Fellowship of Saints and Sinners

Fellowship of Saints and Sinners


The Heresy of Masculine Christianity: A Response to John Piper

John Piper, pastor of Bethlehem Baptist Church in Minneapolis, Minnesota, advocates "masculine Christianity."

The other day my son’s pre-K teacher commended him for continuing with his work when the other kids around him were goofing off.  My son had gone on dutifully coloring away with his crayons when he could have been lured away from the task at hand.  I was proud of my son, with one corrective: that if he were ever to see one of his classmates playing in such a way as to hurt him or another child, he must stop what he is doing and speak up.

Which is why I have decided to put my crayons down, too, and respond to the latest calls by popular evangelical thinker, writer and Baptist minister, John Piper, for a “masculine Christianity.”  Sadly, I fear that Piper’s so-called “biblical” theology is yet one more example of how we evangelicals are just as guilty as liberal Christians were at the turn of the twentieth century, for example, of making God into our own image and twisting Scripture to fit our own agendas, with the result being very damaging implications for our life together as men and women equally called and gifted to serve Christ and Christ’s mission in the world.

“Heresy” is a strong word- in previous ages, Piper could have been burned at the stake- but here I employ the term not to argue that Piper should be barbecued, but rather, to demonstrate how Piper’s proposed “masculine Christianity” actually departs from orthodox Christianity as defined by the creeds of the early church.  Of greatest issue here is Piper’s problematic treatment of the nature of God, which in turn influences how he reads Scripture and the nature of what it means to be “made in the image of God”: “God has revealed himself to us in the Bible pervasively as King, not Queen, and as Father, not Mother,” Piper writes. “The second person of the Trinity is revealed as the eternal Son. The Father and the Son created man and woman in his image, and gave them together the name of the man, Adam (Genesis 5:2).”

Strikingly, Piper’s description of the divine nature completely ignores the unique personhood and participation of the Third Person of the Trinity, the Holy Spirit.  In Piper’s construction of “masculine Christianity,” “She” has gone painfully missing.  She is, in Hebrew, the feminine ruach: She is present from the very beginning, hovering over the waters at creation and infusing the man and the woman with the very breath of God; and it is She who alights first on Jesus’ head in the form of a dove, authorizing and blessing Jesus’ mission, and then on the heads of the first followers of Jesus at Pentecost, empowering and sending them out to participate in God’s mission.  Without the Spirit, God’s mission in and through the church is dead.  No Spirit? No mission.

Whether intentionally or not, Piper implicitly denies the existence and divinity of the Third Person of the Trinity in his construction of a masculine God- a fact which places him in the ranks of the fourth-century “Pneumatomachianists”- how is that for a mouthful?- whose teachings rejecting the divinity of the Holy Spirit were condemned as a departure from orthodoxy at the First Council of Constantinople in 381 and later at the Council of Chalcedon in 451. And it is this heretical view of the nature of God that in turn allows Piper to read Scripture as an affirmation of manhood at the expense of womanhood. Within Piper’s framework, manhood subsumes womanhood and implicitly takes on a kind of salvific role, precisely because Piper chooses to emphasize the necessity of the Father and the Son’s male gender, in turn linking it with what it means to be “made in God’s image.”  If we were really to tease out the implications of this stilted reasoning, though, Jesus’ maleness, rather than his humanity, becomes necessary for salvation (insofar as salvation is the restoration of God’s image, despoiled by sin, in us): what Jesus has not assumed in human form (in this case, the female nature), Jesus cannot actually save after all (a theological statement first established at the Council of Nicea with the affirmation that Jesus was and is both “fully human and fully divine”).

Piper goes on to lift up only those parts of Scripture that would support the notion that God wants Christianity to “have a masculine feel,” leaving us to assume that Scripture makes little room for more feminine ways of describing God or for honoring women’s equal contributions to God’s mission.  And nothing could be further from the case: God is a mother bird who longs to shelter her children under her wings; God is Wisdom personified as a woman; the Samaritan woman at the well becomes arguably the first apostle; and the Syro-Phoenician woman, in her dogged faith, is the only person recorded in Scripture to actually change Jesus’ mind.  Of course there are many more biblical affirmations of God’s feminine nature and women’s important role in God’s mission. These are only a few.

