Kingdom of Priests

Kingdom of Priests


The Pope in Jerusalem

posted by David Klinghoffer

Would Pope Benedict accept an invitation to edit the next speech given by Israeli former chief rabbi Israel Meir Lau? No, I don’t think he would. It would be beneath his dignity. 

Yet when Benedict comes to Israel and speaks at Yad Vashem in memory of victims of the Holocaust, Rabbi Lau, who is chairman of the Yad Vashem Council, and other Israeli big shots jump into the fray, taking issue with the Pope’s failure to allude directly to the Nazis, his use of the word “killed” instead of “murdered,” that he spoke of “millions” killed rather than 6 million, etc.

Meanwhile the JPost reports that the Knesset’s Speaker, Reuven Rivlin, complained about the speech that “everything that we feared came to fruition.”

“I came to the memorial not only to hear historical descriptions or about the established fact of the Holocaust. I came as a Jew, hoping to hear an apology and a request for forgiveness from those who caused our tragedy, and among them, the Germans and the church. But to my sadness, I did not hear any such thing,” he said.

Given the extent to which Nazi thought and rhetoric drew on Darwinian theory, it would make as much sense — that is, not much — to ask the biology department at your local university to apologize for the Holocaust.
But more to the point, one wishes that Jewish leaders had the dignity to allow the representative of another faith to visit Israel and express his feelings about the Holocaust in his own way, without being sniped at afterward for trivial defects in his remarks.
Are we not bigger, greater than this?


Advertisement
Comments read comments(1)
post a comment
Glen Davidson

posted May 11, 2009 at 8:10 pm


Given the extent to which Nazi thought and rhetoric drew on Darwinian theory, it would make as much sense — that is, not much — to ask the biology department at your local university to apologize for the Holocaust.

Are we not bigger, greater than this?

Doesn’t look like you are.
Like one of your sources, Joachim Fest, notes:

Yet he [Hitler] went on extracting the elements of his world view from pseudoscientific secondary works: tracts on race theory, anti-Semitic pamphlets, treatises on the Teutons, on racial mysticism and eugenics, as well as popular treatments of Darwinism and the philosophy of history. Joachim Fest, Hitler, Harcourt 2002, p. 201

Do “popular treatments of Darwinism” give any reason for one to write “drew on Darwinian theory”? Or does anything else give David the right to say such a thing? At best it’s misdirection.
He’s never provided any evidence that anything gives him the right to make the same one-sided claims. It’s the same old, same old, for IDists, make the same evidence-free claims again and again, complain that you’re not being treated “fairly,” while, of course, never treating their opponents fairly. How could they? How can one be so very wrong, and still be treating others properly?
And so, the theistic attempts to politically manipulate science continue, with moral demands that scientific freedom must give way to pious pronouncements regarding “god-like” designers (not god, understand, just a being with god’s capabilities).
I wonder why David takes time in so many of his blogposts to totally undermine his points by appealing to pseudoscience and to faulty histories. Clearly he isn’t always wrong about things (I haven’t read the Pope’s speech, so have no business judging on that matter), and yet how could anyone credit the supposed “consequent,” when the premise is unsound, even where he makes a good point?
Glen Davidson
http://tinyurl.com/6mb592



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

Another Blog To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Kingdom of Priests. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here is another blog you may also enjoy: Kabballah Counseling Happy Reading!

posted 11:24:22am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Animal Wisdom: The Voice of the Serpent
Our family watched Jaws together the other evening -- which, in case you're wondering, I regard as responsible parenting since our kids are basically too young to be genuinely scared by the film. The whole rest of the next day, two-year-old Saul was chattering about the "shark teeth." "Shark teeth g

posted 3:56:33pm Mar. 16, 2010 | read full post »

Reading Wesley Smith: Why the Darwin Debate Matters
If the intelligent-design side in the evolution debate doesn't receive the support you might expect from people who should be allies, that may be because they haven't grasped why the whole thing matters so urgently. I got an email recently from a journalist whom I'd queried on the subject. "All told

posted 5:07:12pm Mar. 15, 2010 | read full post »

The Mission of the Jews
Don't miss my essay over at First Things on the mission of the Jews to the world. This, I think, the key idea that the Jewish community needs to absorb at this very unusual cultural moment, for the time is so, so right. Non-Jews are waiting for us to fulfill the roll God gave us in the Torah. Please

posted 6:14:16pm Mar. 05, 2010 | read full post »

Darwin at the Mountains of Madness: Evolution & the Occult
Of all the regrettable cultural forces that Darwinism helped unleash, perhaps the most surprising and seemingly unlikely is its role in sparking the creation of modern occultism. Charles Darwin himself could not have been less interested in the topic. But no attempt to assess the scope of his legacy

posted 2:04:11pm Mar. 04, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.