Jesus Creed

Jesus Creed


Gospels that Stop Short of Shalom

posted by xscot mcknight

Recently I’ve been reading and writing about how we present the gospel, and I’ve considered these “five” gospels that are preached: a gospel of Genesis 1, which focuses on our common humanity and our inherent capacities; a gospel of Genesis 3, which focuses on our sinfulness and which can easily run amok; a gospel that focuses on the death of Jesus, which ends up seeing the gospel that forgives our sins so we can go to heaven; a gospel that focuses on the resurrection, which emphasizes liberation and deliverance from oppression and death; and a gospel that focuses on Pentecost, which emphasizes religious experience. Each of these sorts falls short of Shalom, that condition of human existence in which humans, as eikons of God, are in union with God and communion with one another. God’s will for us on earth is the same will he has for us in the heavens.

Any genuine gospel will keep these in balance: when it does, it can lead to Shalom; when it doesn’t, it offers a gospel that stops short of Shalom.

We are in the Chautauqua region of New York for a speaking event. I’m hoping to get back to this blog Sunday night or Monday morning.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(9)
post a comment
Anonymous

posted April 22, 2005 at 8:07 pm


Comment on past post – did you remove a post concerning some of your studies and interactions with D.A.?



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted April 23, 2005 at 3:45 am


Yes, the stuff on foundationalism. Reason? There is no reason to get too much into how to describe DA Carson’s epistemology.



report abuse
 

ConradGempf

posted April 23, 2005 at 10:11 am


Mmmm… will anyone disagree with this? Isn’t the problem that we all have a different idea of what ‘balanced’ means? ‘Cuz it isn’t like a Digital-Weights-And-Balances balance, it’s more like an Analog-Is-The-Bass-Too-Loud-In-This-Mix kind of balance, no?



report abuse
 

Anonymous

posted April 23, 2005 at 10:30 am


What shalom does it lead to? I think this is the problem in ec. It wants shalom too broadly when Christ said He did not come to bring world peace, but instead war. Shalom is meant for those within His community. Shalom with Him and with each other, but the question in all of this is “who is in the community.” That’s what this whole dialogue is often about, no?



report abuse
 

Jeremy Pierce

posted April 23, 2005 at 10:42 am


I’m not sure we want to reduce all forensic elements to shalom, though, do we? Isn’t there some sense in which God is judge, and we deserve death? It’s true that resolving that brings shalom, but I have trouble seeing it as fundamentally shalom.I agree with you that this concept should be the crucial component of how we explain the gospel to this generation. It’s the fundamental element I deal with when I look at Christian responses to the problem of evil. My sense is that students today will understand the relational aspects of the atonement (which really is the etymological origins of the English word anyway) more easily than they will the other elements. I just don’t want to insist that all the other aspects depend on this one.



report abuse
 

The Big Fella

posted April 23, 2005 at 10:20 pm


Running with the prompt from Conrad i am left pondering just what the ‘correct’ balance is, can it be weighed and measured? What does it look like, what does it sound like?Are all points brought back to the ‘Shalom’ of God? Or is there more. Or do all points come from the ‘Sahlom’ of God, can we understand judgement if we don’t understand love, can we understand hell if we have not tasted something of heaven? Not questions for answer, more thoughts of my own stirred up from your post. Thanks, needed that.



report abuse
 

Scot McKnight

posted April 24, 2005 at 3:43 am


“In balance”?Humans are incurably imbalanced. We chase down those ideas that we find most comfortable and chase away those that challenge us.The “full” gospel will begin with humans as Eikons of God, know that because of the Fall became a “cracked” Eikon, but also know that through the Cross, the Resurrection, and Pentecost, that God’s work of restoring Eikons can lead us to the Shalom God intended for us — that Shalom wherein humans are in union with God and communion with one another. Nothing less, nothing else, nothing better.



report abuse
 

baruch

posted April 25, 2005 at 9:03 am


Another way to put it…Ever since the Reformation, we have thought of Salvation as “salvation from eternal punishment”. It was a preocupation with what happens after we die.While that is a part of it, for sure, I believe what we had at the beginning was the emphesis on “salvation from sin”. It’s about the manifestation of that salvation throughout our lives on earth. The sins that we’re being saved from include sin against one another, thus it’s the Gospel of Shalom.



report abuse
 

Justin

posted April 28, 2005 at 4:38 pm


Scot-You’re making the same statment that I think McLaren is making in AGO. I agree with both of you :).



report abuse
 

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Jesus Creed. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here are some other blogs you may also enjoy: Red Letters with Tom Davis Recent prayer post on Prayables Most Recent Inspiration blog post Happy Reading!  

posted 11:15:58am Aug. 16, 2012 | read full post »

Our Common Prayerbook 30 - 3
Psalm 30 thanks God (vv. 1-3, 11-12) and exhorts others to thank God (vv. 4-5). Both emerge from the concrete reality of David's own experience. Here is what that experience looks like:Step one: David was set on high and was flourishing at the hand of God's bounty (v. 7a).Step two: David became too

posted 12:15:30pm Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Theology After Darwin 1 (RJS)
One of the more important and more difficult pieces of the puzzle as we feel our way forward at the interface of science and faith is the theological implications of discoveries in modern science. A comment on my post Evolution in the Key of D: Deity or Deism noted: ...this reminds me of why I get a

posted 6:01:52am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Almost Christian 4
Who does well when it comes to passing on the faith to the youth? Studies show two groups do really well: conservative Protestants and Mormons; two groups that don't do well are mainline Protestants and Roman Catholics. Kenda Dean's new book is called Almost Christian: What the Faith of Ou

posted 12:01:53am Aug. 31, 2010 | read full post »

Let's Get Neanderthal!
The Cave Man Diet, or Paleo Diet, is getting attention. (Nothing is said about Culver's at all.) The big omission, I have to admit, is that those folks were hunters -- using spears or smacking some rabbit upside the conk or grabbing a fish or two with their hands ... but that's what makes this diet

posted 2:05:48pm Aug. 30, 2010 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.