Progressive Revival

Progressive Revival

Bob McDonnell’s Thesis: Christian Reconstruction and the Virginia Governor’s Race

Although many pundits think the religious right is waning,
Republican Bob McDonnell, whose political views were shaped by radical
right-wing beliefs–those of Christian Reconstruction–appears poised to win
Virginia’s upcoming gubernatorial election.  

McDonnell’s ties to the Christian Right were not an issue
until the late summer when a Washington
reporter obtained a copy of McDonnell’s M.A. thesis in public policy
written for the College of Law at Pat Robertson’s Regent University.  In a series of articles, the Post–and a good number of liberal
bloggers–reported that McDonnell’s thesis attacks working women, birth control,
and public school education.  Critics
pointed out how “conservative” these views are and that McDonnell is associated
with Robertson (McDonnell also served as a Regent trustee until recently)–implying
that such views and associations should discredit his campaign. 


Bob McDonnell responded that he wrote the thesis twenty
years ago, that he doesn’t really remember much about it, and that he can’t
really recall the lectures of his thesis supervisor, Regent’s Law School dean
Herb Titus
(whose views were so controversial that he was eventually removed
from the faculty).  He also claims
to have moderated–pointing to his own family as evidence of his broadmindedness
(he has several successful grown daughters).  Mostly, however, he sidesteps the issue, implying that the
press is out to get him, and that he is a genial jobs-and-economy/law-and-order
sort of guy–not a Christian Right culture warrior.


There is, however, a problem with these claims.  McDonnell’s thesis is not a benign
Christian intellectual piece or slightly biblically goofy.  Rather, it is a detailed argument for
the Republican Party to embrace a specific philosophical worldview called
Christian Reconstruction, an interpretation of the Bible, politics, society,
and the family that has proved so controversial that even some who hold these
ideas will not admit to them in public. 
It is difficult to imagine writing a M.A. thesis based on Reconstructionist
thought and not knowing exactly what you are doing.

Christian Reconstruction is, according to Professor Julie
Ingersoll, a leading expert on the topic, “a label for a small group of
conservative Christians who advocate ‘reconstructing’ society to conform with
biblical law.”  The founder of this
movement is the late R.J. Rushdoony, whose influence on the Christian Right has
often been minimized by some of its leaders (because he advocated such things
as stoning disobedient children) but whom others claim was the single most
important intellectual influence on conservative Christianity in the twentieth century.  


Professor Ingersoll argues that “the ideas of
Reconstructionists helped to frame the worldview of the Christian Right, and helped
weave together the issues that have dominated the Christian Right’s political
agenda while grounding those issues in a specific understanding of the ‘family.'”  Indeed, at the center of Rushdoony’s
thinking–and that of his disciples, such as Herb Titus, Bob McDonnell’s thesis
advisor–stands the idea of the authoritative, patriarchal family.  McDonnell’s thesis?  “The Republican Party’s Vision for the
Family: The Compelling Issue of the Decade.” 


The Post, the
Virginia Democratic Party, and liberal bloggers have looked at the thesis but have
failed to really understand it–partly because they don’t understand
theology.  They see Pat Robertson
(whom they don’t like); they see a lot of anti-feminist language (which they
also don’t like); they see some sort of narrow version of Christianity (that
appears to scare them); and they see conservative politics (and, of course,
they don’t like that).

What they don’t understand is that McDonnell’s work closely
follows that of Ray Sutton, a Rushdoony disciple and the author of Who Owns the Family?  God or the State?   Published in 1986 by Dominion Press, Sutton’s book is an influential
Reconstructionist work–outlining a “statist” attack on the family through
humanistic education, oppressive taxes, sexual perversion, women’s rights,
abortion, welfare, and national healthcare policies–and arguing that the family
needs to be reconstructed to the biblical image of the Old Testament patriarchs
in order to build a theocratic society. 
Indeed, McDonnell’s analysis of the contemporary family follows Sutton
point-by-point (a dependence that is clear in both the body of the thesis and
in the footnotes).  If the analysis
is the same, does McDonnell also want to reconstruct the “biblical” family in
order to create a Christian America? 
He certainly said that he wanted to “restore” a “proper balance of
church, family, and state authority” to the nation (McDonnell, p. 61)–and
called the separation of church and state “conventional folklore” (McDonnell, p.


