Via Media

Via Media


On the Synod

posted by awelborn

Some articles on the working document (which is not yet in English) and the process:

First, when we talk of this "Synod," what are we talking about?

An explanation from the Vatican website

The Synod of Bishops is a permanent institution established by Pope Paul VI, 15 September 1965, in response to the desire of the Fathers of the Second Vatican Council to keep alive the spirit of collegiality engendered by the conciliar experience.

Literally speaking the word "synod", derived from two Greek words syn meaning "together" and hodos meaning "road" or "way", means a "coming together". A Synod is a religious meeting or assembly at which bishops, gathered around and with the Holy Father, have opportunity to interact with each other and to share information and experiences, in the common pursuit of pastoral solutions which have a universal validity and application. The Synod, generally speaking, can be defined as an assembly of bishops representing the Catholic episcopate, having the task of helping the Pope in the governing of the universal Church by rendering their counsel. Pope John Paul II has referred to the Synod as "a particularly fruitful expression and instrument of the collegiality of bishops".

The principal characteristic of the Synod of Bishops is service to the communion and collegiality of the world’s bishops with the Holy Father. It is not a particular organism with limited competence as that of the Roman Congregations and Councils. Instead, it has full competence to deal with any subject in accordance with the procedure established by the Holy Father in the letter of convocation. The Synod of Bishops with its permanent General Secretariat is not part of the Roman Curia and does not depend on it; it is subject directly and solely to the Holy Father, with whom it is united in the universal government of the Church.

Though the institution of the Synod of Bishops is permanent in character, its actual functioning and concrete collaboration are not. In other words, the Synod of Bishops meets and operates only when the Holy Father considers it necessary or opportune to consult the episcopate, which at a synodal gathering, expresses its “opinion on very important and serious subjects” (Paul VI, Address to Cardinals, 24 June 1967). The task of every synodal Assembly shares in the collegial character which the episcopate can offer to the Holy Father. Through the Holy Father’s acceptance of the advice or the decisions of a given Assembly, the episcopate exercises a collegial activity which approaches but does not equal that manifested at an Ecumenical Council. This is a direct result of various factors: the ensured representation of the whole episcopate, the convocation by the Holy Father and “the unity of the episcopate, which, in order to be one, requires that there be a Head of the College” (John Paul II, Pastores Gregis, 56), who is first in the episcopal order.

So, this fall’s Synod was announced by Pope John Paul II when he declared The Year of the Eucharist, and was planned to be a fitting end to that year.

The plans for the Synod are described in this Zenit article, this CWN article and this CNS article.

(I’m sure John Allen will have more in the Word from Rome on Friday. I’ll be on the road…so someone post a link when it comes up. Usually late morning)

From the Zenit article:

The 11th Ordinary General Assembly of the Synod of Bishops will be shorter in duration than the preceding ones, lasting three weeks, and not a whole month, as Pope John Paul II first planned.

The decision was made by Benedict XVI, not only to "favor the bishops’ stay in their sees," but also to foster "greater concentration" during the discussions.

…The open discussions will be moderated by the presidents delegate of the synod: Cardinal Francis Arinze, of the Congregation for Divine Worship and the Sacraments; Cardinal Juan Sandoval Íñiguez, of Guadalajara, Mexico; and Cardinal Telesphore Toppo, of Ranchi, India.

…"It is hoped that the proposals will not repeat the traditional doctrine of the Church, but that they will be oriented to fostering a renewal of the pastoral application and liturgical celebration of the sacrament of the Eucharist in the universal Church," said Archbishop Eterovic.

Here’s what I’m liking about Benedict. Well, one of the things: he seems to be the model of efficiency. (Insert German joke here. I won’t.) But really. He seems to me to be very much a 78-year old man who has watched curial and episcopal doings for decades, knows the score and knows that he doesn’t have all the time in the world to take care of business. Get to work, don’t waste time, don’t restate the obvious, but figure out how we can bring what we know is true all the more powerfully to the people, to help them encounter Christ and know the joy of faith.

The page with the links to the documents for this synod. None of which are in English yet.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(6)
post a comment
Kevin Miller

posted July 8, 2005 at 4:47 am


Insert German joke here. I won’t.
I’ll do that and more:
In heaven, the English are the policemen, the Germans are the engineers, the Italians are the cooks, the French are the lovers, and the Swiss coordinate everything.
In hell, the Germans are the policemen, the French are the engineers, the English are the cooks, the Swiss are the lovers, and the Italians coordinate everything.



report abuse
 

ajb

posted July 8, 2005 at 10:08 am


It’s nice to know that when I find myself frustrated an unable to suffer the incessant b.s. of long meetings and long-winded committees, I’m being absolutely Papal.



report abuse
 

Zhou

posted July 8, 2005 at 12:32 pm


The “Instrumentum Laboris” is now available in English.



report abuse
 

Caroline

posted July 8, 2005 at 5:23 pm


As they say: Benedikt, Gott geschickt.



report abuse
 

Sean Casey

posted July 8, 2005 at 7:43 pm


Uh-oh.
This part is going to raise a few hackles:
72. Various responses have insisted on the relationship between the Eucharist and the moral life, pointing to a significant awareness of the importance of the moral duty flowing from the reception of Holy Communion. Many refer to the fact that too many receive the Sacrament without having sufficiently reflected on their moral state in life.100 Some receive Communion while denying the teachings of the Church or publicly supporting immoral choices in life, such as abortion, without thinking that they are committing an act of grave personal dishonesty and causing scandal. Some Catholics do not understand why it might be a sin to support a political candidate who is openly in favour of abortion or other serious acts against life, justice and peace. Such attitudes lead to, among other things, a crisis in the meaning of belonging to the Church and in a clouding of the distinction between venial and mortal sin.
Watch out! Fur about to fly!



report abuse
 

Greg Hessel

posted July 9, 2005 at 5:28 pm


What are you talking about Amy? How can you dislike restating traditional Catholic doctrine on the Eucharist when 90% of Catholics don’t even know it?



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

There is nothing I shall want
A couple of weeks ago, a memorial Mass for Michael was held here in Birmingham at the Cathedral. The bishop presided and offered a very nice, even charming homily in which he first focused on the Scripture readings of the day, and then turned to Michael, whom he remembered, among other things, as on

posted 9:24:16am Mar. 05, 2009 | read full post »

Revolutionary Road - Is it just me?
Why am I the only person I know..or even "know" in the Internet sense of "knowing"  - who didn't hate it? I didn't love it, either. There was a lot wrong with it. Weak characterization. Miscasting. Anvil-wielding mentally ill prophets.But here's the thing.Whether or not Yates' original novel in

posted 9:45:04pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Books for Lent
No, I'm not going to ask you about your Lenten reading lists...although I might.Not today, though. This post is about giving books to others. For Lent, and a long time after that. You know how it goes during Lent: Prayer, Fasting and Almsgiving, right?Well, here's a worthy recipient for your hard-

posted 9:22:07pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Why Via Media
How about....because I'm lame and hate thinking up titles to things? No?Okay...how about...St. Benedict? Yes, yes, I know the association with Anglicanism. That wasn't invovled in my purpose in naming the joint, but if draws some Googling Episcopalians, all the better.To tell the truth, you can bl

posted 8:54:17pm Mar. 04, 2009 | read full post »

Brave Heart?
I don't know about you, but one of effects of childbirth on me was a compulsion to spill the details. All of them.The whole thing was fascinating to me, so of course I assumed everyone else should be fascinated as well in the recounting of every minute of labor, describing the intensity of discomfor

posted 10:19:45pm Mar. 03, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.