{"id":12919,"date":"2012-02-29T20:17:26","date_gmt":"2012-03-01T01:17:26","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=12919"},"modified":"2012-02-29T20:17:26","modified_gmt":"2012-03-01T01:17:26","slug":"murdering-new-borns-in-cold-blood-considered-call-it-after-birth-abortions","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2012\/02\/murdering-new-borns-in-cold-blood-considered-call-it-after-birth-abortions.html","title":{"rendered":"Murdering New-Borns in Cold Blood Considered (Call it “After-birth Abortions”)"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n

Excerpt: “If abortion is permissible, infanticide should be permissible,” declare two ethicists.
\n<\/strong><\/span><\/h1>\n

 <\/p>\n

Watchwoman:<\/strong><\/span> To the censers at Beliefnet . . . Don’t worry there are no pictures of slaughtered newborns!\u00a0 No, not even one, we well just look at an innocent picture of a newborn who has been allowed to live.\u00a0 Right after that, please quickly read what God says. Then read the horrifying “logical” argument proposed below by\u00a0two ethicists, \u00a0Alberto Giubilini and\u00a0Francesca Minerva, and then the audacity of the subsequent whining about the people who are horrified by murdering newborns and who stated their objections to the wanton slaughter of innocent babies.\u00a0 Insanity is what man’s godless logic brings about.\u00a0 Calling themselves ethicists is an oxymoron in and of itself.\u00a0 Here’s the bottom line…We either rely completely and utterly on the Holy Written Moral Law Word of God, the Holy King James Bible, to establish right from wrong, or we will end up rejecting all and every form of morality and just let anyone kill anyone they feel like.\u00a0 We are on the worst slippery slope and the godless are throwing soapsuds on top of the black iced over, frozen concrete already tilted on a 30\u00b0 angle. Following the “logical” godless morality of the two ethicists below, why should we be upset because three teenagers were murdered in Chardon High School this past Monday when one day in the future that will be considered just another very, very, very, very late term abortion. As for all you logical godless ethicists out there who doubt what I’m writing, hear this, I was alive and cognizant of the news and discussions in the late 1960’s and early 1970’s when abortion was being bantered about, discussed logically.\u00a0 It started out just like this discussion below and ended in 1973 with Roe v. Wade that allows the legalized murder of the unborn for all ninth months of pregnancy, even for full-term babies!\u00a0 \u25ac Donna Calvin<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"
Can't you see, I'm not a fetus, I'm a baby!<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

[Exodus 20:13]\u00a0 Thou shalt not kill.<\/p>\n

Deuteronomy 5:17]\u00a0 Thou shalt not kill.<\/p>\n

[Matthew 5:21]\u00a0 Thou shalt not kill<\/p>\n

[Romans 13:9]\u00a0 Thou shalt not kill<\/p>\n

HOW MANY TIMES DOES GOD HAVE TO SAY “THOU SHALT NOT KILL” FOR MAN TO BELIEVE IT???<\/strong><\/p>\n

____________________________________________<\/p>\n

Health \u2018Journal of Medical Ethics\u2019 Stands by Publication of \u2018After-Birth Abortions\u2019 Article<\/h1>\n