{"id":474,"date":"2008-03-06T13:05:49","date_gmt":"2008-03-06T13:05:49","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/blog.beliefnet.com\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html"},"modified":"2008-03-06T13:05:49","modified_gmt":"2008-03-06T13:05:49","slug":"do-you-remember-rule-27","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html","title":{"rendered":"Do you remember Rule #27?"},"content":{"rendered":"

In case you forgot, here it is:
\nIf the news story is from the British press and involves the Pope….<\/em>
\nDON’T BELIEVE IT.<\/em>
\n(And to refresh your memory, here is John Allen’s column from last year <\/a>highlighting the constant problems with British reporting on Catholic Church matters, especially those involving the Vatican.)
\nWith that in mind, we turn to Richard Owen’s article in the Times <\/em>which breathlessly informs us <\/a><\/p>\n

Pope Benedict XVI is to rehabilitate Martin Luther, arguing that he did not intend to split Christianity but only to purge the Church of corrupt practices.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

Seriously, people. That’s the lede. <\/em>A straightforward assertion.
\nBut what’s the story? The only real story?
\nThat the Pope’s annual gathering with former students\u00a0 – the Sch\u00fclerkreis – <\/strong>is a seminar in which papers are read and discussed. Past topics have included Islam and Creation and Evolution – the papers discussed at the 2006 gathering on that topic will soon be released in book form by Ignatius. <\/a>
\nThis year’s topic will be Luther. Period. Cardinal Kaspar is quoted as saying a few things about Luther that hardly anyone would disagree with\u00a0in Owen’s article, and Owen frames it all in the typical context of the Pope wanting to soften his image and so on, and so on. It’s an amazingly ridiculous article because..remember…this is about….
\n…a seminar\/reunion of Benedict with his former students to discuss interesting issues. It is not an “official” gathering.\u00a0 It is not magisterial. No definitive teaching will come out of it. It’s an intellecutally high-powered Alumni Weekend at Castel Gandalfo.
\nThis kind of reporting is just amazingly irresponsible.\u00a0 The theological and historical issues stemming from Luther and the Reformation are very\u00a0complex and multifaceted, and “rehabilitation” is really not the point.
\nWho knows what will be said about Martin Luther in the future? Who knows what will happen between Catholicism and Lutheranism?
\nI’m sure the Pope has said lots of things about Luther in the past, them both being German and all. Most recently, for example, he mentioned him in Spe Salvi, <\/em><\/a>in this rather dense passage related to the meaning of a verse from Hebrews, “Faith is the substance of things hoped for…”<\/p>\n

7. We must return once more to the New Testament. In the eleventh chapter of the Letter to the Hebrews <\/i>(v. 1) we find a kind of definition of faith which closely links this virtue with hope. Ever since the Reformation there has been a dispute among exegetes over the central word of this phrase, but today a way towards a common interpretation seems to be opening up once more. For the time being I shall leave this central word untranslated. The sentence therefore reads as follows: \u201cFaith is the hypostasis <\/i>of things hoped for; the proof of things not seen\u201d. For the Fathers and for the theologians of the Middle Ages, it was clear that the Greek word hypostasis<\/i> was to be rendered in Latin with the term substantia<\/i>. The Latin translation of the text produced at the time of the early Church therefore reads: Est autem fides sperandarum substantia rerum, argumentum non apparentium<\/i>\u2014faith is the \u201csubstance\u201d of things hoped for; the proof of things not seen. Saint Thomas Aquinas[4<\/a>], using the terminology of the philosophical tradition to which he belonged, explains it as follows: faith is a habitus<\/i>, that is, a stable disposition of the spirit, through which eternal life takes root in us and reason is led to consent to what it does not see. The concept of \u201csubstance\u201d is therefore modified in the sense that through faith, in a tentative way, or as we might say \u201cin embryo\u201d\u2014and thus according to the \u201csubstance\u201d\u2014there are already present in us the things that are hoped for: the whole, true life. And precisely because the thing itself is already present, this presence of what is to come also creates certainty: this \u201cthing\u201d which must come is not yet visible in the external world (it does not \u201cappear\u201d), but because of the fact that, as an initial and dynamic reality, we carry it within us, a certain perception of it has even now come into existence. To Luther, who was not particularly fond of the Letter to the Hebrews<\/i>, the concept of \u201csubstance\u201d, in the context of his view of faith, meant nothing. For this reason he understood the term hypostasis\/substance <\/i>not in the objective sense (of a reality present within us), but in the subjective sense, as an expression of an interior attitude, and so, naturally, he also had to understand the term argumentum<\/i> as a disposition of the subject. In the twentieth century this interpretation became prevalent\u2014at least in Germany\u2014in Catholic exegesis too, so that the ecumenical translation into German of the New Testament, approved by the Bishops, reads as follows: Glaube aber ist: Feststehen in dem, was man erhofft, \u00dcberzeugtsein von dem, was man nicht sieht <\/i>(faith is: standing firm in what one hopes, being convinced of what one does not see). This in itself is not incorrect, but it is not the meaning of the text, because the Greek term used (elenchos<\/i>) does not have the subjective sense of \u201cconviction\u201d but the objective sense of \u201cproof\u201d. Rightly, therefore, recent Protestant exegesis has arrived at a different interpretation: \u201cYet there can be no question but that this classical Protestant understanding is untenable\u201d[5<\/a>]. Faith is not merely a personal reaching out towards things to come that are still totally absent: it gives us something. It gives us even now something of the reality we are waiting for, and this present reality constitutes for us a \u201cproof\u201d of the things that are still unseen. Faith draws the future into the present, so that it is no longer simply a \u201cnot yet\u201d. The fact that this future exists changes the present; the present is touched by the future reality, and thus the things of the future spill over into those of the present and those of the present into those of the future.<\/p><\/blockquote>\n