There is also clear historical evidence to show that women in first-century, household churches were serving Christ equally alongside men (as opposed to “coming alongside” men, as Piper would prefer to describe women’s role in ministry); this, in response to Piper’s heavy reliance on passages such as 1 Timothy 2:12 and Ephesians 5:22-33 to support a traditionally patriarchal approach to marriage and church leadership.  I could go on.

In conclusion, Piper’s argument is not most damaging because it is heretical- although by drawing notice to the heresy inherent in Piper’s theology, I do hope to reduce the potential of such biblically dressed chauvinism to only further centuries of harm done in the name of God against women.  (Piper is, afterall, and rightfully so in many ways, a very influential and respected leader in the church; people take what he has to say very seriously.)

Piper’s case is most damaging because of its implications for God’s mission, however.  The Triune God we worship is a God who, in the power of the Holy Spirit, anoints, sends and equips both men and women to witness to and minister God’s love in Jesus Christ in all manner of ways.  This “Three-in-One” God is not an exclusively “masculine” God; nor is this God an exclusively “feminine” God; this God is One whose image we all bear, male, female or transgender, and whose saving love we all have the capacity to receive and share. When we deny the fully free, fully equal, fully invested collaboration of males and females as modeled within the Godhead Itself, we no longer occupy the Good News that God really is restoring the world.  Nor are we able to effectively share that Good News in life-giving ways, either.



  • Pingback: Is God a woman? | Bible Believer's Journal

  • EMC

    “Heresy 101: A Rewriting of the Gospel and Doctrinal Analysis,” by Kristina Robb-Dover.

  • Pingback: What You Are Saying—On Piper’s “Masculine Christianity” and Evangelicals - Fellowship of Saints and Sinners

  • Kristina Robb-Dover

    Hi Jan,
    It’s wonderful to get acquainted virtually! Thank you for your work! I look forward to checking out your post—and please do keep in touch. You are a reverend, girlfriend. :)
    Kristina

  • Tyler Lorge

    YE ARE SO LOST AS OT IS SO VERY VERY CLEAR THAT WOMEN ARE NOT CALLED TO BE PASTORS NOR PRIEST ! WE ARE FAILING OUR CHILDREN BY WOMEN THAT DO THIS! BE A NUN ID YE WANT TO! MY MAMA WAS EVER BIT THE SWEET GENTAL LOVING CHRISTIAN MOTHER THAT COULD MINISTER ALL “FODS ” TEAVHINGS WITHOUT TRYING TO MEDDLE INTO JESUS CHRIST PLANS FOR ONLY MEN TO FULFILL! WHT ARE YE WOMEN SO AGAINST ALMIGHTY “GODS” LAW! NE A REAL MOTHER AN STAY HOME INSTEAD OF ALLOWING YE CHILD TO BE A ORPKEN IN ANOTHERS HOME WHILE YE TRY BEING A MAN ! BE A “LADY ! AN DO NOT WHAT MAN ON EARTH SAID < BUT AS JESUS CHRIST "FOD" ALMIGHTY SAID! LEAVE THE MEN BE MEN FOR THE HEAD OF THINGS ! AMEN & AMEN ! ++++++ <3 ++++++ YOULL COME TO SEE THIS FROM ALMIGHTY "GOD" IN THE END! AN SAY ALL YE PLEASE AN GET THE GEATHERS UP BUT IT WONT FAZE ME AS I GET MY IMFORMATION FROM ALMIGHTY "GOD" AN THE BLESSED BLOOD OF JESUS CHRIST! AMEN & AMEN !!!!!

  • Jan Fourowls

    Hi Kristina,

    Thank you again for writing such a great blog and for being an inspired voice of compassion and inclusiveness for women and men together. My life is a long journey through Christianity, including side forays as a seeker after God because I started early enough (decades ago) not to have a place available for use of my gifts (being female) in the church to which I was born.

