Benedictions: The Pope in America

Benedictions: The Pope in America


Catholics as political orphans

posted by David Gibson

Steve Waldman and Deal Hudson are having a debate about why Clinton is winning the Catholic vote and Obama is not–an interesting development given that the two candidates share most social justice views that might appeal to Catholics, as well as being pro-choice and pro-gay rights and such.
Steve argues that “in the Democratic primaries, the Catholic vote has nothing to do with Catholicism,” while Deal argues that Clinton has already branded herself positively in the eyes of Catholic voters, while Obama has not been able to translate “his social justice package into a family issue, as the Clintons have done so successfully”–and may never do so.
I’d have to side with Steve on this one, yet I’d take it a step further: Catholicism doesn’t “matter” to Catholic voters in the general election either. This is not to say that Catholicism doesn’t matter to Catholics. It’s just that it has little connection to politics, a “great divorce” that has been happening for decades, almost since the apex of Catholic solidarity in the 1960 Kennedy campaign. According to surveys (the Pew surveys being the best source), Catholics consistently say that their faith informs their political choices and views to a lesser degree than it does with any other believers. Depending on how the question is posed, the number of Catholics who say religion is important to their political decisions ranges from 12 percent to 26 percent–the latter figure from a 2004 Pew survey. The next lowest figure was for Mainline Protestants, at 32 percent, and then Jews, at 33 percent. Evangelicals and Black Protestants (hence the import of the Obama-Wright story) clocked in at nearly 6 in 10 saying religion informed their political thinking.
Why is this so for Catholics? It’s not necessarily because Catholics have been trending Republican, although they have become the archetypal ‘swing” vote in recent cycles, one that, like the Holy Spirit, will blow where it will, with unpredictable results. The real reason, I think, is that Catholic voters are political orphans because neither party represents Catholic teachings or Catholic culture or Catholic interests to any consistent degree. Despite the claims of some that the bishops promote a single-issue agenda (that’d be abortion, for those who have been asleep at the switch), the hierarchy’s guide on informing Catholic voters (titled “Faithful Citizenship”) is in fact–if you are a partisan looking for support–the worst voter guide ever written. (Or the safest, in terms of IRS statutes.) The Christian Coalition would have it mulched.
Even the bishops note that the guide’s explanation of Catholic political concerns makes it extremely difficult for a voter to know how to choose. Yes, Catholic voters have much more permissive views than the hierarchy of civil unions for gays and abortion rights and the like. But while abortion is a predominant concern for the bishops, the political reality is that most Catholics feel that even the GOP’s “culture of life” sloganeering (a rip-off from John Paul who, were he alive, should consider a plagiarism lawsuit) is empty rhetoric.
So Catholic voters just don’t have a political affiliation that matches up well with their church’s teachings (though partisans on both sides will dispute that) and in the end they go to the dance with the candidate who makes them the sweetest-sounding promises.



Advertisement
Comments read comments(4)
post a comment
Charles Cosimano

posted April 30, 2008 at 12:14 pm


Which is, of course, good news for the country because no one in office should base their positions on the religious beliefs of one constituency.



report abuse
 

David G.

posted April 30, 2008 at 2:33 pm


Charles: If political parties reflect morally and ethically inconsistent–indeed, diametric–positions, is that a good thing for the country?



report abuse
 

RelicMM

posted May 3, 2008 at 12:24 pm


But it does help when those in office base their positions on the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob. That is the God that our nation once trusted.



report abuse
 

Pingback: Counting the Catholics Who Care: a Reply to David Gibson - Casting Stones

Post a Comment

By submitting these comments, I agree to the beliefnet.com terms of service, rules of conduct and privacy policy (the "agreements"). I understand and agree that any content I post is licensed to beliefnet.com and may be used by beliefnet.com in accordance with the agreements.



Previous Posts

More Blogs To Enjoy!!!
Thank you for visiting Benedictions. This blog is no longer being updated. Please enjoy the archives. Here is another blog you may also enjoy: Prayer Plain and Simple Happy Reading!!!

posted 9:41:52am Jul. 06, 2012 | read full post »

Archbishop Chaput weighs in against "Obama Catholics"--and for...?
Denver's Archbishop Charles Chaput combines an intellectual's depth with the doughty persona of a politicker, which is what he used to be--he worked for the RFK campaign and later, even as a priest, was a campaign volunteer for Jimmy Carter. Some say he's still a political operative, though for the

posted 11:18:53am May. 20, 2008 | read full post »

The Hagee-Donohue ticket: "Liberals' worst nightmare"
The elaborate courtship of Texas televangelist John Hagee--who is covering McCain's evangelical flank--and the Catholic League's Bill Donohue, who accused Hagee of anti-Catholicism for his "Great Whore" sermonizing and other standard anti-papist barbs, always seemed to hold about as much suspense as

posted 10:54:05am May. 19, 2008 | read full post »

An olive branch to divorced-and-remarried Catholics?
An item in the current edition of The Tablet of London hints at a possible opening for divorced and remarried Catholics to receive communion--even though many do, obviously, their ban from the altar under church law remains one of the sorest pastoral points in the US church. It is also a sore point

posted 6:00:00am May. 17, 2008 | read full post »

The key to Benedict...
It is summed up in a response recounted by Father Jim Martin, a Jesuit and author who posts (and edits) at America magazine's blog. Father Martin has a post on "Three Unreported Papal Stories" from last month's visit. The third is the payoff: Third: Another priest friend serving as a secretary to on

posted 5:12:35pm May. 16, 2008 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.