Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman


Is Sotomayor An Abortion Centrist?

posted by swaldman

One has to assume Obama wouldn’t have appointed Sonia Sotomayor without some indication that she’s pro-choice but — based on very, very little information — I wonder if she might not end up being an abortion centrist.


First, in Center for Reproductive Law and Policy v. Bush, she actually ruled against the pro-choice group on Constitutional grounds.
Second, in Amnesty America v. Town of West Hartford, she ruled in favor of the rights of anti-abortion protestors.
Neither of these cases dealt with the merits of abortion. Nonetheless, it’s interesting that in the two cases we know of that related partly to abortion, she took the position that pro-life groups would have wanted (albeit for reasons unrelated to Roe v. Wade). At a minimum, these cases would seem to indicate that, if she is pro-choice, she didn’t let those views affect her view of the relevant law.
Third, though we certainly can’t generalize, it is the case that Hispanics are the most pro-life members of the Democratic coalition. In Beliefnet’s “12 Tribes” study conducted in the summer of 2008, 58.9% wanted strong restrictions on abortion, while 41.1% took the pro-choice position. She may well be in the 41.1% but at a minimum she grew up in an environment where the pro-life position was well-respected.
I realize this is thin gruel, and new information might turn up any second showing her strong pro-choice position but I’m based on what we know now I’m not sure we can assume she’s hard-line pro-choicer.
UPDATE: Interestingly, Americans United for Life has issued their statement opposing Sotomayor — but it lists no specific pro-choice comments or rulings from the judge. Instead, they focus on her general judicial philosophy: “She believes the role of the Court is to set policy which is exactly the philosophy that led to the Supreme Court turning into the National Abortion Control Board.”
UPDATE #2: The White House briefing also points to her ruling in Lin v Gonzales in which she ruled in favor of a Chinese woman who sought asylum in part because of the force sterilization and abortion policies of the Chinese government.
UPDATE #3: She reportedly was on the baord of a group formerly called the Maternity Center Association, now called Childbirth Connect. They list “20 Rights of Childbearing Women.” None of them relate to the “right to choose.” In fact, I find no mention of abortion on their website.
UPDATE #4: Nancy Keenan, the head of NARAL, the leading pro-choice group, praised her accomplishments but had no sense of whether Sotomayor is pro-choice: “We look forward to learning more about Judge Sotomayor’s views on the right to privacy and the landmark Roe v. Wade decision as the Senate’s hearing process moves forward.”



Advertisement
Comments read comments(45)
post a comment
Michael

posted May 26, 2009 at 11:01 am


I don’t think they show she’s a centrist on abortion; instead, they show she respects the First Amendment and the law.
There’s no real reason to believe that she doesn’t believe in the “rights” language of Roe. Whether she would permit reasonable restrictions, who knows.



report abuse
 

kelly

posted May 26, 2009 at 12:39 pm


Here is the 2 min video with Sotomayor’s comments about policy. It is important that people judge her comments for themselves.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ug-qUvI6WFo&NR=1



report abuse
 

huge

posted May 26, 2009 at 1:06 pm


President Obama will nominate Judge Sonia Sotomayor
If confirmed by the Democratic-controlled Senate, Judge Sotomayor, 54, would replace Justice David H. Souter to become the second woman on the court and only the third female justice in the history of the Supreme Court. She also would be the first Hispanic justice to serve on the Supreme Court.
See details of her biography:Judge Sonia Sotomayor-news-online



report abuse
 

Billy

posted May 26, 2009 at 10:20 pm


People who are pro choice are ignorant to back her. Naral thinks just because she is a minority woman she is goign to be on their side. She has proven otherwise in every case that was a pro chocie vs. pro life case. Roe vs. Wade will be screwed and I don’t want to have to say “I told you so”. So please dont be ignorant people! I don’t have the money to move to Europe yet.



report abuse
 

Anne

posted May 26, 2009 at 11:42 pm


I’m pro-life and prayerfully hopeful.



report abuse
 

Julie

posted May 27, 2009 at 1:13 am


Federal courts of appeal do make policy, which is a well-known fact in the legal arena. The federal courts have stripped the federal employee whistleblower laws to make the laws worthless for the employee. For example, the law states “all” disclosures provide whistleblower status for the employee, but the court created many exceptions. The court said that an acceptable disclosure could not be information gained as part of an employee’s normal job responsibilities. Congress has been trying to change the law to remove the many court rulings for at least two years, but have not yet passed anything. They tried to slip it through in the stimulus bill, but it was removed.
A reason given for making policy is vagueness in the law.



report abuse
 

Max Baxter

posted May 27, 2009 at 10:38 am


Based on what we know how this administration operates, I am almost certain that she was asked point blank where she stood and was told that pro-abortion stand is a condition for the nomination. Rahm would not leave anything to chance. It is always possible that she did say “you can rely on me” and once confirmed votes pro-life. This would have been the biggest political story of the last few decades.
Let’s pray and hope.



