{"id":951,"date":"2008-12-15T11:23:04","date_gmt":"2008-12-15T11:23:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html"},"modified":"2008-12-15T11:23:04","modified_gmt":"2008-12-15T11:23:04","slug":"keeping-up-with-benedict","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html","title":{"rendered":"Keeping up with Benedict"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Recent words from the Holy Father:<br \/>\n<a href=\"http:\/\/chiesa.espresso.repubblica.it\/articolo\/212913?eng=y\" target=\"_blank\">Sandro Magister examines how frequently Benedict has referred to Original Sin of late:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>He did the same thing at the audience on the following Wednesday, December 10.  He had a written text in his hand, but he spoke almost entirely off the cuff.  Early in the address he returned to the topic of original sin:<br \/>\n&#8220;Dear  brothers and sisters, in following St. Paul we saw two things in the catechesis  last Wednesday. The first is that our human history has been tainted from the  beginning by the abuse of created freedom, which intends to emancipate itself  from the divine will. And in this way it does not find true freedom, but opposes  itself to the truth, and as a result falsifies our human realities. Above all,  it falsifies the fundamental relationships: with God, between man and woman,  between man and the earth. We said that this tainting of our history is spread  through the entire fabric, and that this inherited defect has increased, and is  now visible everywhere. This was the first thing. The second is this: we learned  from St. Paul that there is a new beginning in history and of history in Jesus  Christ, He who is man and God. With Jesus, who comes from God, there begins a  new history formed by his yes to the Father, and thus founded not on the pride  of a false emancipation, but on love and truth.<br \/>\n&#8220;But now the question  arises: how can we enter into this new beginning, into this new history? How  does this new history reach me? With the first tainted history, we are  inevitably connected by our biological origin, we all belong to the one body of  humanity. But communion with Jesus, the new birth in order to enter to become  part of the new humanity, how does this take place? How does Jesus come into my  life, into my being? The fundamental answer of St. Paul, and of the entire New  Testament, is: he comes through the work of the Holy Spirit. If the first  history gets underway, so to speak, with biology, the second gets underway in  the Holy Spirit, the Spirit of the risen Christ. This Spirit created, at  Pentecost, the beginning of the new humanity, of the new community, the Church,  the Body of Christ.&#8221;<br \/>\n* * *<br \/>\nThese improvisations are an important element for  understanding the thought of Benedict XVI. They highlight the things that are  closest to his heart, the ones that he wants to impress most deeply in the minds  of his listeners.<br \/>\nOriginal sin, this dogma that is so overlooked today,  is one of these truths that Pope Ratzinger feels the need to revitalize.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n<p><a href=\"http:\/\/www.vatican.va\/holy_father\/benedict_xvi\/messages\/peace\/documents\/hf_ben-xvi_mes_20081208_xlii-world-day-peace_en.html\" target=\"_blank\">The message for the World Day of Peace, 2009:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote>\n<p align=\"left\">. In this context, fighting poverty requires <em>attentive consideration of the  complex phenomenon of globalization<\/em>. This is important from a methodological  standpoint, because it suggests drawing upon the fruits of economic and  sociological research into the many different aspects of poverty. Yet the  reference to globalization should also alert us to the spiritual and moral  implications of the question, urging us, in our dealings with the poor, to set  out from the clear recognition that we all share in a single divine plan: we are  called to form one family in which all \u2013 individuals, peoples and nations \u2013  model their behaviour according to the principles of fraternity and  responsibility.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">This perspective requires an understanding of poverty that is  wide-ranging and well articulated. If it were a question of material poverty  alone, then the social sciences, which enable us to measure phenomena on the  basis of mainly quantitative data, would be sufficient to illustrate its  principal characteristics. Yet we know that other, non-material forms of poverty  exist which are not the direct and automatic consequence of material  deprivation. For example, in advanced wealthy societies, there is evidence of<em> marginalization,<\/em> as well as<em> affective, moral and spiritual poverty<\/em>,  seen in people whose interior lives are disoriented and who experience various  forms of malaise despite their economic prosperity. On the one hand, I have in  mind what is known as \u201cmoral underdevelopment\u201d<a name=\"_ftnref2\" href=\"#_ftn2\">[2]<\/a>, and on the other hand the negative consequences of  \u201csuperdevelopment\u201d<a name=\"_ftnref3\" href=\"#_ftn3\">[3]<\/a>. Nor can I  forget that, in so-called \u201cpoor\u201d societies, economic growth is often hampered  by<em> cultural impediments<\/em> which lead to inefficient use of available  resources. It remains true, however, that every form of externally imposed  poverty has at its root a lack of respect for the transcendent dignity of the  human person. When man is not considered within the total context of his  vocation, and when the demands of a true \u201chuman ecology\u201d <a name=\"_ftnref4\" href=\"#_ftn4\">[4]<\/a> are not respected, the cruel forces of  poverty are unleashed, as is evident in certain specific areas that I shall now  consider briefly one by one.