In response to interest in Catholic-Jewish relations-- as exemplified by the popularity of David Kertzer's "The Popes Against the Jews" and James Carroll's "Constantine's Sword," as well as a new Vatican document about the Jewish wait for the messiah -- Beliefnet recently launched a new dialogue between Catholic and Jewish scholars, leaders, and clergy called "The Vatican and the Jews: Understanding the Past, Looking Toward the Future." The dialogue is in the form of an email exchange. Beliefnet will periodically post contributions from the participants.
The dialogue continues with the following question about the Vatican's stance towards both Jews and liberalism:
Fr. John Pawlikowski raised an interesting point about both his and David
Kertzer's belief, as
addressed in "The Popes Against the Jews," that the Vatican's real enemy
during the years before and during
the Holocaust was liberalism. Do you agree that the Vatican didn't speak out against anti-Semitism
because it viewed Jews or Judaism
as too liberal or modern? Was liberalism really the enemy in the eyes of
the Vatican?
Albert Friedlander, dean of the Leo Baeck College, a school in England for the study of Judaism and the training of rabbis and teachers, responds:
As we have mentioned before, the Vatican's war against secularism,
liberalism, and also Communism clearly included the thought that Jews were
favoured by a secular society; and the popular notion of Jews as central to
Communism was very much part of Vatican thinking.
However, I think it is an overreaction to conclude that, for that reason,
the Vatican did not speak out against antisemitism. (Note: I still write
'antisemitism' because I accept James Parkes' view that the word is senseless
when it is broken apart with a hyphen).
Continued on page 2: »
Comments
Add Comment »To comment on this content you must be a registered user:
Sign-Up or Log-In