Virtual Talmud

Virtual Talmud


Whose Right to Life?

Judaism is a pro-life religion. It sees all life as precious, including the potential life represented in the fetus. The stirring of life is a miracle, a gift from God. All things being equal, a fetus should be brought to term and welcomed into life.

However, what happens when the fetus poses a threat to the life or health of its mother? Jewish law is unambiguous: The mother’s life and health take precedence. Why? The medieval Jewish sage Rashi (1040-1105) explains that the fetus is not a person. According to Jewish law, personhood begins at birth (defined as when the head or majority of the body exits the mother into the air) and not before. When their needs conflict, the actual or independent life takes precedence over the potential life.

Maimonides offers a different explanation: the fetus is a rodef, a pursuer, endangering the mother, and thus it must be stopped by force, if necessary, even at the cost of its “life.”

Both views are helpful in light of the current debate over abortion, and by extension, the nomination of Judge Alito to the Supreme Court.

Rashi reminds us that different religions define human life differently. The Catholic Church and Christian Right, who are driving legislative efforts to restrict abortion, ultimately want abortion outlawed, because they define human life as beginning with conception. Protecting choice, then, is part of protecting freedom of religion and the separation of church and state. That is why Judaism’s Conservative Movement, while not pro-abortion, is pro-choice, and is a member of the Religious Coalition for Reproductive Choice.

Judge Alito’s former clerk, Jeffrey Wasserstein, argued in a recent op-ed piece that Jews have nothing to worry about from Alito’s stand on freedom of religion. That may or may not be so. However, we have plenty to worry about regarding whether he will protect a woman’s life and health.

Maimonides’ position reminds us that the lives and health of real woman are at stake in the abortion debate.

Take the small percentage of women who learn late in their pregnancy that their fetuses have severe hydrocephaly (swelling of the brain). Such a fetus will not survive, and the woman cannot survive giving birth because the fetal head is too large. The safest procedure is an intact d and x (inaccurately labeled a “partial-birth abortion”). However, unless the law banning this procedure is struck down by the Supreme Court, these women face the much more dangerous hysterotomy, requiring a larger incision than a caesarean and carrying such a high morbidity rate that the procedure was largely dropped once the intact d and x was developed. If these women survive this outmoded surgery, they face the likelihood of never being able to carry another pregnancy. because of the danger of uterine rupture.

Maimonides, as a doctor and a rabbi, would rule that the health of these women takes precedence in this tragic situation. Judge Alito probably would not agree, based upon his dissenting opinion on Planned Parenthood v. Casey, where he argued that the needs of a small minority of women are insufficient to be considered “undue hardship” in terms of the constitutional protections limiting restrictions on abortion. (The Washington Post‘s Nov. 7, 2005, editorial provides a clear explanation of the disturbing meaning of this opinion.)

Our concerns are even greater in the case of parental notification (also currently before the Supreme Court in Ayotte v. Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, a challenge to New Hampshire’s parental notification law). In the best of all situations, we would want a minor under 18 to inform her parents. However, what happens to the young woman from an abusive home? What if she is having a medical emergency?

If every human life is really precious, then shouldn’t the lives of these women (and the married women in abusive relationships excluded by Alito in the Casey case) be equally precious regardless of aggregate numbers involved? Whose right to life are we talking about here?

The Supreme Court will be deciding the legality of legislation that endangers real women’s right to life. Do we want that decision made by someone who does not value the right to life of every individual woman? I sure don’t.

The question is not only whether or not Judge Alito would overturn Roe v. Wade (as important a question as that is), but also whether, with him on the bench, the court will remain the last recourse and protection against the abuse of legislative or executive power and the tyranny of the majority of the minority.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(3)
post a comment
eastcoastlady

posted January 14, 2006 at 3:07 am


Great, balanced thoughts.



report abuse
 

michael Sita

posted January 17, 2006 at 2:13 am


The farce the polticos have made of the elections (not differentiating a democracy from a republic) and the polarization of the two parties and selection of the candidates is further empahjsized by this process for the Supreme COurt. Entrapment by arguement and literally shouting epitets is not an arguement and the apology being disguised as an answer allows the listener to wonder if this is a tennis match or a search for “judicial prudence , justice and outrageously truth either relative or absolute–but Truth.



report abuse
 

sylvia

posted January 17, 2006 at 5:30 pm


Great article. I agree with you completly. I feel like we are the frogs that are in the water that is very slowly being warmed. Everything is happing very slowly, little by little that no one realizes how many of our human rights are being taken away even under the guise of national security….fear allows people to give up their rights if they feel that they will receive protection in return. Women especially are loosing their rights. The right to choose what to do with our bodys. Are we not mature enough to make thoes decesions? What about young girls? Should 13 year old girls give up the right to grow up and have a second chance? Should crack babies be born so mothers can dump them in the dumpsters after giving birth in some alley? It is not for me to judge what another human does with their body… i do not understand why no one seems to make a big fuss over the people that are already living,,,What about all the men in Iraq that are loosing there lives daily….Are not their lives more important than un-born babies? Why aren’t people fighting for the right for them to live?



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

The Task Is Never Finished
It has been heartwarming to read the warm responses to Rabbi Waxman's post asking Beliefnet to reconsider its decision to cancel Virtual Talmud. Virtual Talmud offered an alternative model for internet communications: civil discourse pursued in postings over a time frame of days (rather than moments

posted 12:31:46pm Apr. 03, 2008 | read full post »

Some Parting Reflections
Well, loyal readers, all good things must come to an end and we’ve been informed that this particular experiment in blogging as a forum for creating wide-ranging discussion on topics of interest to contemporary Jews has run its course. Maybe it’s that blogging doesn’t lend itself so well to t

posted 1:00:29pm Mar. 31, 2008 | read full post »

Obama's Lesson and The Jewish Community
There are few times in this blog’s history when I have felt that Rabbi Grossman was one hundred percent correct in her criticisms of my ideas. However, a few weeks ago she called me out for citing a few crack websites on Barak Obama’s advisors. She was right. I never should have cited those web

posted 12:09:08pm Mar. 31, 2008 | read full post »

The Future of Race Relations
As a post-baby boomer, it is interesting to me to see how much of today’s conversation about racial relations is still rooted in the 1960s experience and rhetoric of the civil rights struggle, and the disenchantment that followed. Many in the black and Jewish communities look to this period either

posted 4:04:41pm Mar. 25, 2008 | read full post »

Wright and Wrong of Race and Jews
Years ago, as a rabbinical student, I was one of a group of rabbinical students who visited an African American seminary in Atlanta. My fellow rabbinical students and I expected an uplifting weekend of interfaith sharing like we had experienced in visits to other (largely white) seminaries. We were

posted 12:50:11pm Mar. 24, 2008 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.