{"id":10455,"date":"2011-12-13T17:28:59","date_gmt":"2011-12-13T22:28:59","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=10455"},"modified":"2012-01-20T19:42:19","modified_gmt":"2012-01-21T00:42:19","slug":"u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html","title":{"rendered":"U. S. Congress considers bill to censor Internet"},"content":{"rendered":"

Overkill on Internet piracy<\/h1>\n
…………………………………………………………………………<\/span><\/div>\n
By\u00a0Jennifer Rubin<\/a>\u00a0– Washington Post<\/div>\n
……………………………………………………………………………………<\/span><\/div>\n
\n
\"\"
After SOPA\/PIPA, can any one say? www.MaoTseTung www.TiananmenSquare www.ForbiddenCity www.Beijing,China<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

\"\"
Your Blog . . . Free Speech Internet or State-Controlled Internet?<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

Over the weekend, First Amendment impresario\u00a0Floyd Abrams<\/a>\u00a0addressed two controversial Internet piracy bills, the Senate\u2019s Protect IP Act (PIPA) and the House version, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). He argued that the bill, designed to stop Internet theft of intellectual property, has been denounced by critics for setting up \u201c\u2009\u2018walled gardens patrolled by government censors.\u2019 Or derided as imparting \u2018major features\u2019 of \u2018China\u2019s Great Firewall\u2019 to America. And accused of being \u2018potentially politically repressive.\u2019\u2009\u201d He contends, \u201cThis is not serious criticism. The proposition that efforts to enforce the Copyright Act on the Internet amount to some sort of censorship, let alone Chinese-level censorship, is not merely fanciful. It trivializes the pain inflicted by actual censorship that occurs in repressive states throughout the world. Chinese dissidents do not yearn for freedom in order to download pirated movies.\u201d<\/p>\n

I don\u2019t quarrel with his assertion that it is hysterical to regard enforcement of libel and copyright infringement on the Internet as the beginning of a totalitarian state. But he misses the real point of sober-minded critics: The bill is unnecessarily overbroad and a formula for a host of undesirable and unintended consequences.<\/p>\n

ABC News\u00a0<\/a>reported last month on the overbroad nature of the remedies that would be available:<\/p>\n

Eric Schmidt, executive chairman of Google, said the bills would overdo it \u2014 giving copyright holders and government the power to cut off Web sites unreasonably. They could be shut down, and search engines such as Google, Bing and Yahoo could be stopped from linking to them.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u201cThe solutions are draconian,\u201d Schmidt said Tuesday at the MIT Sloan School of Management. \u201cThere\u2019s a bill that would require ISPs [Internet service providers] to remove URLs from the Web, which is also known as censorship last time I checked.\u201d<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\"\"
Bill of Rights Protects Free Speech - SOPA\/PIPA Forbids Free Speech<\/figcaption><\/figure>\n

<\/a>Harvard law professor and Supreme Court advocate Laurence Tribe (whom I don\u2019t always agree with but who takes the Bill of Rights quite seriously and was instrumental in developing the jurisprudence that confirmed the Second Amendment is an individual right) has submitted a\u00a0memo detailing the multiple ways in which SOPA runs afoul of the First Amendment<\/a><\/a>. For example, \u201cSOPA provides that a complaining party can file a notice alleging that it is harmed by the activities occurring on the site \u2018or portion thereof .\u2019 Conceivably, an entire website containing tens of thousands of pages could be targeted if only a single page were accused of infringement. Such an approach would create severe practical problems for sites with substantial user-generated content, such as Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube, and for blogs that allow users to post videos, photos, and other materials.\u201dAnd likewise: \u201cThe notice-and-termination procedure of Section 103(a) runs afoul of the \u2018prior restraint\u2019 doctrine, because it delegates to a private party the power to suppress speech without prior notice and a judicial hearing. This provision of the bill would give complaining parties the power to stop online advertisers and credit card processors from doing business with a website,merely by filing a unilateral notice accusing the site of being \u2018dedicated to theft of U.S. property\u2019 \u2014 even if no court has actually found any infringement. The immunity provisions in the bill create an overwhelming incentive for advertisers and payment processors to comply with such a request immediately upon receipt.\u201d<\/p>\n

