{"id":12185,"date":"2012-01-28T20:33:22","date_gmt":"2012-01-29T01:33:22","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=12185"},"modified":"2012-01-28T20:41:17","modified_gmt":"2012-01-29T01:41:17","slug":"the-curse-of-saul-alinsky-obama-has-lost-his-mojo","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2012\/01\/the-curse-of-saul-alinsky-obama-has-lost-his-mojo.html","title":{"rendered":"The curse of Saul Alinsky – Obama has lost his mojo"},"content":{"rendered":"
\n
\n

\u201cRules for Radicals\u201d is dedicated to Lucifer<\/strong><\/h1>\n
From: Conservative Activist<\/strong><\/div>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n
\n
\"\"<\/div>\n<\/div>\n

In recent months, pundits from across the political spectrum have reached a consensus: Obama has lost his mojo. Even Chris Matthews forlornly admits that the thrill is gone. There\u2019s distress on the left and confusion on the right concerning our president\u2019s struggle to strike a chord that resonates with anyone. Obama seems to have misplaced his once-superhuman ability to connect, to uplift, to electrify, to rally the people toward a righteous common cause.<\/p>\n

In defense of the president, the criticism is unfair. He never really had that ability.<\/p>\n

Sure, the Barack of yore could occasionally deliver a line (though never extemporaneously). Once upon a campaign, Obama\u2019s words soared off the stage, making knees go weak among his fervent, fainting followers. But campaigns are often personality cults \u2014 especially Barack Obama\u2019s 2008 campaign. One could argue that the fainting episodes said more about the candidate\u2019s uncritical, smitten admirers than it did about the candidate himself. Making grand promises and repeating slogans on the campaign stump hardly makes Obama a great (or even a unique) speaker. A truly great speaker moves minds, changes thought or, to put it in capitalistic terms, sells.<\/p>\n

By the nature of the office, every American president is a salesman. For any ambitious program to be successful, the president must first sell it to the American people. He must unite a majority behind it. This is a hard truth to face for our dear leader. In three years, despite his vast ambitions, Obama has failed to make a sale.<\/p>\n

He can blame Saul\u00a0Alinsky<\/span><\/a>.<\/p>\n

On my first day in my first job as a conservative activist, I was handed a copy of Alinsky\u2019s \u201cRules for Radicals.\u201d<\/strong> It was given in part as a how-to manual for organizing political operations and galvanizing public support, but it was also given to show us what we were up against. Alinsky<\/strong> was a left-wing radical from Chicago who spent his life shaking down businesses and politicians. He is the godfather of community organizing in North America, and he remains a secular saint among progressives, spawning legions of disciples, including Barack Obama.<\/strong><\/p>\n

\"\"\u201cRules for Radicals\u201d is dedicated to Lucifer<\/strong>, who is praised by Alinsky, both for being \u201cthe first radical\u201d and for winning himself a kingdom. In it, Alinsky condemns the state of the modern world, blames capitalism, boasts about his past rabble-rousing successes, then explains in detail several ways to turn citizens against each other to achieve political goals. The substance is mostly amoral, often immoral, advice on how to change public sentiment. It is essentially an instruction guide on how to foment strife, turning neighbor against neighbor until the innately civilized desire to compromise forces a political opponent to acquiesce.<\/p>\n

Reading \u201cRules for Radicals\u201d will depress you. Alinsky took an extremely dim view of his fellow man. He had little use for individuality. He had no compunction in using a political target\u2019s virtue to subvert his or her values. And he actively promoted dishonesty. Understanding that his tactics might be difficult for anyone with a conscience to stomach, Alinsky offered this helpful tidbit: \u201cMoral rationalization is indispensable at all times of action whether to justify the selection or the use of ends or means.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

\n
\n