Deepak Chopra and Intent

Deepak Chopra and Intent

How Men Can Be Wise About Women (Part 3)

posted by Admin


One of the things that women often say they want from men is a spiritual relationship. In an age where “empowerment” is the watch word, you hardly ever hear a word that is at least as important: fulfillment. A spiritual relationship can be defined as one that brings the deepest fulfillment. What I hear from women is that they yearn for men to join them in finding that kind of fulfillment, but, sad to say, I don’t often hear the same thing from men. Which means that there is a gender gap to be closed. The wider the gap, the more dissatisfied the two sexes will be with each other. The more the gap is closed, the more the two sexes will be able to trust and love each other.


This isn’t an axe to be ground, either by me or women as a political bloc. Empowerment was a necessary step, as it still is, because in traditional marriages, the wife gave away too much of herself. There was little choice for her in a society where jobs, money, status and opportunity were so skewed to the male side. Now society has reached some degree of self-awareness. That’s a good, evolutionary step. Even if equality hasn’t been achieved, at least a woman now has a right to claim her own life as belonging to her.


Yet I meet many women who feel equal enough — that isn’t their problem. Their problem is feeling unfulfilled. The negative side of this feeling is a sense of anxiety about their existence or vague depression. They don’t know what they want from men, or from relationships in general. The positive side is a yearning for a spiritual relationship. After all, arriving at more freedom and equality isn’t an end unto itself. Freedom is a platform for greater fulfillment, meaning that it allows new desires to reach their goal. What are these new desires?



  • Relating to men emotionally, with trust that your feelings are valued and won’t be judged.
  • Bonding at a deep level, with complete trust that you are accepted.
  • Exploring who you really are and who your partner really is — in other words, discovering your soul.
  • Letting love and intimacy grow without imposing boundaries or letting fear get in the way.
  • Following a higher purpose together.
  • Living in accord with Nature, not despoiling the planet.
  • Raising a generation of children who can be more fulfilled than this generation.


As you can see, this outline of a spiritual relationship amounts to a kind of grand vision, but it isn’t an agenda. The world’s wisdom traditions mostly talk in the singular, about how one soul can reach heaven or enlightenment or Nirvana. Yet human beings have always been social, and the growth of the individual — leaving aside the small fraction of people suited to be monks and recluses — occurs in a family setting. Looking around today, one sees countless families where inner growth is wanted, yet it’s not an easy subject to talk about. Traditional religion is on the wane, and more importantly, the spiritual side of life in modern society has been divorced from “real life,” meaning the material side.


Which means that in order to close the gap between the two sexes and achieve a spiritual relationship, men have to be aware that they have a part to play, and women have to speak up about their deepest desires. The path begins with honesty and willingness. I realize that men tend to be blamed for being too controlling, emotionally distant, afraid of intimacy, and absorbed in work far more than in relationship. Instead of issuing these blanket complaints, we need to begin where we are. Both sexes are under the same external pressures and subject to stereotyping. The only way to get out of that situation is through a process. Processes take time, yet in the end results are reached. The process of growing spiritually happens one person at a time, which is fortunate, because nobody has to pursue a grand design for transformation. All you need is the right partner, and fulfilling that need begins by saying what you want, what you dream about for yourself, and what kind of fulfillment is lacking. If men and women started talking that way to each other, particularly when young before rigid habits have set in, men would become wise about women, and vice versa. What’s more important?

Deepak Chopra on
Follow Deepak on Twitter

Comments read comments(5)
post a comment
Martin Ucik

posted March 30, 2011 at 1:03 am

There are more than enough sensitive new age men out there who are willing and able to meet women in this spiritual way. But these men usually don’t meet the primary fantasy of empowered spiritual women for a tall successful protector and provider.
And research after research proves that it is men who move towards living in accord with Nature, not despoiling the planet, while the majority of women still seek, choose and reward men who don’t, but instead provide them with a safe and luxurious lifestyle.
With the collapsing middle class and more men than women losing their jobs, it becomes harder and harder for women to find tall, successful men who are also spiritual and sensitive.
Women who can let go of their sense of entitlement, assume equal rights AND!! responsibilities, and see men as true opposites and equals on all levels (material, body, mind, heart and soul) have no problem attracting available men.
Unfortunately, it is only slowly becoming acceptable in our society to speak publically about these findings (see for example Geoffrey Miller “The Mating Mind”, David Brooks “The Social Animal”, David Buss “The Evolution of Desire” or my book Integral Relationships”)

report abuse


posted March 30, 2011 at 8:59 am

@Martin: If opinions made the world go ’round, I’m sure it would be spinning like a top. There’s plenty of room for your opinion and those of the writers you quote – who (shocker!) agree with you.