\"\"Rep. Darrell Issa (R-Calif.) and Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) have introduced a competing bill, the Online Protection and Enforcement of Digital Trade Act (the \u201cOpen Act<\/a>\u201d), which seeks to address legitimate concerns about SOPA\/PIPA and focus more specifically on the real problem without knocking down robust, protected speech in an indiscriminate fashion. Google, AOL, eBay, Facebook, LinkedIn, Twitter, Mozilla, Yahoo!, and Zynga have signed on to support this alternative to SOPA\/PIPA.<\/p>\n

\"\"The Hill\u00a0<\/a>recently reported on OPEN: \u201cThe draft proposal would instead authorize the International Trade Commission to investigate and issue cease-and-desist orders against foreign websites that provide pirated content or sell counterfeit goods. The ITC would have to find that the site is \u2018primarily\u2019 and \u2018willfully\u2019 engaged in copyright infringement to issue the order.\u201d Rather than take down entire websites and potentially interfere with perfectly legitimate and protected speech OPEN, would, after a court order, \u201ccompel payment providers and online advertising services to cease providing services to the offending website. The approach comports with current copyright law and hews to the \u2018follow the money\u2019 approach favored by Google and other tech companies.\u201d<\/p>\n

In short, this is not a fight between protectors of copyrights and Internet anarchists. Rather, there is a legitimate policy dispute about how broad and how disruptive government enforcement powers should be when core First Amendment rights are at issue. No doubt the Motion Picture Association of America, headed by disgraced former Connecticut senator Chris Dodd, has\u00a0spread plenty of money around Congress\u00a0<\/a>to try to give the government the bluntest, heaviest weapon to fight piracy. But that doesn\u2019t make it good policy. And it sure doesn\u2019t make for constitutional legislation.<\/p>\n

Read More:\u00a0http:\/\/www.washingtonpost.com\/blogs\/right-turn\/post\/overkill-on-internet-piracy\/2011\/12\/11\/gIQA9TK6nO_blog.html<\/a><\/p>\n

Related Items<\/span>:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Watchwoman on the Wall<\/span> – WIKIPEDIA COULD SOON GO DARK IN PROTEST OF HOUSE INTERNET BILL\u00a0<\/strong>
\nhttp:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=10489<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

#1 –\u00a0‘Free speech kill switch’…<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong>Internet piracy bill: A free speech ‘kill switch’<\/span><\/p>\n

By Bill Wilson, Americans for Limited Government<\/div>\n
\n

\"\"What began as an attempt to restrain foreign piracy on the Internet has morphed into a domestic \u201ckill switch\u201d on First Amendment freedom in the fastest-growing corner of the marketplace of ideas.<\/p>\n

Proposed federal legislation purporting to protect online intellectual property would also impose sweeping new government mandates on internet service providers \u2013 a positively Orwellian power grab that would permit the U.S. Justice Department to shut down any internet site it doesn\u2019t like (and cut off its sources of income) on nothing more than a whim.<\/p>\n

Under the so-called \u201cStop Online Piracy Act\u201d (SOPA) the federal government \u2013 which is prohibited constitutionally from abridging free speech or depriving its citizens of their property without due process \u2013 would engage in both practices on an unprecedented scale. And in establishing the precursor to a taxpayer-funded \u201cthought police,\u201d it would dramatically curtail technology investment and innovation \u2013 wreaking havoc on our economy.<\/p>\n

Con’t at:\u00a0http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/congress-blog\/technology\/198687-internet-piracy-bill-a-free-speech-kill-switch<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n

#2 –\u00a0Would ‘criminalize’ Internet…<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/em><\/strong><\/p>\n

Google chairman says online piracy bill would ‘criminalize’ the Internet<\/h1>\n
By Gautham Nagesh<\/div>\n
\n

\"\"\"\"An online piracy bill in the House would “criminalize linking and the fundamental structure of the Internet itself,” according to Google Executive Chairman Eric Schmidt.<\/p>\n

Schmidt said the controversial\u00a0Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA)\u00a0would punish Web firms, including search engines, that link to foreign websites dedicated to online piracy. He said implementing the bill as written would effectively break the Internet.<\/p>\n<\/div>\n

“By criminalizing links, what these bills do is they force you to take content off the Internet,” Schmidt said, calling it a form of censorship.<\/div>\n
Con’t at: \u00a0http:\/\/thehill.com\/blogs\/hillicon-valley\/technology\/198777-google-chairman-says-online-piracy-bill-would-criminalize-linking<\/a><\/strong><\/div>\n

 <\/p>\n

#3 –\u00a0‘China is model’…<\/a>\u00a0\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

