At the Intersection of Faith and Culture

At the Intersection of Faith and Culture


Jeb Bush: Disaster for the GOP

posted by Jack Kerwick

So, the word is that the fat cat GOP donors are eyeing up Jeb Bush as a presidential candidate for 2016.

If there’s any truth to this—and, tragically, it appears that there most certainly is—then there is but one conclusion left for any remotely sober person to draw:

The Republican Party is politically suicidal.

It is nothing short of incredible that anyone who isn’t one of its arch foes should even consider, much less desire, a Bush, any Bush, to so much as be associated with the GOP, to say nothing of becoming its standard bearer.  If Republicans knew what was good for them, they would avoid like the plague anyone with a name that merely sounded like Bush.

To be certain, a wish for Jeb Bush to lead the GOP is a death wish.

First, the damage that George W. Bush inflicted upon the Republican brand can’t be overstated.  Barack Obama is terrible for this country, for sure.  As we enter into the sixth year of his seemingly endless tenure in office, it is as easy for Republicans to forget just how unpopular Bush II was when he left office as it is easy for them to ignore the fact that Americans still blame him for involving their country in two unnecessary, protracted wars while sliding it into a recession.

Granted, resentment toward the 43rd president is no longer as intense as it once was.  However, with another Bush looking to take the White House in 2016, it is nothing less than a foregone conclusion that old feelings will return with a vengeance the likes of which haven’t been seen since 2006 and 2008.

Secondly, as the political climate has changed over the last few years, so too has the temperament of the rank and file, the base, of the Republican Party.  To put it simply, for the impulse toward so-called “moderate” candidates for which the GOP has become known, legions of traditional Republican voters in this Age of Obama have unmitigated contempt.

And Jeb Bush typifies the Republican “moderate.”

In 2008, after years of being insulted by John McCain—a Republican, recall, whom the leftist media endlessly praised for being a “maverick” until he dared to run against Obama—some 3 million Republicans decided they simply could not in good conscience vote for him in that year’s presidential election.

Even more telling, four years later, after President Obama had an entire term to reveal his identity to the nation, one million more Republican voters than refrained from voting for McCain refrained from voting for “moderate” Mitt Romney.

If Jeb Bush is the party’s nominee, you can take it to the bank that the GOP will continue to hemorrhage voters in 2016.

In fact, we can go even further: It isn’t in the least implausible to suspect that if Jeb Bush is even in the presidential primaries it will come at a considerable, possibly prohibitive, cost to Republicans.

Not only will scores of GOP voters take this as proof that, for all of their party’s conservative talk at election time, it still, even now, after eight years of Obama, isn’t willing to walk the walk; they will take it as proof as well that they are being manipulated and taken for granted by their own party heads.

Moreover, the left-wing press will have a field day exploiting the news that Republicans want to let loose another Bush on the country.  There is (relatively) little mention of Bush II these days. All of this will change dramatically if Jeb Bush gets even close to securing his party’s nomination.  The media will labor tirelessly to resurrect in the popular imagination the state of the nation under Bush II and his Republican Party.

And if you thought that those in the media were hard on Bush II and the GOP during his tenure, you ain’t seen nothin’ yet.

 



  • Licardo Fantastic Gwira

    I don’t get how the GOP leaders could be so “blind” as to truly believe the people would get behind Jeb Bush. They really are out of touch with reality.

Previous Posts

Political Correctness and Ebola
That there is a sensationalistic dimension to the Ebola coverage is something of which I have no doubt. Sensationalizing events is what the media does best. There may even be a sense in which it can be said that sensationalism is intrinsic to mass media.  Sensationalism serves the interests of t

posted 10:26:30pm Oct. 16, 2014 | read full post »

Capital Punishment Revisited
For a discussion of capital punishment, with no thinker is there a better place to begin than Ernest van den Haag. It is with justice that the latter’s seminal analysis of this topic is a staple of textbooks in college ethics courses nationwide: the author addresses the thicket of issues that are

posted 9:11:40am Oct. 14, 2014 | read full post »

Abortion Reconsidered III
Dan Marquis contends that except in “rare cases,” abortion is immoral, and it is immoral, he further argues, because the fetus has a “FLO”—a “future like ours.” Before arguing that abortion is wrong, Marquis first attempts to show what makes killing in general wrong. Killing is wron

posted 6:30:13pm Oct. 12, 2014 | read full post »

The Left, Columbus, and Why This Day is Still Worth Celebrating
Few holidays are as “politically incorrect” as is the day that Americans reserve to commemorate the birthday of Christopher Columbus. Such is the ferocity of the smear campaign to which Columbus has been subjected for decades that he has been made into a villain among villains in the rogues’ g

posted 6:11:01pm Oct. 12, 2014 | read full post »

Abortion Reconsidered II
John T. Noonan, a Catholic jurist whose work on abortion regularly features in ethics textbooks, contends that the traditional definition of a human being remains rationally superior to its competitors. A human being, Noonan insists, is anyone who has been conceived by human parents. The most com

posted 10:13:20pm Oct. 01, 2014 | read full post »




Report as Inappropriate

You are reporting this content because it violates the Terms of Service.

All reported content is logged for investigation.