You can read the details here. Here’s a link to the show so you can listen to it yourself. He talks about Tim Russert first (the Obama discussion begins at 10:56).
I wanted to blog on this issue but I don’t have time this morning. I plan to do so tonight. I think this is issue is one of the things that we need to get right as Christians and I believe Obama got it right when he said this:

Democracy demands that the religiously motivated translate their concerns into universal, rather than religion-specific, values. It requires that their proposals be subject to argument, and amenable to reason. I may be opposed to abortion for religious reasons, but if I seek to pass a law banning the practice, I cannot simply point to the teachings of my church or evoke God’s will. I have to explain why abortion violates some principle that is accessible to people of all faiths, including those with no faith at all.
Now this is going to be difficult for some who believe in the inerrancy of the Bible, as many evangelicals do. But in a pluralistic democracy, we have no choice. Politics depends on our ability to persuade each other of common aims based on a common reality. It involves the compromise, the art of what’s possible. At some fundamental level, religion does not allow for compromise. It’s the art of the impossible. If God has spoken, then followers are expected to live up to God’s edicts, regardless of the consequences. To base one’s life on such uncompromising commitments may be sublime, but to base our policy making on such commitments would be a dangerous thing.

Shocked that I would agree with Obama? Didn’t see that coming did ya?

More from Beliefnet and our partners
Close Ad