report abuse
 

Liz Rosales

posted May 27, 2009 at 1:33 pm


Steve, your such a sissy. Does your mother know your outside playing? This article says NOTHING! What a waste of space. You may as well have written an article about the Sun coming up and going down today. Is your middle name Milquetoast?
I particularly like this bit of gibberish, “I realize this is thin gruel, and new information might turn up any second showing her strong pro-choice position but I’m based on what we know now I’m not sure we can assume she’s hard-line pro-choicer.” What is that supposed to mean?
Go get another crayon and try again, but take a nap first, maybe your just sleepy.



report abuse
 

Steve Sanborn

posted May 27, 2009 at 2:51 pm


Steven….your statements about Hispanics voting 58% for ‘restrictions’ on abortion and 42% voting pro-choice are ignorant at best….people who want restrictions ARE pro-choice….legalized abortion is pre-meditated murder for profit….if you believe this….and it is factual…then you can not be in favor of any abortion for any reason ever…SSS



report abuse
 

MikeWF

posted May 27, 2009 at 2:57 pm


Let’s be real. When has a liberal EVER appointed a Supreme Court Justice who turned out to be conservative? I can think of NO ONE.
Conservatives are the ones who are forced to pick “stealth candidates” like Souter who end up being liberals. I don’t buy for a second that this woman will be anything but a good little liberal, supporting the unfettered right to kill unborn children.
It’s still mind-boggling to me that in this day and age so many of us can’t understand that it is never right to directly and intentionally kill an innocent human being. 3 weeks after conception an unborn child has a heartbeat. At 6 weeks, measurable brain waves. 50 million unique, never to be repeated human beings killed by “choice” since 1973 in this country. It’s barbaric.



report abuse
 

Nancy

posted May 27, 2009 at 3:19 pm


I wonder what her position is on Marriage and the Family.



report abuse
 

Aldebaran

posted May 27, 2009 at 11:25 pm


“He who is not with me is against me”
The mere fact that her position on life issues appears such an enigma makes suspicious. Also she was nominated by someone that manifests homicidal intent. How can I prove this? During the campaign, then candidate Obama said he wasn’t sure when human life began (remember the “above my pay grade” dodge?) Well, if you are not sure, then you err on the side of life. Otherwise, if you are willing to kill what might be human, then you display homicidal intent to kill what IS human.



report abuse
 

DC Garvin

posted May 28, 2009 at 9:23 am


Steve, thanks for your excellent article. As a life long Pro Life Conservative, I have been sickened by the overdone, hyperbolic rhetoric coming from Conservatives surrounding the nomination of Sonia Sotormayor. Its like they got into the habit of slicing and dicing everyone and just can’t stop.
But in this case, Conservatives really ought to quiet down and listen. Sotomayor might very well be much more reasonable than the alternatives. Certainly the facts have yet to turn up a pro abortion mindset out of her past.
And, having listened, seen, read, the context of what she said about a Latino woman, etc., and 2nd Court of Appeals “making policy,” I don’t think the pundits are being honest about her positions. She was simply telling it like it is, whether you agree or not. It amazes me how different things are when you see for yourself, rather than just take what the pundits and politicians say for truth. At least we should give her a chance.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted May 28, 2009 at 12:56 pm


Obama has done nothing but toshow everyone that he is pro-abortion as an Illinois senator ,aUS senator, and now as President.
Further,all his appointments to date have been pro-abortion and largely Catholic.



report abuse
 

Lizzetta

posted June 3, 2009 at 4:21 pm


To me the abortion debate is not about the parents, or women, but it’s about children.
Have any of you who are concerned about killing unborn children thought about the what life is like for of a child whose parent is unable or unwilling to love and care for him or her? Do you assume that any life is worth living?
I’d also like to ask: Have you a) adopted an unwanted child or teenager from foster care? Perhaps that’s not feasible for you, in which case, b) have you called your senator to ask him or her to please raise your taxes so that unwanted children can be supported?
It seems that the idea of Life! Life no matter what! is what matters to those who are upset by legal abortion. I don’t understand how you would wish a life of nearly assured misery and despair onto a child who is born into a home whose parent could never love or care for him or her.
Unless you are someone who concerns yourself in some practical, meaningful way with caring for children with unprepared/ unfit/ unloving parents, I don’t think you have any moral standing in this debate.



report abuse
 

payday loans toronto

posted July 26, 2010 at 9:31 pm


blog.beliefnet.com is great! Thanks to Faless Bad Credit Payday Loans By Ma Alan Friends gone are the days when you used to visit a shop wait in a long queue for transferring a fanow with the emergence of faless bad credit payday loans you can get hold of your loan within a few hours



report abuse
 

Mr. Payday Easy Loans Inc.

posted September 8, 2010 at 4:05 am


Excellent read, I just passed this onto a colleague who was doing a little research on that. And he actually bought me lunch because I found it for him smile So let me rephrase that: Thanks for lunch! oopeeqbbwysjmmkjiqwxppzufkevnxpbfph
Mr. Payday Easy Loans Inc.



report abuse
 

payday loans online

posted September 21, 2010 at 4:20 am


Wow! Thank you! I always wanted to write in my site something like that. Can I take part of your post to my blog?



