Mormon Inquiry

Mormon Inquiry


Managing by the numbers

posted by Dave Banack

A post at Mormanity raises the question of the role of statistics in managing the LDS Church. Statistics are ubiquitous in congregations, stakes, and the Church as a whole. I understand why local and senior LDS leaders rely on statistics, but rarely is the downside of this statistical focus discussed.

On the positive side, tracking statistics is an incentive for good performance and a basis for accountability. If Sunday meetings are worth attending and if individual Latter-day Saints have a commitment to attend whenever possible, then measuring attendance is a useful statistic to help leaders assess the faithfulness of members and their own effectiveness as leaders. Similar arguments could be made for a variety of other statistical categories. So one can argue that taking statistics seriously shows that LDS leaders take their responsibilities seriously.

There are problems, however. How much is too much? In any bureaucratic system, required statistics and reports accumulate and only rarely get purged or streamlined. Worse, the important things (e.g., do visitors feel welcome in the ward? do members of the ward exhibit charity and love unfeigned?) may be difficult or impossible to measure in a statistic, while minor or even irrelevant data (the number of bodies that appear in the adult Sunday School class on any given Sunday) are easily measured and become the focus of reports and discussion. Measuring what we can measure as a substitute for the important stuff we can’t measure is not the best approach. You know the anecdote about the quarter and the streetlight.

Or take the ubiquitous home teaching percentage statistic. I have seen claims made that the home teaching percentage is an inerrant indicator of the spiritual health of a ward or stake. I suspect what it really measures is the commitment of local priesthood holders to do what they’re asked and support their local leaders, whether they think it is accomplishing anything or not. In practice, the home teaching percentage sometimes functions as an indispensable part of the management-by-guilt toolkit: it allows local leaders to rail on the men in priesthood meetings each Sunday, stake leaders to rail on the local leaders, and senior leaders to rail on the stake leaders.

Perhaps the whole statistical approach could use some reevaluation.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(6)
post a comment
Your Name

posted December 15, 2008 at 2:34 pm


Excellent points Dave.
Much of the motive I believe is to gain some improvement in some way. I have always believed that to get someone to change for the better, then help improve their testomony. Another thing impossible to measure.



report abuse
 

Ahlstrom

posted December 15, 2008 at 3:42 pm


Good insights,
As a member of the Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, I can tell you that this is a topic that has been discussed before. Every organization needs statistics for self evaluation and looking at yourself honestly in the mirror. These Stats don’t get put aside and accumulate dust. They are used I can tell you. Some of the stats are published, such as the annual Church Almanac.
On the flip side of good and accurate statistics the church does need to take into consideration things that you can’t put a number on, just as you mentioned. And I can assure you that the church also takes into consideration these aspects as well. We are constantly admonished on remembering who’s work we’re doing and to remember who we are doing them for.
For example, on my mission, my mission president had us bring a picture of someone who we were teaching or who had just joined the church. We hung them all up on a wall, and our president gave an inspiring talk to remember these people and the reason we want them to know the gospel. Behind all the statistics there is a face. And it is for that face that we compile the statistics in the first place.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted December 15, 2008 at 9:13 pm


In any organization, statistics are used to help measure change, hopefully improvement, over time. As the current President of the Church has stated, “Where performance is measured, performance improves. Where performance is measured and reported, the rate of improvement accelerates.” This is how statistics can help a ward, stake or the Church accomplish its mission of bringing people to Christ.
That being said, the use of statistics is just one instrument in a leader’s tool box. If someone were to only use statistics they would be just as poor a leader as someone that never used them.



report abuse
 

Ed Dart

posted December 16, 2008 at 1:04 pm


If 1/2 of your Wards Home Teaching is quality. Then 1/2 of 20% is 10% and 1/2 of 90% is 45%. Quality Home Teaching is the goal, but without Quantity you can’t have Quality. A poor visit is better then no visit.



report abuse
 

Your Name

posted December 16, 2008 at 11:13 pm


Stats are indicators of trends and other true phenomena. All things can be used for good or ill, just like the Scriptures or any other medium of power.
Nice thoughts. Thanks.



report abuse
 

Kim Siever

posted May 29, 2009 at 11:45 am


Home teaching statistics measure whether a home teacher visited a family. Period. It doesn’t measure a family’s spiritual progress, nor does it report whether the home teacher enquired about the family’s spiritual or temporal well being. It also doesn’t measure service done among ward members who do not home teach each other. It is one of the Church’s most useless statistic.



report abuse
 



Previous Posts

More blogs to enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Mormon Inquiry. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Most Recent Mormon Story on Beliefnet Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 2:21:45pm Aug. 27, 2012 | read full post »

The meanings of Zion
This is the third post on Richard L. Bushman's Mormonism: A Very Short Introduction (OUP, 2008). [See Part 1 and Part 2.] In Chapter Three, Bushman reviews the several meanings of the term "Zion" in LDS doctrine and thinking. The Mormon sense of Zion has no real parallels in Protestant though

posted 11:00:37pm Jul. 29, 2009 | read full post »

A statistical portrait of Mormons
The Pew Forum recently issued a detailed summary of survey information about Mormons gathered as part of a much larger survey of religious life in the United States. It is a very readable summary, noting that Mormons comprise 1.7% of adults in the US; 35% of Mormon adults live in Utah and 13% live i

posted 12:33:08pm Jul. 29, 2009 | read full post »

July 24th: Pioneer Day in Utah
July 24th is a state holiday in Utah, designated Pioneer Day. It commemorates the entry of the first wagon train of Mormons into the Salt Lake Valley in the summer of 1847. They came down Emigration Canyon, somewhat north of the present I-80 corridor which comes down Parley's Canyon. Brigham Young w

posted 5:38:50pm Jul. 23, 2009 | read full post »

Finding heretics in strange places
A very interesting post at Mormon Matters, reviewing a 1989 book titled "Will the Real Heretics Please Stand Up?" The book was written by an attorney who grew up a Jehovah's Witness, then became an Evangelical Christian. That lasted until he conducted a thorough reading the original writings of the

posted 6:27:09pm Jul. 22, 2009 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.