But it’s high time we all gave up the folly of having opinions and then putting them out there as universal truths. That’s not – in my opinion (whew, glad I got that in!) – the way the world works, the way consciousness works, or the way humanity works.

report abuse

Martin Ucik

posted March 30, 2011 at 12:33 pm

Hi Savir: Do you suggest that research based findings are mere opinions?
Do you have any evidence to the contrary?
If you suggest that we should transcend our old ways of choosing mates (which goes against our evolutionary impulses that no longer seem to serve us well), then I agree. But it is not happening yet.
My point is that there is no lack of sensitive, spiritual, evolved men out there for women to choose from (as suggested by Deepak) but that these men usually don’t meet the primary fantasy (height, income, status) of independent modern and postmodern women, and hence they are not attracted to them.
So it would be more truthful to say that tall successful wealthy men that women are attracted to are often not sensitive and spiritual, and sensitive spiritual men are often not successful, wealthy and tall enough.
And men usually become successful and wealthy by exploiting others and nature.
And it is not PC to talk about these findings of study after study.
Of course if you think that all scientific findings are mere opinions then this is mood argument.

report abuse

Carlos Gonzalez

posted March 30, 2011 at 8:58 pm

I already read Part 1 but missed Part 2, I can’t find it. Would you tell me how to reach it? Thanks

report abuse


posted March 31, 2011 at 12:11 pm


Hi again! Yes I am, and also that such opinions are culturally biased, and attempt to paint all people with one broad stroke — which in itself goes against a lot of prevailing science and research. I don’t doubt that your “archetype” (my word, not yours) exists, but I contend that it’s only a single archetype among many.

We have so many folks today talking about “all liberals,” “all conservatives,” “all Muslims,” “all immigrants,” etc. These perspectives all purport to come from Absolute Truth, whereas they are merely opinions reflecting cultural conditionings and personal projections of the psychological shadow side.

I would hope that those of us who resonate with Deepak’s work can hold ourselves to a higher standard, recognizing opinions as valid perspectives and truths but in the relative sense only, not as absolutes.

report abuse

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to and may be used by in accordance with the agreements.

Previous Posts

Memo to Neuroscience: “We Are Not Brain Puppets”
The notion that human beings walk, talk, think, and do things because our brains control us is a fringe idea, easily refuted with a few moment’s thought and rarely taken seriously. But it got a boost from an Op-ed piece in the New York Times last week under the title, “Are We Really Conscious?

posted 2:29:43pm Oct. 20, 2014 | read full post »

A Science of Miracles--No Longer Optional? (Part 2)
For most people, miracles are something left behind in childhood. They require innocent belief, not adult rationality. The camp of vocal skeptics and atheists provide a crossroads, in fact, where one way leads to irrationality, the other to rationality, as if this definitively defines where the trut

posted 1:17:47pm Oct. 13, 2014 | read full post »

A Science of Miracles—No Longer Optional?
In its ambition to explain every aspect of the natural world, modern science has sidestepped very few problems. Some mysteries are so difficult that they defy the scientific method. It’s hard to conceive of experiments that will tell us what happened before time and space emerged, for example. But

posted 10:36:20am Oct. 06, 2014 | read full post »

Can Sam Harris Wake Us Up? (Part 2)
Most of us recognized ourselves in the mirror this morning.  The person looking back at us has a familiar name, a family, a job.  He (or she) carries around a long menu of likes and dislikes, along with a personal history from the moment we emerged from the womb. It would amaze the vast majority o

posted 11:38:22am Sep. 29, 2014 | read full post »

Can Sam Harris Wake Us Up?
It caused a stir when Sam Harris, in a new book titled Waking Up, changed his message from militant atheism to peaceful Buddhism. A positive message is better than a negative one, and since Buddhism is often labeled as “a religion without God,” Harris's move isn't as radical as it looks at first

posted 1:31:53pm Sep. 22, 2014 | read full post »

Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.