Mormon Inquiry

Mormon Inquiry


A lot of Darwin

posted by Dave Banack

LDS Science Review reminds us that 2009 is the sesquicentennial of the first publication of Charles Darwin’s Origin of Species. The site provides links to several videos and articles of interest. I wonder if the BYU biology department will sponsor any events celebrating this anniversary?



Advertisement
Comments read comments(7)
post a comment
Jared*

posted January 8, 2009 at 2:37 pm


I wonder if the BYU biology department will sponsor any events celebrating this anniversary?
Heh. Hopefully it won’t be a hundred years ago all over again.
Thanks for the link.



report abuse
 

S.Faux

posted January 8, 2009 at 3:33 pm


If Mormons stand for truth (and we do), then there is nothing to fear from the scientific study of evolution. There are many LDS scientists out there who study and believe in evolution. It is hard not to, because in biological science it is as obvious as gravity.
Others are welcome to quibble about evolution and disregard it. But, it is a settled issue in science. The only issues of debate are the various mechanisms by which it could have taken place.
I know evolution is not particularly popular in the Church, but the good news is that LDS scientists have studied it for years and even made important contributions, such as Dinosaur Jim Jensen.
Truth has a momentum of its own. I am very confident that the concept of evolution always will have a central place in the life sciences.



report abuse
 

SteveP

posted January 8, 2009 at 9:51 pm


Indeed, BYU Biology has a slough of events coming up in celebration of the “Year of Darwin” I’ll be posting details about the extraordinary year on my Blog soon. It will be a year to remember!



report abuse
 

Jettboy

posted January 9, 2009 at 9:16 am


“Heh. Hopefully it won’t be a hundred years ago all over again.”
Unless you are talking about specific types of incidents, it has been a hundred years ago at BYU for a hundred years. It is only that a truce has been called between the religion department and the biology department. The war still goes on without direct attacks. The religion department continues to use scripture and Conference reports to prove Evolution irreligious and unethical. The Biology department still uses a few unofficial notes from Church officials and occasional scripture to justify religious acceptance.
My own views on the matter are complicated. I am sympathetic to Evolution as I think the scientific evidence is convincing under current interpretive theories available. However, despite the “official” open position of the LDS Church on the subject, I don’t think Evolution is religiously accepted and in fact discouraged.



report abuse
 

Bruce in Montana

posted January 9, 2009 at 2:01 pm


After taking a few semesters of anthropology at UT Knoxville, I was convinced of the truthfulness of evolution and regarded anyone who couldn’t see that as being simple and uneducated.
The problem is that other explanations, such as the fossil record being from a former creation, are not addressed because they don’t lower themselves to the scientific method.
Of course, we’re told about the “wisdom of man” and all it’s ramifications.
My 2 cents…



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted January 10, 2009 at 11:34 pm


The conflict between the Evolution story and the Creation story has to do with the perception that the stories are rivals competing for the same title – “How Man Came to Be”. When we realize that science and religion answer this question for different reasons, and with different methods, then we see that we never really had to choose between them.



report abuse
 

Greg

posted May 8, 2009 at 7:46 pm


I know my comment is late on this subject, but I thought people may be interested in reading an excerpt from Brigham Young on Darwin, Huxley, and Miall. It appears that Brigham Young was right on track when he stated that a “false political economy” based on these ideas would thwart the Saints from living the United Order. Food for thought.



report abuse
 



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Mormon Inquiry. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Most Recent Mormon Story on Beliefnet Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 2:21:45pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

The meanings of Zion
This is the third post on Richard L. Bushman's Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction (OUP, 2008). [See Part 1 and Part 2.] In Chapter Three, Bushman reviews the several meanings of the term "Zion" in LDS doctrine and thinking. The Mormon sense of Zion has no real parallels in Protestant though

posted 11:00:37pm Jul. 29, 2009 | read full post »

A statistical portrait of Mormons
The Pew Forum recently issued a detailed summary of survey information about Mormons gathered as part of a much larger survey of religious life in the United States. It is a very readable summary, noting that Mormons comprise 1.7% of adults in the US; 35% of Mormon adults live in Utah and 13% live i

posted 12:33:08pm Jul. 29, 2009 | read full post »

July 24th: Pioneer Day in Utah
July 24th is a state holiday in Utah, designated Pioneer Day. It commemorates the entry of the first wagon train of Mormons into the Salt Lake Valley in the summer of 1847. They came down Emigration Canyon, somewhat north of the present I-80 corridor which comes down Parley's Canyon. Brigham Young w

posted 5:38:50pm Jul. 23, 2009 | read full post »

Finding heretics in strange places
A very interesting post at Mormon Matters, reviewing a 1989 book titled "Will the Real Heretics Please Stand Up?" The book was written by an attorney who grew up a Jehovah's Witness, then became an Evangelical Christian. That lasted until he conducted a thorough reading the original writings of the

posted 6:27:09pm Jul. 22, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.