Christians and Reincarnation

Could Christian theology adapt to the increasingly common belief in reincarnation? Absolutely, says author Christopher Bache.

BY: Interview by Laura Sheahen

Dr. Christopher Bache is the author of Life Cycles: Reincarnation and the Web of Life and a professor of religion at Youngstown State University. He spoke with Beliefnet about the recent surge in interest in reincarnation and its implications for Christianity.

Do you think a belief in reincarnation is becoming more mainstream among Americans?

I think very much so. The Gallup polls taken in the mid-1970s and mid-80s show that approximately 24% of the American adult population believes in reincarnation. This is a remarkable statistic, given that medical, academic, and scientific institutions generally have not supported that belief.

A fairly recent Gallup poll--I believe in 1999--indicated that over 20% of the people who self-identify as Christians believe in reincarnation. What do you think is going on?

Several things. One thing is that people are slowly becoming aware of the high caliber of evidence that supports reincarnation. Not only Ian Stevenson's extraordinary studies with children, but also therapeutic evidence and the large number of clinical psychologists who are doing past life therapy. That discipline has matured a great deal over the past twenty-five years.

Another thing is that reincarnation opens up a new avenue within which to view the problem of suffering.

You're saying a belief in reincarnation helps us understand the existence of suffering and evil?

What it does is expand exponentially our understanding of how much time we have to refine and perfect the life process. As a teacher, how much knowledge I can expect a student to demonstrate on a test or paper is directly related to how much time I give them to perform it. If it's a one-hour test, I can expect a certain caliber of response. With a two-hour exam, I have higher expectations. If by reincarnation you expand the idea that we have not a hundred years, but millions of years--

To become good people?

I think that's too narrow. By expanding our temporal horizon, it expands the horizon of what the creative project is all about. Clearly there's the problem of suffering and the sense that life somehow can get twisted along the way. If we approach that phenomenon within a reincarnation perspective, we can see that some challenges, wounds or hardships leave such a mark on the soul that they contract or twist the soul in a way that might not be fully resolved within one lifetime. It might take several lifetimes to resolve and work that out.

What's an example of such a soul wound?

Traumas of the heart, of romance. Traumas of war. Traumas of an Auschwitz. They can leave a devastating mark or wound on the soul, one which the person might have to spend an entire next life working out.

Why doesn't the Christian idea work--the idea of living a good life and God being able to heal that soul wound right after death, when the soul reaches heaven?

Because it leaves unanswered the more fundamental question of why God gave you that wound in the first place. The unresolved problem of suffering, even if it can be resolved in a compensatory afterlife, even if justice is persevered, leaves unresolved the question of why God designed the system to open you up to some much suffering in the first place.

Continued on page 2: »

comments powered by Disqus
Related Topics: Faiths