David Barton & the 'Myth' of Church-State Separation
The Bush campaign has hired a controversial activist who calls the U.S. a 'Christian nation'
BY: Deborah Caldwell
In aJuly 2002 interview
on Pat Robertson's Christian Broadcasting Network, Barton had the following exchange:
Robertson: "The question is asked, was America founded as a Christian nation? We have said yes, yes, yes. But you have the proof."
Barton: "There is a lot of proof. Not the least of which is a great Fourth of July speech that was given in 1837 by one of the guys who fought in the revolution, who became a president, John Quincy Adams. His question was why is it in America that the Fourth of July and Christmas are the most celebrated holidays? His answer was that at Christmas we celebrate what Jesus Christ did for the world [with] his birth, and on the Fourth of July we celebrate what Jesus Christ did for America, since we founded it as a Christian nation."
The lunches are coordinated by the RNC's evangelical outreach director, Drew Ryun. "He and I make it very clear we are not partisan per se, we're biblical," says Barton. But according to Federal Election Commission filings, Barton has earned $12,000 this year from the RNC for "political consulting." A spokesman for the RNC, Scott Hoganson, did not respond to questions about Barton.
Barton contends that the IRS allows pastors to endorse candidates from the pulpit as long as they make it clear it's their own personal opinion and not an official church endorsement.
In an interview with Beliefnet this week, Barton said, "I show them the historical role of pastors being involved in civil government. I show them the Biblical basis for pastors being involved in civil government, and then I show them the issues that are at stake from a biblical point of view and the voting records that pertain to those [issues]." At that point in his presentation, he passes out aJune 10 letter from the Internal Revenue Service
explaining what ministers are able to say and do, legally, in their churches.
"They're shocked by what they can do," says Barton.
Barton said prominent evangelical pastors and leaders met with House and Senate leadership in February to complain about a letter the IRS had put out in January. The letter cautioned ministers against talking about anything that someday might become a political issue. According to Barton, the pastors read the letter and said, "My God, what am I, a prophet? How do I know what's going to become a political issue?" As a result, the ministers pressured the Congressional leadership, which, Barton said, in turn "pressured" the IRS to reissue a letter clarifying the rules.
According to Barton's reading of the law, it is legal for a pastor to stand up in the pulpit and say, "'Now look, I'm going to tell you something--and the church didn't vote on this and the elder board hasn't gotten together on it--but I'm telling you, John Kerry is not fit to be president.' He can do that, that's fine. The pastor has the right of free speech, but he cannot bring the corporate machinery to bear."
Meanwhile, says Barton, a pastor can talk about any issue he wants to. If he wants to preach against same-sex marriage or abortion, he can. And he can talk about the voting records of individuals or groups on those matters.
Of course, how a minister describes the issues is what makes the situation tricky. "It's very clear in the party platforms that one party does support traditional marriage and opposes abortion and supports school prayer--and the other opposes that," Barton says. And that makes Republican candidates the obvious choices. "This is your logical home if you're concerned about Biblical issues," Barton says.