Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk

Religion & Public Life With Mark Silk


Same-sex marriage and young evangelicals

posted by Mark Silk

Responding to my wish to separate out the views on same-sex marriage of under-30 “sectarians”
(evangelicals), Sherkat has kindly run the numbers. What they show, as
he points out on his blog,
is that the gap between this cohort and its non-evangelical peers is
actually greater than between sectarians and non-sectarians in older age
cohorts. So much for the myth of young evangelical liberalism on this
issue.

Up to a point. But it’s still the case that the under-30s are somewhat
more liberal on the issue than their evangelical boomer parents–and way
more liberal than over-60 evangelicals. So even though they look at
this point like over-60 non-evangelicals, the evidence is of a
liberalizing generational trend within the evangelical community. What
the data show is most segments of American society moving quickly (the
younger they are) towards acceptance of SSM, with a few–under the
influence of conservative religion–moving more slowly in the same
direction.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
kimball

posted September 27, 2010 at 11:13 am


Mark,
Glad to see that you posted some seemingly objective facts. Although the younger evangelicals have a lot of maturing to do, it is still encouraging to see that most of them have maintained a semblance of traditional Christian morality. With age will come even greater wisdom and Biblical standards.



report abuse
 

Dave C.

posted September 28, 2010 at 12:11 pm


I’m in my 30′s and still have plenty of maturing to look forward to. Thanks for the article.



report abuse
 

Grumpy Old Person

posted October 1, 2010 at 11:59 am


May I make a suggestion that might help move them along at a slightly quicker pace?
Please consider starting to refer to it as either gay marriage or same-gender marriage.
It’s the ‘sex’ part that I believe scares the bejeezus out of the evangelical/fundmentalist (whatever the correct term is these days) wing. It seems that sex is the only thing they associate with God’s gay and lesbian children while, when the world looks at (ahem) opposite sex marriage, they tend only to hear the word ‘marriage’. The world doesn’t – ever – dwell on the sex that str8 married couples enjoy (or don’t) but instead on their relationships.
It would help if the world were to begin lookoing at same-gender couples in the same manner – what is the quality of our relationships? Are they mutually supportive? Are they committed? Are they loving? Not: are they filled with orgies every night? Not: are they having anal intercourse? Oral intercourse?
If we can stop throwing the ‘sex’ part in people’s faces, I think it would lead to greater sympathy if not understanding and mutual respect.
Just a suggestion.
Thanx 4 hearing it out.



report abuse
 

Grumpy Old Person

posted December 26, 2010 at 12:01 pm


Well, that bit of logic sure seems to have stumped the fundies. Making them talk about other human beings instead of just sex machines stops ‘em dead in their tracks, apparently.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Religion and Public Life. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Latest News Story on Beliefnet Happy Reading!  

posted 3:10:11pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

The Ayn Rand Republicans
I confess to feeling a little bit queasy about the American Values Network's new video hoisting Rep. Paul Ryan, Sen. Rand Paul, Rush Limbaugh, and other GOP luminaries on the petard of Ayn Rand and her atheistic philosophy of objectivism. Take a look. [youtube]http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0TxCW

posted 7:13:30pm May. 24, 2011 | read full post »

Whither evangelicals?
I'm fully prepared to believe that Mitch Daniels' family proved to be the unleapable hurdle in his abortive run-up to the GOP presidential race. Imagine yourself as wife Cheri, having split for the coast to marry on old flame, your husband and young daughters left behind in Boone County, Indiana,

posted 9:19:56am May. 23, 2011 | read full post »

No more "social conservatives"
With the presidential election cycle getting up to speed, it's time for reporters and yakkers like me to stop writing about "social conservatives" as if they were an identifiable segment of the voting population. I say this as someone who has happily been using the term since late 2008, when it

posted 8:25:11am May. 20, 2011 | read full post »

So clerical celibacy was not the problem?
Those on the Catholic left are not very happy that the Jay Report declines in no uncertain terms to blame clerical celibacy for the sexual abuse crisis. As the report puts it: Factors that remained consistent over this time period, such as celibacy, do not explain the sexual abuse "crisis." Celib

posted 9:50:34am May. 19, 2011 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.