<\/strong>MPAA Head Chris Dodd on Online Censorship Bill: China’s the Model<\/span><\/p>\n

\n

BY\u00a0<\/span>DANIEL HALPER<\/a><\/h2>\n<\/div>\n
\n
Jen Rubin\u00a0makes the case today<\/a>\u00a0that the anti-piracy bills pending in the House, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA), and Senate, the Protect Intellectual Property Act (PIPA), are likely unconstitutional.\u00a0The bills essentially call for censorship of online speech in such a way, and with so little recourse for those accused of “infringing” on intellectual property rights, that the bills will likely not survive the scrutiny of the courts even if they do survive in Congress. But if Congress does pass these laws, it will be a testament to the enormous power and influence of two Democratic special interest groups\u2014the Hollywood lobby, comprised of the Motion Picture Association of America and the Recording Industry Association of America, and the trial lawyers.<\/div>\n<\/div>\n
\n

\"\"If you’re wondering why lawyers and Hollywood folks would get behind legislation to censor the Internet, you only need to listen to former Senator Chris Dodd, now the head of the MPAA, who last week explained to Variety that the lobby is only asking for\u00a0the same kind of power to censor the Internet<\/a>\u00a0as the government has in the People’s Republic of China:<\/p>\n

“When the Chinese told Google that they had to block sites or they couldn’t do [business] in their country, they managed to figure out how to block sites.”<\/strong><\/p><\/blockquote>\n<\/div>\n

\n

Indeed, that is precisely the kind of abuse of power we are already seeing from the collaboration between Hollywood and the government on this issue. Last week a tech website\u00a0reported<\/a>\u00a0on a website seizure by the Immigration and Customs Enforcement at the behest of the Recording Industry:<\/p>\n

Con’t at:\u00a0http:\/\/www.weeklystandard.com\/blogs\/mpaa-head-chris-dodd-online-censorship-bill-chinas-model_611984.html<\/a>\u00a0 \u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

____________________________________________________Watchwoman<\/strong><\/span> Related Posts:<\/strong><\/p>\n

Hands Off the Internet Goes Viral<\/strong>
\nhttp:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=11764<\/a><\/p>\n

Wikipedia & Mozilla among others are dark today to oppose SOPA and PIPA<\/strong>
\nhttp:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=11738<\/a><\/p>\n

WIKIPEDIA COULD SOON GO DARK IN PROTEST OF HOUSE INTERNET BILL<\/strong>
\nhttp:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=10489<\/a><\/p>\n

U. S. Congress considers bill to censor Internet<\/strong>
\nhttp:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=10455<\/a><\/p>\n

SOPA\/PIPA is already here!<\/strong>
\nhttp:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/watchwomanonthewall\/?p=11849<\/a><\/p>\n

