Steven Waldman

Steven Waldman


Giving “Permission” for Pro-Life Voters to Vote for Obama

posted by swaldman

Religious progressives have really increased the volume on their argument that a Democratic approach could reduce abortions, even though Democrats are pro-choice. (See Doug Kmiec; Matthew25, and a new coalition called RealAbortionSolutions.org.)
What’s this really about? When i speak to folks in progressive religious world, it’s clear they don’t actually think they’re going to fully convince people that Obama would be better at reducing the number of abortions. After all, this is a rather novel, new argument. Their goal is more limited: to give pro-life voters who are wrestling with an Obama vote “permission” to take the plunge. By raising the idea that there are other ways to reduce abortions besides overturning Roe v. Wade, they make the typical pro-life voter who wants to vote for Obama for other reasons feel less guilty about it.
Evidence that conservatives are worried that this approach might be working: a new email from the Family Research Council entitled, “Abortion Reduction or Pro-life Seduction?” Pointing (accurately) to the fact that Obama supports federal funding for abortion, FRC says , “Americans will get what they pay for-and that is the death of even more innocent, unborn children.”
A more anecdotal piece of evidence: I just ran into a women who said her mother, who is very pro-life and had been very conflicted about Obama, just mailed in her vote for the Democrat after hearing this “abortion reduction” pitch. It gave her “permission,” she said.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
non-metaphysical stephen

posted November 1, 2008 at 10:04 pm


Makes sense — after all, how much is a federal ban on abortion really going to help the situation? It would be nothing more than a whitewash that relieves us of our responsibility to change our culture by finding ways to remove the demand for abortions. With a law in place, we can point our fingers and feel justified when we don’t lift those fingers to help those in need.



report abuse
 

TPQ

posted November 3, 2008 at 11:25 am


The Democrats have always been better at lowering abortion rates and especially teen pregnancy rates. Kids have to know how babies are made (need comprehensive sex education) in order to know how to prevent it. Preventing unwanted pregnancies will prevent abortions. Plus, if abortions become illegal, they will be performed in back alleys with dirty coathangers again, and women’s health will be put in a perilous position. If we really want to protect life, we also have to protect women’s lives, not just the lives of fetuses.
TPQ



report abuse
 

Boz

posted March 5, 2009 at 5:08 pm


This isn’t really all that novel an argument; it’s just a refined version of Bill Clinton’s “safe, legal, and rare” line.



report abuse
 

ziac

posted September 8, 2010 at 2:20 am


Hi there, I found your blog via Google while searching in retribution allowing for regarding gold medal back representing a marrow onslaught and your transmit looks plumb stirring on me



report abuse
 

?ellcept

posted September 9, 2010 at 7:20 pm


Hi, I can’t dividend in value how to associate your surroundings in my rss reader. Can you Better me, deflect
It sounds like you’re creating problems yourself during vexatious to untangle this munificent ask as an surrogate of looking at why
their is a pretty pickle in the unhappy ribbon place.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!
Thank you for visiting this page. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Top Religious News Most Recent Inspiration Post Happy Reading!

posted 6:00:22pm Apr. 20, 2012 | read full post »

Good Bye
Today is my last day at Beliefnet (which I co-founded in 1999). The swirling emotions: sadness, relief, love, humility, pride, anxiety. But mostly deep, deep gratitude. How many people get to come up with an idea and have rich people invest money to make it a reality? How many people get to create

posted 8:37:24am Nov. 20, 2009 | read full post »

"Steven Waldman Named To Lead Commission Effort on Future of Media In a Changing Technological Landscape" (FCC Press Release)
STEVEN WALDMAN NAMED TO LEAD COMMISSION EFFORT ON FUTURE OF MEDIA IN A CHANGING TECHNOLOGICAL LANDSCAPE FCC chairman Julius Genachowski announced today the appointment of Steven Waldman, a highly respected internet entrepreneur and journalist, to lead an agency-wide initiative to assess the state o

posted 11:46:42am Oct. 29, 2009 | read full post »

My Big News
Dear Readers, This is the most difficult (and surreal) post I've had to write. I'm leaving Beliefnet, the company I co-founded in 1999. In mid November, I'll be stepping down as President and Editor in Chief to lead a project on the future of the media for the Federal Communications Commission, the

posted 1:10:11pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »

"Beliefnet Co-Founder and Editor-in-Chief Steps Down to Lead FCC Future of the Media Initiative" (Beliefnet Press Release)
October 28, 2009 BELIEFNET CO-FOUNDER AND EDITOR-IN-CHIEF STEPS DOWN TO LEAD FCC FUTURE OF THE MEDIA INITIATIVE New York, NY - October 28, 2009 - Beliefnet, the leading online community for inspiration and faith, announced today that Steven Waldman, co-founder, president and editor-in-chief, will re

posted 1:05:43pm Oct. 28, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.