Katherine Paterson is the author of over 20 books for children, two of which have won the Newbery Medal. Her novels--including "Bridge to Terabithia" and "The Great Gilly Hopkins"--have been praised for their insight into the psychology of children and for their rich imaginative scope. Paterson spoke with Beliefnet about "Finding Neverland," a movie which tells the story of "Peter Pan" author J.M. Barrie and his friendship with a bereaved mother and her four young sons.

The movie "Finding Neverland," like many children's books, focuses on the value of play. In it, J.M. Barrie, the author of "Peter Pan," joins children in creating imaginary worlds. What did you think of the movie?

I loved the way it moved from the world of everyday into fantasy. It dealt with the very difficult issue of death and grieving, but did so in a cathartic way, wrenching the tears out of you--but at the end, you felt cleansed and hopeful. And Johnny Depp is one of the few American actors who can truly act. He truly enters in to the person he's portraying. Peter Pan takes the play of children-playing Indians, pirates, fairies--and turns in into fantasy. Every child imagines that he or she can fly. So what Barrie did was take things that are very natural to the play of children and incorporate them into a fantasy for children, so you were sort of seeing your own play turned into art. In the movie, becoming deeply involved in this play world of Indians and pirates is shown as a way to deal with tragedy or suffering in real life. Do you think that creating imaginary worlds is escapism, or does it perform a healing function? Or both?

I think it's probably both. All of us use art and literature as an escape from time to time-but if it's any good, it has a healing quality, a quality that enlarges our human spirits. In your books as in the movie, children grapple with grief. I'm thinking of your book "Bridge to Terabithia," where children create a fantasy world. How does this idea of a fantasy world help people through death and grief? Well, death is very mysterious to us. One moment someone is there with us, and the next moment they're not. It's hard for us to conceive that that's the end, so our imagination immediately begins to try to comfort us. Of course, all of the religions in the world have used that. I'm not saying it's true or not true, I happen to believe it's true. But even if it's not true I think it would serve a comforting function. The problem with people who are afraid of imagination, of fantasy, is that their world becomes so narrow that I don't see how they can imagine beyond what their senses can verify. We know from science that there are entire worlds that our senses can't verify. In the old days, your senses couldn't verify that the world was round. So if we say it's not there because I can't see or touch or feel it, we're just like the people in pre-scientific days who did not believe that the world was round. So fantasy serves a function in helping us to expand our consciousness so that we can begin to conceive of things that we can't actually perceive. I try to read modern physics and they all sound like poets and mythologists. I think somebody asked Einstein how to help a son become a great scientist and he said, "Read him the great myths. Expand his imagination." That reminds me of some of the adults in the movie who were embarrassed by Barrie's childishness or playfulness. In some ways, they were the limited ones.

They were the limited ones. And it was a genius move, which I hope is historical, getting the orphans to come to the show [the premier of Barrie's play "Peter Pan"] and planting them in the audience. I thought it was brilliant. I wonder if it's true myself.

I wouldn't be at all surprised. He had sense enough to know that the stuffy audiences who would pay the equivalent of Broadway prices to come to the show weren't going to respond at all unless they were given permission to by the children sitting alongside them. There was a powerful scene in the movie where the mother, played by Kate Winslet, walks into "Neverland." What did you think of that?

I'm still pondering it, really. The movie was always moving from what we call reality into fantasy. I remember at one point, Peter, the skeptic, says, "it's only a dog" of Barrie's dog and he said, "only a dog?!" And he turns into a bear on screen because the children have been willing to imagine that his dog is a bear. In the language that the movie had set up, just moving fairly seamlessly from reality into the fantasy world, then her walking into Neverland worked. And then it brings you right back to harsh reality because Peter's angry again and feels betrayed when he did. It seems like the things that Barrie was offering the grief-stricken children in the movie--encouraging Peter to write or playing with the kids--was more therapeutic than having just some sort of somber conversation.

I think he was doing a very good job. A friend of mine works with grieving children and a lot of what she does is in art-getting them to draw pictures and write stories. Getting them to talk about the person they've lost, draw pictures about the person they've lost. That gives her an entrée into helping them express it verbally what they're going through. The whole theme of maturity and growing up is in your books and in the movies as well. What do you think is real maturity?

I guess real maturity, which most of us never achieve, is when you realize that you're not the center of the universe. So that almost automatically disqualifies children in some ways.

It does, because they are the center of the universe. But gradually they begin to sense other people's feelings and other people's lives. Part of growing up is being able to see the importance of other people for themselves, not just for what they are to you. People have praised your books for really getting inside the head of different children. Do you think the way children's lives and their fantasy lives are portrayed these days is accurate?

The thing that distresses me most about children today is how little time they have for creating their personal fantasies and living out of their imaginations. People talk about them being overscheduled. There's soccer practice, and more...

Yes, everything seems to have a structure and an adult's always in charge. When I was a child, we played. I moved a lot as a child and initially would not have friends. My older brother and sister had each other and didn't really want to play with me much. So I spent a lot of time playing by myself. I would just create these elaborate games and I would be all the people and play all the parts in them.
I can remember one time I came into the house and my mother and some of her friends were having tea in the living room. I stood outside the door listening to them and they were all talking, talking, talking. It hit me like a stone in my heart that I was going to grow up to be a person who only wanted to talk. I was so depressed. I thought, that's all they want to do. They don't want to play. Play for me was imaginative play, it wasn't structured games and things. Since I've been talking to you, I've been thinking, "Well, I am still playing." You're still thinking up worlds.

Yeah. I'm doing just as I did when I was a child. So I didn't turn into one of those people that I was so horrified by.

So you beat the odds.

Yeah, people whose vocation is a creative vocation are very fortunate in that regard. They get to play.

more from beliefnet and our partners
Close Ad