Thank you for visiting Mormon Inquiry. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Most Recent Mormon Story on Beliefnet Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!
According to a recent AP story, Bob Jones University has issued a statement apologizing for its past race policies. Before 1971 it did not admit black students and there was a school policy against interracial dating until 2000. The full document, “Statement About Race at Bob Jones University,” makes interesting reading. Hard to decide whether to cringe or applaud.
On the applause side, BJU deserves credit for updating its policies and, in this statement, actually apologizing for its prior policies.
BJU’s history has been chiefly characterized by striving to achieve those goals; but like any human institution, we have failures as well. For almost two centuries American Christianity, including BJU in its early stages, was characterized by the segregationist ethos of American culture. Consequently, for far too long, we allowed institutional policies regarding race to be shaped more directly by that ethos than by the principles and precepts of the Scriptures. We conformed to the culture rather than provide a clear Christian counterpoint to it.
In so doing, we failed to accurately represent the Lord and to fulfill the commandment to love others as ourselves. For these failures we are profoundly sorry. Though no known antagonism toward minorities or expressions of racism on a personal level have ever been tolerated on our campus, we allowed institutional policies to remain in place that were racially hurtful.
The cringing comes for an LDS reader familiar with the history of racial policies in the LDS Church. The policy denying the LDS priesthood to males of African descent was reversed in 1978 and added to the LDS scriptures as Official Declaration — 2 in the Doctrine and Covenants. It is a celebratory document, and perhaps it should be so. But the continuing failure to publish any sort of apology for prior LDS racial policies still grates on some people. The implicit claim — that there was really nothing wrong with the prior LDS race policy — unfortunately supports the persistence of unfounded and offensive racial folk doctrine among the general membership of the LDS Church. It seems like the action of BJU in publicly admitting the error of its prior policy is an example of the right way to fully repudiate such a policy.