{"id":6735,"date":"2006-07-21T10:27:46","date_gmt":"2006-07-21T10:27:46","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html"},"modified":"2006-07-21T10:27:46","modified_gmt":"2006-07-21T10:27:46","slug":"the-future-of-liberal-catholicism","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html","title":{"rendered":"The Future of Liberal Catholicism"},"content":{"rendered":"

Beliefnet is running a debate\/discussion between two of our friends, Peter Nixon (former independent blogger and now part of the dotCommonweal team blog) and Grant Gallicho (associate editor of Commonweal)<\/a><\/p>\n

Definitions take center stage at first, and I’m thinking this will absorb much of the debate. Peter starts off:<\/p>\n

\n
\n

But today we’re often talking about a more recent strain of liberal Catholicism, one that was inspired by Vatican II and many of the social movements of the 1960s, particularly feminism. Liberal Catholics of this tradition often look back to the history described above for inspiration. In the same way that the Church had to come to terms with the political liberalism of the 18th and 19th centuries, it is suggested that it must eventually come to terms with the social liberalism of the 20th and 21st centuries. <\/p>\n

I will be blunt: I do not see this happening. <\/p>\n

First of all, the Christian denominations that have taken this form of liberalism most to heart are also those that seem to be experiencing a serious crisis of confidence, as evidenced by declining membership, intra-denominational splits over issues like homosexuality, and, in a few cases, increasing discomfort with core Christian beliefs about Jesus Christ and the Trinity. I find it difficult in the face of this evidence to argue that the embrace of this kind of liberalism is a strategy for Christian renewal.<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n

Grant takes issue with definitions: <\/p>\n

\n
\n

Not to be a pedant, but we have a definitional problem here. It\u2019s not too helpful to toss together these discrete and sometimes disparate sources of inspiration for liberal Catholicism. For example, Vatican II gave shape to many Catholics\u2019 growing sense that the laity had something of substance to offer the church. This is something quite different from commitments forged in the social upheaval of the 1960s. <\/p>\n

Whittling down \u201cliberal Catholicism\u201d to the viewpoints of 1960s revolutionaries, however accurate the appellation, or worse, to liberalism itself, doesn\u2019t come close to capturing the diversity of thought that belongs under the heading. As you rightly point out, \u201cliberal Catholicism\u201d is anything but monolithic. (Same goes for \u201cconservative Catholicism.\u201d) <\/p>\n

Yet you seem to mean precisely this band of \u201cliberalizers,\u201d men and women bent on installing married priests, or, worse, women priests, and an \u201centirely new sexual ethic,\u201d when you declare liberal Catholicism defunct. Are there some liberal Catholics who work for those causes? Certainly, although some would call them members of the Catholic left. Do these issues exhaust the scope of liberal Catholicism? Not by a long shot. <\/p>\n

A liberal Catholicism inspired the founders of The Commonweal<\/em> (as it was then known) to publish an independent journal of opinion expressive of \u201cthe Catholic note,\u201d as the editors put it in 1924, with an approach informed by an openness to and engagement with U.S. life and culture. Eighty years later, we think they were on to something, and so do our readers. <\/p>\n

This stance is variously reflected in the lives of regular Catholics. Perhaps you won\u2019t find the same kind of commitment to engagement bubbling in many seminarians today\u2014although they aren\u2019t a monolithic group either. But there is one place you\u2019re sure to find Catholics who live and breathe it daily: the pews. <\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n<\/blockquote>\n

I trust that Grant will expand on his definition, but it seems fairly vague at this point. He seems to be determined to define "liberal Catholicism" not by the usual checklist of "reforms" but by the Church reflecting lay engagement with faith and with the world. <\/p>\n

My questions are: is this a usable definition? If one asked a self-described liberal or progressive Catholic to explain themselves, is this what most of them would say?<\/p>\n

Secondly – so then the "conservative" Catholics are not lay Catholics engaged with the world and determined to live out their faith creatively in that world? <\/p>\n

I’ve said this before, but I don’t think that works, considering that when we look around at what might be called the "conservative" Catholic wing of U.S. Catholicism, we find a whole lot of laity. We find them theologically engaged, employed by the Church, running apostolates and committed to living as faithful disciples in the world as it is. <\/p>\n

So…then….next try?<\/p>\n

(And long-time readers know how I dislike label talk when it comes to Catholicism. I don’t understand why some feel a need to set themselves apart from other Catholics, which is what label talk comes down to, on every side. "I’ll qualify myself just to make sure you understand I’m not in with the other lesser Catholics." But…it will be a discussion interesting to watch. And as we discuss it here, no knee-jerking please. )<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

Beliefnet is running a debate\/discussion between two of our friends, Peter Nixon (former independent blogger and now part of the dotCommonweal team blog) and Grant Gallicho (associate editor of Commonweal) Definitions take center stage at first, and I’m thinking this will absorb much of the debate. Peter starts off: But today we’re often talking about…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":180,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-6735","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nThe Future of Liberal Catholicism - Via Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"The Future of Liberal Catholicism - Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Beliefnet is running a debate\/discussion between two of our friends, Peter Nixon (former independent blogger and now part of the dotCommonweal team blog) and Grant Gallicho (associate editor of Commonweal) Definitions take center stage at first, and I’m thinking this will absorb much of the debate. Peter starts off: But today we’re often talking about…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2006-07-21T10:27:46+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"awelborn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"The Future of Liberal Catholicism - Via Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"The Future of Liberal Catholicism - Via Media","og_description":"Beliefnet is running a debate\/discussion between two of our friends, Peter Nixon (former independent blogger and now part of the dotCommonweal team blog) and Grant Gallicho (associate editor of Commonweal) Definitions take center stage at first, and I’m thinking this will absorb much of the debate. Peter starts off: But today we’re often talking about…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html","og_site_name":"Via Media","article_published_time":"2006-07-21T10:27:46+00:00","author":"awelborn","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html","name":"The Future of Liberal Catholicism - Via Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website"},"datePublished":"2006-07-21T10:27:46+00:00","dateModified":"2006-07-21T10:27:46+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2006\/07\/the-future-of-liberal-catholicism.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"The Future of Liberal Catholicism"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/","name":"Via Media","description":"Amy Welborn","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a","name":"awelborn","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","caption":"awelborn"},"description":"Amy Welborn was born in 1960, the only child of a now-retired professor of political science, a teacher-librarian-artist mother,deceased since 2001, was a teacher, librarian and artist. The Catholicism comes from her side. Amy grew up in a number of places - Indiana - Washington, DC - Lubbock Texas - Arlington, Virginia - DeKalb, Illinois - Lawrence, Kansas - and Knoxville, Tennessee, where the family settled in 1973. She attended Knoxville Catholic High School, then the University of Tennessee where she majored in history. She received an MA in Church History from Vanderbilt University, where she wrote a thesis on the changing role of women in 19th century American Protestantism, and the ways Scripture was used to justify those changes. She worked as as a teacher in Catholic high schools and a Parish Director of Religious Education and started writing for the diocesan press - the Florida Catholic - in 1988. Amy has written columns for Our Sunday Visitor and Catholic News Service at times over the past twenty years. Her articles have been published in venues ranging from Our Sunday Visitor to the New York Times to Commonweal. She has written 17 books. 18, if you included the as yet tragically unpublished novel. Amy has five children, ranging in age from 26 to 4 and was married to Michael Dubruiel, who died unexpectedly in February 2009. She lives in Birmingham, Alabama.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/author\/awelborn"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6735","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/180"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=6735"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/6735\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=6735"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=6735"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=6735"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}