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<p align=\"left\"><a href=\"http:\/\/www.zenit.org\/article-24553?l=english\" target=\"_blank\">Last week&#8217;s GA, on Paul and Sacraments:<\/a><\/p>\n<blockquote><p>In this catechesis, of course, I cannot go into a detailed interpretation of  this difficult text. I would like to point out briefly only three things. The  first: &#8220;We have been baptized&#8221; is passive. No one can baptize himself, he needs  the other. No one can become a Christian by himself. To be Christian is a  passive process. We can only become Christians through another. And this &#8220;other&#8221;  that makes us Christians, that gives us the gift of faith, is in the first  instance the community of believers, the Church. We receive the faith, the  baptism of the Church. If we do not let ourselves be formed by this community we  cannot be Christians. An autonomous Christianity, self-produced, is a  contradiction in itself. In the first instance, this &#8220;other&#8221; is the community of  believers, the Church, but in the second instance, neither does this community  act by itself, according to its own ideas or desires. The community also lives  in the same passive sense: Only Christ can constitute the Church. Christ is the  real giver of the sacraments. This is the first point: No one baptizes himself,  no one makes himself a Christian. We become Christians.<br \/>\nThe second is this: Baptism is more than a cleansing. It is death and  resurrection. Paul himself, speaking in the Letter to the Galatians of the  change in his life through the encounter with the Risen Christ, describes it  thus: I have died. He really begins, at this moment, a new life. To be a  Christian is more than and aesthetic operation, which would add something nice  to an existence that is more or less complete. It is a new beginning, it is a  rebirth: death and resurrection. Obviously, in the resurrection what was good in  the previous existence re-emerges.<br \/>\nThe third element is this: Matter forms part of the sacrament. Christianity  is not a purely spiritual reality. It involves the body. It involves the cosmos.  It extends to the new earth and the new heavens. Let us return to the last word  of St. Paul&#8217;s text: In this way, he says, we can &#8220;live a new life.&#8221; Element of  an examination of conscience for all of us: to live a new life. This through  baptism.<br \/>\nWe now turn to the sacrament of the Eucharist. I have already  shown in other catecheses with what profound respect St. Paul transmits verbally  the tradition on the Eucharist received from the witnesses themselves of the  last night. He transmits these words with a precious treasure entrusted to his  fidelity. And so we really hear in these words the witnesses of the last night.  We hear the words of the Apostle: &#8220;For I received from the Lord what I also  delivered to you, that the Lord Jesus on the night when he was betrayed took  bread, and when he had given thanks, he broke it, and said, &#8216;This is my body  which is for you. Do this in remembrance of me&#8221; (1 Corinthians 11:23-25). It is  an inexhaustible text. Also here, in this catechesis, I will only make two brief  observations. Paul transmits the Lord&#8217;s words on the chalice thus: this chalice  is &#8220;the new covenant in my blood.&#8221; Hidden in these words is a reference to two  fundamental texts of the Old Testament. The first reference is to the promise of  a new covenant in the book of the prophet Jeremiah. Jesus says to the disciples  and says to us: now, in this hour, with me and with my death the new covenant is  realized; with my blood this new history of humanity begins in the world.  However, present in these words also is a reference to the moment of the  covenant on Sinai, where Moses said: &#8220;Behold the blood of the covenant which the  Lord has made with you in accordance with all these words&#8221; (Exodus 24:8). There  it was a question of the blood of animals. The blood of animals could only be  expression of a desire, the hope of the new sacrifice, of true worship. With the  gift of the chalice the Lord gives us the true sacrifice. The only true  sacrifice is the love of the Son. With the gift of this love, eternal love, the  Word enters into the new covenant. To celebrate the Eucharist means that Christ  gives himself to us, his love, to conform us to himself and thus create the new  world.<br \/>\nThe second important aspect of the doctrine on the Eucharist appears in the  same first Letter to the Corinthians, where Saint Paul says: &#8220;The cup of  blessing which we bless, is it not a participation in the blood of Christ?  Because there is one bread , we who are many are one body, for we all partake of  the one bread.&#8221; (10:16-17). In these words the personal and social character of  the Eucharist also appears. Christ unites himself personally to each one of us,  one with the other. We receive Christ in communion, but Christ unites himself  also in my neighbor. Christ and neighbor are inseparable in the Eucharist. And  thus we are only one bread, only one body. A Eucharist without solidarity with  others is an abuse of the Eucharist. And here we are at the root and at the same  time at the center of the doctrine of the Church as Body of Christ, of the Risen  Christ.