Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!
We turn now to Calvin’s arguments from the early church (Institutes of the Christian Religion).
Infants, Calvin argues, are not in the same class. It seems to me that Calvin is arguing that adult conversions are more like Gentile conversions where catechism at some level was first required. Infants are another class. Special pleading. The original argument has yet to be addressed. Why are infants not mentioned?
He next appeals, which to me is the big argument for Calvin, to Abraham’s vs. Isaac’s examples: Abraham believed and then circumcised; Isaac was circumcised first. Here’s his best statement so far:
“… if the children of believers are partakers in the covenant without the help of understanding, there is no reason why they should be barred from the sign merely because they cannot swear to the provisions of the covenant” (1347). The Anabaptist will simply respond: “Show me the NT infants are ‘partakers in the covenant’.” I assume Calvin would point to 1 Cor 7.
Next, Calvin responds to those passages offered by Anabaptists as counter evidence.