This is a very disturbing article, and explains the oddness of some of Paul’s “libertarian” positions.  He supports states’ rights to do all manner of nasty stuff, including making drugs illegal.  He only supports freedom from the National government.  If I am wrong, spare me rhetoric and send me examples.  If this article is correct, Paul is in no significant sense a libertarian. Rather he is an enemy of freedom.

More from Beliefnet and our partners