believe in God. But that is not why I eat halal. I eat halal because it is logical. It simpl

posted 11:09:45am Feb. 09, 2015 | read full post »

the State of the Ummah, 2014/1436
I tuned into President Obama's 2014 SOTU for a while last week - mainly beca

posted 12:06:37pm Jan. 26, 2015 | read full post »

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.