Potleaf.jpgThe Justice Department has laid out new guidelines stating that, in states where marijuana is legal for medical use, neither suppliers nor patients should be targeted for prosecution.

What’s really new about this? Well, contrary to Bush era tactics, which continued to enforce federal laws against mary jane usage despite what states decided (interesting, considering the Bushies’ general stance on state’s rights), now it’s apparently not worth the feds’ time to go after those who use or supply pot for medical purposes, so long as they’re complying with the laws in their own states.
So… what do we think? Are these groovy new times, or…


…are we opening the door for all sorts of immorality to start flooding into our otherwise upstanding nation? 

Some of what I read suggests that the potential drawbacks of laxer prosecution aren’t simply “OMG, our kids will think we’re OK with them smoking weed!” but also that we’re encouraging drug cartels’ business by not pursuing as many cases under the new guidelines.
Me? I think marijuana should be subject to the same laws as alcohol. The way I see it, they’re similarly dangerous–so regulate pot, make it aboveboard, (or, if that’s too radical, available by prescription only in every state), remove the stigma, take the drug cartels out of the equation. Oh, and also, how about making alcohol a bit harder for kids to get, while we’re at it? Or at least educating them better about its dangers? 
However, for the sake of argument, I’ll point out that the Christian Science Monitor thinks folks like me have rather insidious beliefs and disagrees about how slippery that slope of legalizing marijuana really is.
On the whole, the mercy being done seems to outweigh, in my mind, the dangers to society. Marijuana has proven medical benefits that 14 states have agreed make it the best option for patients with no other recourse. Even if we never legalize the drug for any other purpose, I think the Justice Department took a step in the right direction by dialing down the hysteria over medical marijuana. 
What do you think? I’m admittedly a little naive about this issue, as I neither smoke nor drink.

Subscribe to receive updates from Everyday Ethics or follow us on Twitter!
More from Beliefnet and our partners
previous posts

Thank you for visiting Everyday Ethics. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Idol Chatter Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!

Internet activist and New York Times bestselling author of The Filter Bubble: What the Internet Is Hiding from You, Eli Pariser is concerned that information gatekeepers of the past (i.e. editors/reporters) have been replaced by algorithms that individually tailor information based upon a host of variables that are being collected from you with or without your […]

Coca-cola has been accused of “propping up a notorious Swaziland dictator” whose human rights abuses and bilking of the national wealth has long been criticized by human rights activists. According to Guardian UK reporter David Smith**, Swaziland’s King Mswati III is Africa’s last absolute monarch whose personal wealth is gleaned in part from taxes paid […]

I know it’s become popular, but I’ve become suspect of using traditional goal-setting strategies and business process techniques to change personal habits and pursue a meaningful life. While I can admit that there’s something invigorating–even exciting–about casting a new vision, writing that list of goals and objectives and getting a fresh start, I also know […]

Close Ad