I am a Christian–and Christians have every right to bring
their moral convictions into the public sphere.  But faith convictions need to be held in tension with the
separation of church and state, laws of equality, and religious diversity. McDonnell’s
thesis does not support separation, is not pro-gender equality, nor is it religiously
inclusive. His thesis outlines a specific theological agenda–that of Christian
Reconstruction, an overt movement to, in the words of Rushdoony, “subdue the
earth and exercise dominion over it . . . Man must bring to all creation God’s
law-order. . . This government is particularly the calling of the man as
husband and father, and of the family as an institution.”


Is this the sort of government Virginians really want?  Do they understand or care about the implications of McDonnell’s own writings?  Whether McDonnell still holds these
convictions–whether or not he will completely denounce and renounce (and not just avoid) them–is
an important matter for both Virginia and the nation. 


quotes about Reconstruction and Rushdoony are from Julie Ingersoll, “Mobilizing
Evangelicals:  Christian
Reconstruction and the Roots of the Christian Right,” in Brint and Schroedel,
eds., Evangelicals and Democracy in
America, Volume II:  Religion and


Comments read comments(6)
post a comment

posted October 21, 2009 at 9:37 am

Don’t confuse what these folks are trying to foist on the public with Christian law. It’s merely their interpretation of the Bible and version of the neo-conservative, capitalist Jesus that they want to be the bsis of the law of the land.

report abuse


posted October 21, 2009 at 10:32 am

We live in a time of great transition, as identified by generation theory. Decisions are being made about what shape institutions will have that shape our future and that we will have to live with. As people of faith, we are called to understand how God is present in the world and how we are to join God in incarnating justice, mercy, kindness, love, generosity, humility, etc. Any time there is an attempt to create chaos and deception is a time we are faced with evil and the “father of lies.” May we discern as a community of faith what we are called to do to be part of the presence of God’s salt of justice and light of love in society and politics.

report abuse

Richard Clark

posted October 21, 2009 at 3:57 pm

“When fascism comes to America it will be wrapped in the flag and carrying a cross.” – Sinclair Lewis (1935)

report abuse

Brian Griffith

posted October 22, 2009 at 12:04 am

The quote I best recall from a Christian Reconstructionist is Gary North’s remark about the stupidity of charity: “subsidizing sluggards is the same as subsidizing evil.”

report abuse

Blue Collar Todd

posted October 22, 2009 at 3:49 am

Strange there is all this fuss bout a candidate for Governor and his thesis, while our sitting President’s thesis is not available to the public. One has to wonder what President Obama may have argued in it if he does not want us to read it?

report abuse


posted October 22, 2009 at 10:50 am

Christian Reconstructionism is certainly a concern, and should be explored thoroughly in this race. What gets me is all those “concerned citizens” who were so excited about Michele Obama’s thesis seem to have little concern about this one, when in fact this thesis is far more threatening to the democratic way of governance we have come to accept as the norm.

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Progressive Revival. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!   ...

posted 2:50:10pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Why Jews Around the World are Praying for the Victory of the Egyptian Uprising
Originally appeared on Tikkun Daily BlogEver since the victory over the dictator of Tunisia and the subsequent uprising in Egypt, my email has been flooded with messages from Jews around the world hoping and praying for the victory of ...

posted 1:48:39pm Feb. 01, 2011 | read full post »

When Generosity, Love, and Kindness are Public Policy, the Violence We Saw in Arizona will Dramatically Diminish
The attempted assassination of Congresswoman Giffords and the murder of so many others in Arizona has elicited a number of policy suggestions, from gun control to private protection for elected officials, to banning incitement to violence on ...

posted 2:44:04pm Jan. 19, 2011 | read full post »

The Spiritual Messages of Chanukah and Christmas -- and Their Downsides
Christmas and Chanukah share a spiritual message: that it is possible to bring light and hope in a world of darkness, oppression and despair. But whereas Christmas focuses on the birth of a single individual whose life and mission was itself ...

posted 12:59:53pm Dec. 02, 2010 | read full post »

Obama (and Biden) Have No Clue About What's Bothering Their Political Base
Shortly before the California Democratic primary in 2008, the San Fransisco Chronicle invited me to write a short article explaining why I, chair of the interfaithNetwork of Spiritual Progressives, was supporting Barack Obama. Like ...

posted 1:44:11pm Sep. 30, 2010 | read full post »


Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.