____________________________________________________<\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n

 <\/p>\n<\/div>\n<\/div>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Overkill on Internet piracy ………………………………………………………………………… By\u00a0Jennifer Rubin\u00a0– Washington Post ……………………………………………………………………………………     Over the weekend, First Amendment impresario\u00a0Floyd Abrams\u00a0addressed two controversial Internet piracy bills, the Senate\u2019s Protect IP Act (PIPA) and the House version, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). He argued that the bill, designed to stop Internet theft of intellectual property, has been…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":403,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1686,7,3100,599,249,344,435,2574,1871,1867,3382,1245,503,1680,757,1430,68,450,2860,6,3121,429,2418,14,2838,806],"tags":[3770,3763,3769,3764,3756,2335,3757,3767,913,3759,3771,3758,365,431,3750,3755,3761,3760,3772,3773,3765,3754,3766,9372,3753,3751,3752,3768,122,3762,3776,3774,3309,3775],"class_list":["post-10455","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-1st-amendment-rights","category-america","category-big-brother-is-here","category-big-government","category-blog","category-bullying","category-communism","category-conspiracy-theory","category-constitutional-unconstitutional","category-evil-plot","category-evil-vs-good","category-fairness-doctrine","category-free-speech","category-injustice","category-new-world-order-globalism","category-news-2","category-political-correctness","category-politics","category-prejudice","category-press-bias","category-radical-change-towards-tyranny-dictatorship","category-society","category-technology","category-u-s-congress","category-wake-up-america","category-warning","tag-aol","tag-bill-of-rights","tag-bing","tag-blogs","tag-censor","tag-censorship","tag-chinas-great-firewall","tag-chinese-level-censorship","tag-communist-china","tag-draconian","tag-ebay","tag-enforce-copyright-act","tag-facebook","tag-google","tag-house-version-stop-online-piracy-act-sopa","tag-internet-censorship","tag-internet-service-providers","tag-isp","tag-linkedin","tag-mozilla","tag-peoples-republic-of-china","tag-pipa","tag-politically-repressive","tag-red-china","tag-senates-protect-ip-act-pipa-protect-ip-act","tag-sopa","tag-stop-online-piracy-act","tag-totalitarian-state","tag-twitter","tag-urls","tag-wikipedia","tag-yahoo","tag-youtube","tag-zynga"],"yoast_head":"\nU. S. Congress considers bill to censor Internet - Watchwoman on the Wall<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"U. S. Congress considers bill to censor Internet - Watchwoman on the Wall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Overkill on Internet piracy ………………………………………………………………………… By\u00a0Jennifer Rubin\u00a0– Washington Post ……………………………………………………………………………………     Over the weekend, First Amendment impresario\u00a0Floyd Abrams\u00a0addressed two controversial Internet piracy bills, the Senate\u2019s Protect IP Act (PIPA) and the House version, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). He argued that the bill, designed to stop Internet theft of intellectual property, has been…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Watchwoman on the Wall\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2011-12-13T22:28:59+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2012-01-21T00:42:19+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"http:\/\/photos3.fotosearch.com\/bthumb\/BCP\/BCP006\/BCP722-37.jpg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Donna Calvin\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"U. S. Congress considers bill to censor Internet - Watchwoman on the Wall","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"U. S. Congress considers bill to censor Internet - Watchwoman on the Wall","og_description":"Overkill on Internet piracy ………………………………………………………………………… By\u00a0Jennifer Rubin\u00a0– Washington Post ……………………………………………………………………………………     Over the weekend, First Amendment impresario\u00a0Floyd Abrams\u00a0addressed two controversial Internet piracy bills, the Senate\u2019s Protect IP Act (PIPA) and the House version, the Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA). He argued that the bill, designed to stop Internet theft of intellectual property, has been…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html","og_site_name":"Watchwoman on the Wall","article_published_time":"2011-12-13T22:28:59+00:00","article_modified_time":"2012-01-21T00:42:19+00:00","og_image":[{"url":"http:\/\/photos3.fotosearch.com\/bthumb\/BCP\/BCP006\/BCP722-37.jpg"}],"author":"Donna Calvin","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html","name":"U. S. Congress considers bill to censor Internet - Watchwoman on the Wall","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"http:\/\/photos3.fotosearch.com\/bthumb\/BCP\/BCP006\/BCP722-37.jpg","datePublished":"2011-12-13T22:28:59+00:00","dateModified":"2012-01-21T00:42:19+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/#\/schema\/person\/1470e1ef6765f8a27f970307b0835df1"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html#primaryimage","url":"http:\/\/photos3.fotosearch.com\/bthumb\/BCP\/BCP006\/BCP722-37.jpg","contentUrl":"http:\/\/photos3.fotosearch.com\/bthumb\/BCP\/BCP006\/BCP722-37.jpg"},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/2011\/12\/u-s-congress-considers-bill-to-censor-internet.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"U. S. Congress considers bill to censor Internet"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/","name":"Watchwoman on the Wall","description":"Beliefnet Voices - Donna Calvin","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/#\/schema\/person\/1470e1ef6765f8a27f970307b0835df1","name":"Donna Calvin","description":"In sixth grade my teacher told us that we were going to be the first generation to see the year 2000 and all things would be different. He continued that God wasn't important, wasn't real, and our parents just used God to impose restrictions on us because they were inadequate to parent effectively. I knew then I was going to be involved in a war and that I would have to be in Jesus Christ's Army. Even then, I knew the United States of America would cease to exist without the vast majority of its citizens voluntarily submitting to the Perfect and Good Laws of the Holy Bible. I am a woman who loves the Lord Jesus Christ. I am tired of seeing our LORD denigrated from the school house to the White House. I search the Internet for items that ought to serve as a warning to Americans and Christians all through America, but the nation seems to be sleeping. Wake up America! You are losing your freedoms, your children and your country. Wake up and help stop it!","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/author\/dcalvin"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/403"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=10455"}],"version-history":[{"count":36,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":10492,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/10455\/revisions\/10492"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=10455"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=10455"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/watchwomanonthewall\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=10455"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}