Pontifications

Pontifications


Obama splits the baby. And denounces cloning.

posted by David Gibson

So in the earlier thread on Obama’s stem cell order today, “Reaganite” took me to task for wondering about the possible paths Obama would choose:

“Please don’t pretend to us that there is any doubt or suspense in your mind on this. David, the readers of your blog are not as dumb as you think.”

Well, maybe the blogger isn’t that dumb either. At least not this time. It turns out Obama punted on the issue of federal financing for research on embryos (NYT story here, WaPo here) and will leave that decision up to Congress. He could not have single-handedly overturned the the Dickey-Wicker amendment, which bars the use of federal funds to conduct research on embryos directly. But he’s also not going to push for that change.

He also said human cloning is “dangerous, profoundly wrong and has no place in our society, or any society.”

Instead, his executive order on stem cells will allow for research on pre-existing embryos with guidelines to be worked out for approval by donors.

Chris Cillizza at the WaPo blogs on the politics and punditry–very good on the issue.

Is it all worth it? Ethical minefield, dodgy prospects for good outcomes, and all that money when children are dying from easily treatable diseases and afflications. I’d prefer Tom Reese’s three-point plan. But Obama split the baby, in a sense, which was not expected. Is this Solomonic? Well, Solomon’s goal, which he achieved, was to have the baby remain whole. Only the mother had to be able to give it up for adoption. The Vatican so far won’t green light embryo pre-adoption, so those embryos will perish in a few years anyway. Seems like no way out.

 



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Brian

posted March 9, 2009 at 8:33 pm

JD

posted March 10, 2009 at 10:57 am


Splits the baby . . . literally.



report abuse
 

Goo

posted March 10, 2009 at 1:14 pm


Let the private sector make the decisions on this. Keep government money out of all stem cell research. We can not afford the political boondoogle of embryonic stem cell research.



report abuse
 

Gabriel Austin

posted March 10, 2009 at 5:13 pm


The question of the frozen embryos is probably best left to God, is it not? The Church clearly says that they are human beings – human beings who have been frozen for possible “uses” by other human beings. But then some ten [or is it twenty? or perhaps thirty] million human beings have been killed in the various dictatorships.
It seems to me that this attitude towards the frozen embryos is not much different from the good old American attitude that the only good Indian is a dead Indian? Which is to say, that killing the frozen embryos, is like killing the embryos in utero, part of an American tradition.
Is “Tom” Reese the Jesuit priest who used to be editor of AMERICA? If so, his ramblings give renewed life to the words “jesuitry” and “jesuitical”.



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Pontifications. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Faith, Media and Culture Prayer, Plain and Simple Happy Blogging!!!  

posted 2:38:01pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Moving on, and many, many thanks...
So...my recent vacation and related absences also coincided with an offer from PoliticsDaily.com to cover religion for them, as editor Melinda Henneberger announces here in her roundup on the site's very successful first 100 days. That means, in short, that I'll have to sign off from blogging h

posted 8:29:24pm Aug. 02, 2009 | read full post »

Calvin at 500, Calvinism 2.0
If you thought you knew John Calvin--who turned 500 last week--you probably don't know enough. For example, that he was French, born Jean Cauvin. And if he was in fact scandalized by dancing, he was also a lot more complex than that. I explored the new look Calvin in an essay at PoliticsDaily, "Patr

posted 11:53:35am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

Apologia pro vita sua...Kinda
 In my defense, I've had computer outages and family reunions and a few days of single-parenthood, which is always a bracing reminder of what many parents go through all the time. And this weekend it's off for a week's vacation. Anyway, hence the long absence. Apologies to those who have chec

posted 10:51:36am Jul. 16, 2009 | read full post »

When Benny met Barry: "I'll pray for you!"
The first word via Vatican Radio and first image (that I saw) via Rocco: Speaking to Vatican Radio, Press Office Director Fr. Federico Lombardi said "moral values in international politics, immigration and the Catholic Church's contribution in developing countries" were key topics of discussio

posted 12:54:28pm Jul. 10, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.