The New Christians

The New Christians

Same Sex Marriage Blogalogue: Prolegomena 2 – The Limits of Blogging

I’m a real fan of the blogging medium, and I’m actually becoming more so.  But I think it’s only one medium in a panoply of media that help us to engage an issue like same sex marriage.  Blogs are good, and I have great hopes for my blogalogue with Rod, but I also hope that all of our readers will also read long-form essays and articles, books, shorter op-eds, even Tweets.

An example comes from my last post.  Almost immediately after posting it, I received a couple emails from friends asking what exactly I meant in titling it, It’s “Not About Me.”  What I meant is this: One the one hand, I’m not gay, so I necessarily don’t feel the passion about this issue that gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgendered persons do.


On the other hand, I’m not a social scientist.  I won’t be reporting on my blog in some sterile, forensic fashion about research that says our society will be quantitatively better if same sex marriage is legalized.  If that were the case, I could throw my hands in the air and say that the research isn’t my opinion, it’s just what the research says.

But that’s not the case.  Instead, I’m somewhere in the middle.  Rod and I, I’m sure, will both bring research to bear on the blogalogue, and we’ll use data to support our viewpoints.  But, in the end, we’re not scientists, and we’re not gay.  We’re opinionators.  I’m not ashamed of that fact — I’m just trying to call it what it is.


So I tried to communicate that on the last post, and I failed in some sense.


Which exemplifies the shortcomings of the blogging medium.  In fact, the medium is so limited that some of my friends have warned me not to enter into a blog-based dialogue on such a sensitive.  They fear that I’ll be misunderstood and misinterpreted, that a blog cannot communicate the nuance and complexities necessary to this topic, and that the comment section will become a verbally violent place.  And they may be right in all of those concerns.


But every medium has limitations — just look at the “news” that passes for the major network newscasts.  So I endeavor to do two things as I enter into this blogalogue.  First, acknowledge the limits of a blogalogue.  We won’t solve this issue; and it’s unlikely that we’ll write anything that hasn’t been written before.  But maybe we’ll shed light on some things, and hopefully we’ll dialogue in a way that will provoke further dialogue in the comment sections, at coffee shops, over dinner tables, and at church committee meetings.

And second, Rod and I are going to complement our written blog dialogue with an in-person conversation (this Thursday), maybe some video, and even a closing podcast conversation.  The point being, Rod and I will have the benefit of breaking bread together at the beginning of our dialogue.  You probably won’t if you get into a debate with someone in the comment section.  But how about you act like you have broken bread with the other?  That might be a good rule for us all to live by.


Comments read comments(4)
post a comment

posted November 16, 2008 at 9:52 pm


report abuse


posted November 16, 2008 at 9:55 pm

and this as well:

report abuse


posted November 16, 2008 at 10:05 pm

I’m looking forward to your posts, Tony. Thanks.

report abuse

bob c

posted November 17, 2008 at 1:09 pm

dogs & monkey
here is a funny thing to me – preaching & teaching are both profoundly limited constructs, in many ways just as limited as blogging or texting or even phone calls
but when our power is vested in a platform – be it a pulpit or an OpEd page or even a blog – we tend to invest popwer & normalcy into it
what saddens me is not dogs or monkeys or bloggers or pastors – it is the fact that so many people whose lives are directly affected by this dialogue – these people are excluded from the dialogue
from a theological POV, it just seems counter to God taking our flesh and dwelling among us

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

My Blog Has Moved
Dear Readers, After a year with Beliefnet, I've decided to move to my own domain for my blogging.  It's been a fine year -- some things worked, other things didn't.  But in the end, I'll be a better blogger on my own.  My thanks to the ...

posted 12:13:57pm Nov. 13, 2009 | read full post »

The Most Important Cartoon of the Year
By Steve Breen, San Diego Tribune, October 18, 2009 ...

posted 8:51:22am Oct. 25, 2009 | read full post »

Social Media for Pastors
Following up on Christianity21, we at JoPa Productions are developing a series of boot camps for pastors who want to learn about and utilize social media tools like blogging, Twitter, and Facebook.  These are one-day, hands-on learning ...

posted 10:45:52am Oct. 22, 2009 | read full post »

Ending Christian Euphemisms: "Fundamentalist"
I've taken some heat in the comment section for using yesterday's post on "unbiblical" and a "higher view of scripture" as a thin foil for my own disregard of biblical standards. To the contrary, I was pointing to the use of the word unbiblical ...

posted 10:15:41am Oct. 21, 2009 | read full post »

Why You Should Get GENERATE
Last week at Christianity21, GENERATE Magazine debuted. With the tag line, "an artifact of the emergence conversation," it fit perfectly at the gathering. When I actually got around to reading it last weekend, I was truly surprised at how good ...

posted 3:14:37pm Oct. 20, 2009 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.