report abuse
 

payday loans canada

posted September 21, 2010 at 4:05 pm


Thanks for taking the time to discuss this, I feel strongly about it and love learning more on this topic. If possible, as you gain expertise, would you mind updating your blog with more information? It is extremely helpful for me.



report abuse
 

faxless payday loans

posted September 22, 2010 at 3:05 pm


Thanks for such a amazing submit and the overview, I’m completely impressed! Maintain stuff like this coming. qlrwpugsgnf



report abuse
 

faxless payday loans

posted September 25, 2010 at 3:36 pm


Good post. Thank for sharing.



report abuse
 

loans in canada

posted September 26, 2010 at 1:22 am


Well, the post is actually the sweetest on this deserving topic. I agree with your conclusions and will eagerly look forward to your incoming updates. Just saying thanks will not just be adequate, for the wonderful clarity in your writing. I will at once grab your rss feed to stay informed of any updates. Good work and much success in your business endeavors!



report abuse
 

loan canada bad credit

posted September 26, 2010 at 1:55 pm


Very useful article. Myself & my neighbor were preparing to do some research about that. We got a good book on that matter from our local library and most books were not as descriptive as your information. I am very glad to see such information which I was searching for a long time.



report abuse
 

loan in british columbia

posted September 27, 2010 at 2:37 pm


Thanks for making such a killer blog. I arrive on here all the time and am floored with the fresh information here.



report abuse
 

loans ontario

posted September 28, 2010 at 4:27 am


Thanks for making such a killer blog. I come on here all the time and am floored with the fresh information here.



report abuse
 

canada loans for bad credit

posted September 28, 2010 at 3:15 pm


I am doing some thing of the same interest and will be taking note on this .Thanks.



report abuse
 

bc loan canada

posted September 29, 2010 at 3:39 pm


I must say that overall I’m pretty taken with this online site. It is apparent that you know you subject matter and you are passionate about it. I wish I had got your ability to write. I have bookmarked your online site and look forward to more updates.



report abuse
 

lose weight

posted October 1, 2010 at 8:37 pm


I will submit a link to this blog on my website. I’m sure my readers will find this info really remarkable.



report abuse
 

weight loss

posted October 2, 2010 at 3:55 am


Thanks for making such a killer blog. I come on here all the time and am floored with the fresh information here.



report abuse
 

faxless payday loan

posted October 4, 2010 at 2:10 am


Good concepts on this website. It’s rare these days to find websites with data you are seeking. I am happy I chanced on this webpage. I will certainly bookmark it or even register for your rss feeds simply to be updated on your new posts. Keep up the nice job and I’m sure some other folks researching valued information will actually stop by and benefit from your website for resources.



report abuse
 

loans with bad credit

posted October 5, 2010 at 5:57 pm


This website is amazing. I continuously come across something new & different right here. Thank you for that data.



report abuse
 

payday loan online

posted October 12, 2010 at 1:27 pm


I’m happy to have found your particularly really good article! I agree with some of your readers and will eagerly look forward to your coming updates. Just saying thanks will not just be adequate, for the terrific lucidity in your writing. I will instantly grab your rss feed to stay privy of any updates. Good quality work and much success in your business efforts.



report abuse
 

payday loans online

posted December 17, 2010 at 9:02 pm


This website is the top rated web blog. uiyjcosx



report abuse
 

student financial aid

posted December 18, 2010 at 4:03 pm


This website is the most desirable world wide web site. pxmqtiic



report abuse
 

sample resume

posted December 22, 2010 at 1:39 am


This website is the most effective web property. ejuvuljw



report abuse
 

football online

posted December 23, 2010 at 11:49 pm


I am looking for monday night football online broadcast free. How can I find it?



report abuse
 

calendar template

posted January 7, 2011 at 2:26 pm


Thanks for the info about Is Sotomayor An Abortion Centrist?
- Steven Waldman



report abuse
 

digital photo frame

posted January 9, 2011 at 1:31 am


Amazing post about Is Sotomayor An Abortion Centrist?
- Steven Waldman!



report abuse
 

fitness gym

posted January 9, 2011 at 12:43 pm


Unfogettable post about Is Sotomayor An Abortion Centrist?
- Steven Waldman!



report abuse
 

green home

posted January 9, 2011 at 7:25 pm


Unbelievable post about Is Sotomayor An Abortion Centrist?
- Steven Waldman!



report abuse
 

home made pizza

posted January 10, 2011 at 12:37 pm


I appreciate all your hard work and your post about Is Sotomayor An Abortion Centrist?
- Steven Waldman!



report abuse
 

payday loans calgary

posted March 13, 2011 at 12:41 pm


Hello! I’m at work surfing around your blog from my new iphone! Just wanted to say I love reading through your blog and look forward to all your posts! Carry on the fantastic work!



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!
Thank you for visiting this page. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Top Religious News Most Recent Inspiration Post Happy Reading!

posted 6:00:22pm Apr. 20, 2012 | read full post »

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.