<br \/>\nWe also see all the realism of this doctrine. Christ gives us his body in the  Eucharist, he gives himself in his body and so makes us his body, he unites us  to his risen body. If man eats normal bread, this bread in the process of  digestion becomes part of his body, transformed in substance of human life. But  in Holy Communion the inverse process takes place. Christ, the Lord, assimilates  us to himself, introduces us into his glorious Body and so all together we  become his Body. Those who read only Chapter 12 of the First Letter to the  Corinthians and Chapter 12 of the Letter to the Romans might think that the word  on the Body of Christ as organism of the charisms is only a kind of  sociological-theological parable. In fact, in Roman political science this word  of the body with the different members that form a unity was used by the state  itself, to say that the state is an organism in which each one has his function,  the multiplicity and diversity of the functions form a body and each one has its  place. Reading only Chapter 12 of the First Letter to the Corinthians one might  think that Paul limited himself to transfer this to the Church, that this was  only a sociology of the Church. But keeping this 10th chapter in mind we see  that the realism of the Church is very different, much more profound and true  than that of a state-organism. Because Christ really gives us his body and makes  us his body. We are really united with the risen body of Christ, so we are  united to one another. The Church is not just a corporation as the state; it is  a body. It is not simply an organization but a real organism.<\/p>\n<p align=\"left\">\n<\/blockquote>\n<blockquote><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Recent words from the Holy Father: Sandro Magister examines how frequently Benedict has referred to Original Sin of late: He did the same thing at the audience on the following Wednesday, December 10. He had a written text in his hand, but he spoke almost entirely off the cuff. Early in the address he returned&hellip;<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":180,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-951","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v23.9 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/wordpress\/plugins\/seo\/ -->\n<title>Keeping up with Benedict - Via Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Keeping up with Benedict - Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Recent words from the Holy Father: Sandro Magister examines how frequently Benedict has referred to Original Sin of late: He did the same thing at the audience on the following Wednesday, December 10. He had a written text in his hand, but he spoke almost entirely off the cuff. Early in the address he returned&hellip;\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-12-15T11:23:04+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"awelborn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Keeping up with Benedict - Via Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Keeping up with Benedict - Via Media","og_description":"Recent words from the Holy Father: Sandro Magister examines how frequently Benedict has referred to Original Sin of late: He did the same thing at the audience on the following Wednesday, December 10. He had a written text in his hand, but he spoke almost entirely off the cuff. Early in the address he returned&hellip;","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html","og_site_name":"Via Media","article_published_time":"2008-12-15T11:23:04+00:00","author":"awelborn","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html","name":"Keeping up with Benedict - Via Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-12-15T11:23:04+00:00","dateModified":"2008-12-15T11:23:04+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/12\/keeping-up-with-benedict.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Keeping up with Benedict"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/","name":"Via Media","description":"Amy Welborn","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a","name":"awelborn","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","caption":"awelborn"},"description":"Amy Welborn was born in 1960, the only child of a now-retired professor of political science, a teacher-librarian-artist mother,deceased since 2001, was a teacher, librarian and artist. The Catholicism comes from her side. Amy grew up in a number of places - Indiana - Washington, DC - Lubbock Texas - Arlington, Virginia - DeKalb, Illinois - Lawrence, Kansas - and Knoxville, Tennessee, where the family settled in 1973. She attended Knoxville Catholic High School, then the University of Tennessee where she majored in history. She received an MA in Church History from Vanderbilt University, where she wrote a thesis on the changing role of women in 19th century American Protestantism, and the ways Scripture was used to justify those changes. She worked as as a teacher in Catholic high schools and a Parish Director of Religious Education and started writing for the diocesan press - the Florida Catholic - in 1988. Amy has written columns for Our Sunday Visitor and Catholic News Service at times over the past twenty years. Her articles have been published in venues ranging from Our Sunday Visitor to the New York Times to Commonweal. She has written 17 books. 18, if you included the as yet tragically unpublished novel. Amy has five children, ranging in age from 26 to 4 and was married to Michael Dubruiel, who died unexpectedly in February 2009. She lives in Birmingham, Alabama.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/author\/awelborn"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/951","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/180"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=951"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/951\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=951"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=951"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=951"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}