One City

One City


October Quotes: (A Buddhist?) Walt Whitman on a Spiritual America

posted by Ethan Nichtern

october_quotes_spiritual_america.jpgby Ethan Nichtern

An October Quote to start the month.

Question Number One: What does a Spiritual America look like, and is there a difference between “spiritual” and “religious?”

Question Number Two: Was Walt Whitman America’s First Buddhist? Or just a spiritual revolutionary?

“Intense and loving comradeship, the personal
attachment of [hu]man to [hu]man–which, hard to define, underlies the lessons
and ideals of the profound saviors of every land and age, and which seems to
promise, when thoroughly develop’d, cultivated and recognised in manners and
literature, the most substantial hope and safety of the future of these States,
will then be fully express’d.
It is to the development, identification, and
general prevalence of that fervid comradeship…that I look for the counterbalance
and offset of our materialistic and vulgar American democracy, and the
spiritualization thereof.


Many will say it is a dream, and will not follow my
inferences: but I confidently expect a time when there will be seen, running
like a half-hid warp though all the myriad audible and visible worldly
interests of America, threads of [hu]manly friendship, fond and loving, pure
and sweet, strong and life-long, carried to degrees hitherto unknown–not only
giving tone to individual character, and making it unprecedentedly emotional,
muscular, heroic, and refined, but having the deepest relationship to general
politics. I say democracy infers such loving comradeship, as its most
inevitable twin or counterpart, without which it will be incomplete, in vain,
and incapable of perpetuating itself.

-Walt Whitman

Democratic
Vistas, 1871



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Matt Jones

posted October 1, 2009 at 10:25 am


A thought I keep having, as related to this as it is to any other post:
Is not our goal to accept people on their terms, for who they think they are, etc. / and to participate in life (live life) the way we think best suits us?
I think about changing minds a lot. A recent startling conversation I’ve had involved whether or not prospective parents will spank (read: hit) their children. Many responses were “of course, I was spanked and I’m OK” or “yes, putting the muscle memory of something being bad is very important: — coming from friends I shared many commonalities with (non-religious but spiritual with a Buddhist slant, politically liberal, artistic, well read, etc.) and it was utterly shocking. In my response I was reactionary and told them how that I’d assumed we were progressive enough to realize that corporeal punishment wasn’t acceptable, ever, and especially on children. Every time I got this response: that’s how I feel, you aren’t going to change my mind.
And it’s true, I can’t change anyone’s mind but my own. Their minds are theirs for the changing. As my girlfriend later said “are you going to become an anti-spanking crusader?” and I said that I wouldn’t but I would live my life and do my best and maybe that’s enough to help people change their own minds about such things.
Two days after the initial spanking argu-discussion the pro-spanking friend IM’d me and said that he’d come around to thinking that spanking was wrong, was reminded of a situation where his father disciplined his sister with love and kindness in a situation he’d normally have spanked her and the affect it had on their relationship. He said he’d like to think he’d never spank his child and that he could handle a disciplinary situation with (stern) compassion and love.
If I hadn’t made a stink about it would this friend have come to see that hitting children (even when the word used is “spank”) is wrong? I don’t know. It’s a balancing act. It seems that sometimes one needs to put a little more out to get one’s opinions heard and knowing when to do that is important.
Another thought: if everyone was a practicing Buddhist the world would be an entirely different place and I often think of a Spiritual 1984. Does that make sense? The world needs to be the way it is to allow Buddhism to be so beautiful.
Peace and love,
Matt



report abuse
 

Anan E. Maus

posted October 2, 2009 at 10:42 am


Walt Whitman was indeed a spiritual giant.
In addition to his poetry, folks should take some time to read his writings about being a nurse during the Civil War. Some of the most beautiful language I have ever read, anywhere.
Here is a link to praise of Walt Whitman by the Indian saint Sri Chinmoy:
http://www.srichinmoylibrary.com/books/0064/1/8
(In 2007, Sri Chinmoy was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize by Archbishop Desmond Tutu and former Soviet leader Mikhail Gorbachev)
gassho



report abuse
 

Neil Richardson

posted October 30, 2009 at 4:01 pm


I have been researching and teaching a meditation that Whitman practiced and described in one of his unpublished manuscripts. It was probably more similar in nature to mindfulness meditation than to an actual traditional Buddhist practice but he likely developed the practice from reading/talking to Emerson (who did not meditate in any kind of traditional sense). There is also little doubt that an epiphany he experienced when he was 33 years old gave him deep, if temporary insight. Vedanta ideas were also influences in his writing…that described the impermanence of what we can see and feel right now. Even though these sense experiences were “maya” or illusion he urged readers to explore all the varieties of experiences.



report abuse
 

weight loss foods

posted September 6, 2014 at 10:18 am


I do not even know how I ended up here, but I thought this
post was good. I don’t know who you are but certainly you are going to a famous blogger if you are not already ;) Cheers!



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting One City. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Most Recent Buddhist Story By Beliefnet Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!

posted 2:29:05pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

Mixing technology and practice
There were many more good sessions at the Wisdom 2.0 conference this weekend. The intention of the organizers is to post videos. I'll let you know when. Here are some of my notes from a second panel. How do we use modern, social media technologies — such as this blog — to both further o

posted 3:54:40pm May. 02, 2010 | read full post »

Wisdom 2.0
If a zen master were sitting next to the chief technical officer of Twitter, what would they talk about? That sounds like a hypothetical overheared at a bar in San Francisco. But this weekend I saw the very thing at Soren Gordhamer's Wisdom 2.0 conference — named after his book of the same nam

posted 1:43:19pm May. 01, 2010 | read full post »

The Buddha at Work - "All we are is dust in the wind, dude."
"The only true wisdom consists of knowing that you know nothing." - Alex Winter, as Bill S. Preston, Esq. in Bill and Ted's Excellent Adventure"That's us, dude!" - Keanu Reeves, as Ted "Theodore" LoganWhoa! Excellent! I've had impermanence on my mind recently. I've talked about it her

posted 2:20:00pm Jan. 28, 2010 | read full post »

Sometimes You Find Enlightenment by Punching People in the Face
This week I'm curating a guest post from Jonathan Mead, a friend who inspires by living life on his own terms and sharing what he can with others.  To quote from Jonathan's own site, Illuminated Mind: "The reason for everything: To create a revolution based on authentic action. A social movemen

posted 12:32:23pm Jan. 27, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.