Roseanne, one of the most popular series of all time and the most highly rated show at the present moment, has been unceremoniously cancelled by ABC because of a single tweet—a “racist” tweet, according to everyone in Big Media, including and tellingly Big Conservative media—fired off by its leading lady.

Roseanne Barr tweeted on Tuesday that Valerie Jarrett, senior adviser to Barack Obama, looked like the offspring of the Muslim Brotherhood and The Planet of the Apes.

Jarrett, as it turns out (and this was news to some of us) has some African ancestry. Thus, Barr’s ape reference in connection with Jarrett has been ruled by Respectable Society as an act of—what else?—racism!

Not only is this an act of racism, it is an unequivocal act of racism. It’s racist-“hate!”

Those in Big Conservative media are busy complaining (as usual) about “the double standards” of their leftist counterparts.  Yet they have been just as tenacious in condemning Barr for her “racist” tweet as the latter.

Some thoughts:

First, there is a vast, omnipresent industry in this country that few people are willing to recognize for what it is: the Racism-Industrial-Complex (RIC).  The agents and profiteers of RIC absolutely need to further the perception that what they call “racism” is an incorrigible, “systemic,” “structural,” or “institutional” feature of daily American life.  The term “racism,” though spoken of as if it had a unitary, self-evident meaning, is used in wildly disparate contexts: From Nazis to the Klan to Paula Deen and, now, Roseanne Barr, apparently, a racist is a racist is a racist.

Obviously, however, a term that’s been made this elastic has been divested of meaning. A definition is in order.  But this is exactly the point:

The Titans of RIC—activists, academics, Diversity consultants, politicians, and a whole lot of other folks—cannot permit closer inspection of “racism.”  The term must remain chameleonic. Its value derives precisely from its abstract character, its readiness to be enlisted in the service of the cause of the day.

We cannot approach this controversy within which Barr has embroiled herself without understanding it in the light of RIC, an industry more immense than any other and from which untold numbers of people regularly reap benefits of every conceivable sort.

Second, contrary to the conventional wisdom, Barr’s tweet was not obviously racially-charged, let alone “racist.”

For starters, she remarked on Wednesday that she didn’t even know that Jarrett was black.  This is eminently credible, for neither did I know that Jarret is (partially) black.  In any event, it’s far from clear that she is of any African ancestry. This being said, if it’s not “racist” to liken Ronald Reagan, George W. Bush, and Donald Trump to monkeys, since they are not black, then shouldn’t it follow that neither is the same kind of remark aimed at a person who is believed to be non-black “racist?”

Furthermore, let’s suppose that Barr knew that Jarrett was black.  So what?  Unlike “nigger,” which has a history explicitly, uniquely peculiar to blacks, derogatory monkey references to humans have no such history.  It could’ve easily been the case that Barr likened to an ape, not a black woman, but a woman who happened to be black.

In calling Jarrett, who in no clear way possesses any Afro-centric features, the offspring of apes Barr could’ve intended to call attention to what she took to be Jarrett’s unattractiveness, or maybe her incompetence or idiocy. That is, she could’ve been motivated by the same sorts of considerations that animate the critics of Reagan, Bush, Trump, and other whites to mock them through ape analogies.

Third, the readiness with which the elites of Respectable Society, in one voice, convicted Barr of the worst of offenses of which a white person can be convicted in today’s world, requires either an inability or an unwillingness to think through this issue all of the two minutes that it takes.  Doubtless, many talkers and scribblers are not especially bright.  Others, though, are driven first and foremost by their aching desire to be accepted by the Politically Correct Master Class, that Respectable Society of which they consider themselves members.

Fourth, the speed with which Roseanne Barr, of all people, is being reduced to persona non grata over this one incident is a revealing commentary on the times.  She is among the most famous living people, a female Jewish Democrat who infamously grabbed her crotch during the playing of the national anthem decades ago. She is no conservative and but a qualified Trump-supporter whose new show is hardly the reactionary statement that her right-leaning admirers have made it out to be.

And everyone knows it.

To prove that they are not simply trying to ingratiate themselves to the agents of RIC, that they aren’t virtue-signaling, all of those who are now trying to distance themselves from Barr should forego every penny that she ever made them.  Those at ABC, as well as her fellow cast members and those who worked behind the scenes for her show, should pledge to return every penny of the blood money that they earned courtesy of this frothing-at-the-mouth Racist!

For the record, I’ve never been a fan of Roseanne Barr, and I’ve never been among Roseanne’s viewers.  But the truth is the truth, and the truth is that the Racism-Industrial-Complex is a juggernaut that never sleeps.

Roseanne is just the latest one of its prey.  

More from Beliefnet and our partners
previous posts

Martial Arts as War (MAW) and Martial Arts as Sport (MAS)—these are the two paradigms that, by and large, define the contemporary universe of the martial arts. Or so I have argued in previous essays. Now, it’s true, of course, that—as my own Master-Instructor observed to me in one of our countless conversations over this […]

As I was at pains to show in a previous essay, far too many self-defense instructors within the world of the martial arts ignore the contextual considerations that inform every training modality. There is, however, one system that recognizes that—to paraphrase Pindar, the lyric poet quoted by the ancient Greek historian Herodotus—context is king. The […]

In a previous essay, I noted that the vast majority of human beings, irrespectively of their circumstances of place and time, uncritically embrace whatever the prevailing paradigm happens to be. As long as “the Experts” inform (or misinform) them of X, they, without thinking twice, accept that X is indeed true. Matters are no different […]

The idea of systemic racism is one that has been critiqued in this column in the past. That being said, it is worth noting that if ever the case for systemic racism could be made, it is now, in the era of COVID as Social Distancing protocols, mask mandates, and vaccine mandates have been imposed […]