    Thoroughly thrilled that in the 21st century things I’ve known always were true are coming into the light to be healed within our faith! The unambiguous words of your post and what it called forth in me prompted an expanded effort on my fledgling blog on this topic — at the blog the “about” section at the top is the personal story: http://reverendjan.wordpress.com

    The “reverend” is about credentialing to perform friends’ weddings, and also my irony about titles, although I’ve done a largely pro bono Christian coaching and inspirational ministry for women during the past decade wherever consulting work has taken me across the country. And I’m definitely new enough to blogging not to be clear about when or how to link so totally get how filtering comments would be challenging in your new system!

    Have a beautiful day in the love of Jesus, my sister in Christ <3

  • krobbdover

    Hi Jan,

    Thank you so much for your very thoughtful commentary here. I remember writing this post thinking something to the effect of “heresy” is a strong word to use here–but I stand by it. And you are right to note that a culture of domination pervades this world in general, both in the church and out. I hope you’ll keep coming back to visit. Incidentally, what’s your story? What do you do, etc? Sorry for the delay in responding, by the way; we have a new system for filtering comments and I only just was introduced to it.

  • Jan Fourowls

    Keep writing! You do wonderful work here. Reasons are always
    multilayered but from lived experience among various Christian modes of
    practice, I’ve noticed that domination within professed Christian practice
    mirrors the prevailing society of global culture generally, and this mirrored
    domination is comfortable for many professing Christians. (A predominant
    cultural circle feeding on itself.)

    Also many pastors rely for their “higher” authority on a literalist
    English translation (or cultural mistranslation) of the Bible. Then their
    congregation (filled with people acclimated to domination culture) need not
    question what’s printed on the page as translated into the English which arose
    as language in cultures of dominance. (More predominant circularity.) For
    example, “authentein” (Greek) as translated in 1 Timothy 2:11-15,
    could be translated as “originator” and therefore a Pauline caution
    against lapsing back toward temple sex-priestess dogma of males’
    origination from females by a corrupted earth mother goddess religion in
    Ephesus where Timothy pastored. Apparently the translators into English
    of the Greek texts didn’t want to go there several hundred years ago, and most
    don’t want to hear about it today. Breaking free from the predominant
    circularity isn’t easy but blogs like yours help to open minds and hearts. Thank you!

    From the mid-1800’s until now it has not been easy for slaveholders or dominant
    persons of any type to give up the thrill and/or profit of controlling another
    human being especially when the Bible in English has condoned the practice.

    Praying for changed hearts by those who believe differently (about domination and
    otherwise) helps me extend the radical love of Jesus. Facing my own
    lapses from Christ’s radical love helps me forgive myself and those in
    Christendom who might castigate me for even daring as a woman to write this.

  • Pingback: The Year in Review - Fellowship of Saints and Sinners

Previous Posts

"AA" Recovery Groups—Spirituality for the Non-Religious, Hope for the Church?
[caption id="attachment_5326" align="alignleft" width="271"] Bill Wilson co-founded Alcoholics Anonymous with Dr. Bob Smith in 1935. Their affectionately called "Big Book" is one of the best-selling books of all time, having sold more than 30 million copies since its publication. (Photo credit: Haze

posted 11:27:26am Sep. 02, 2014 | read full post »

Thoughtful Christians—They're Around, Via Fare Forward
The cover story from the latest (July/August) issue of Christianity Today offers a refreshing antidote to all the gloom and doom that often accom

posted 2:39:15am Aug. 27, 2014 | read full post »

New Job, New Book
You may have noticed that I've not shown up at this intersection during the last week or so.  A new job, and, with the new job, the promise of a new book projec

posted 2:49:05am Aug. 25, 2014 | read full post »

Mental Health Break—The Wittenburg Door
If you're not already familiar with the online humor magazine The Wittenburg Door, now you are: think The Onion marries Reformed Christian theology and they have a wickedly funny child with an aptitude for making you laugh at most things religion-related in this world.  A "thank you" to saint and s

posted 11:41:16am Aug. 16, 2014 | read full post »

What You Are Saying Re: Driscoll
My last post generated some helpful, constructive input from fellow saints and sinners who read it.  Thank you, all. Saint and sinner Bruce writes:  You know I respect you and appreciate your writing, but I think this is a pride issue, not an evangelical issue. The Catholic Church, Lutherans, P

posted 2:49:05pm Aug. 15, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.