\u00a0More from Carl Olson. <\/a>This, in particular is helpful:<\/p>\n

Two suggestions: First, go over to the Communio<\/em> website<\/font><\/a> and download a lengthy 1984 interview (PDF format<\/font><\/a>) with Cardinal Ratzinger titled “Luther and the Unity of the Churches”. I’m about a third into it and it is, as usual, it exhibits the sort of careful, exact, and clear thinking for which Ratzinger is rightly renowned. As Fr. Aidan Nichols notes in The Theology of Joseph Ratzinger <\/em>(T&T Clark, 1988), Ratzinger “finds two figures within the Wittenberg Reformer. First, there is the Luther of the Catechisms, the hymns and the liturgical reforms: and this Luther can be received by Catholics whose own biblical and liturgical revivals in this century reproduce many of Luther’s own criticisms of the late medieval Church. But besides this Luther there is also another: the radical theologian and polemicist whose particular version of the doctrine of justification by faith is incompatible with the Catholic understanding of faith as a co-believing with the whole Church, within a Christian existence composed equally of faith, hope, and charity” (p. 276).<\/p><\/blockquote>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"

In case you forgot, here it is: If the news story is from the British press and involves the Pope…. DON’T BELIEVE IT. (And to refresh your memory, here is John Allen’s column from last year highlighting the constant problems with British reporting on Catholic Church matters, especially those involving the Vatican.) With that in…<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":180,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-474","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-news"],"yoast_head":"\nDo you remember Rule #27? - Via Media<\/title>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Do you remember Rule #27? - Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"In case you forgot, here it is: If the news story is from the British press and involves the Pope…. DON’T BELIEVE IT. (And to refresh your memory, here is John Allen’s column from last year highlighting the constant problems with British reporting on Catholic Church matters, especially those involving the Vatican.) With that in…\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"Via Media\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2008-03-06T13:05:49+00:00\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"awelborn\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Do you remember Rule #27? - Via Media","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Do you remember Rule #27? - Via Media","og_description":"In case you forgot, here it is: If the news story is from the British press and involves the Pope…. DON’T BELIEVE IT. (And to refresh your memory, here is John Allen’s column from last year highlighting the constant problems with British reporting on Catholic Church matters, especially those involving the Vatican.) With that in…","og_url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html","og_site_name":"Via Media","article_published_time":"2008-03-06T13:05:49+00:00","author":"awelborn","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html","name":"Do you remember Rule #27? - Via Media","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website"},"datePublished":"2008-03-06T13:05:49+00:00","dateModified":"2008-03-06T13:05:49+00:00","author":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a"},"breadcrumb":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html#breadcrumb"},"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html"]}]},{"@type":"BreadcrumbList","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/2008\/03\/do-you-remember-rule-27.html#breadcrumb","itemListElement":[{"@type":"ListItem","position":1,"name":"Home","item":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia"},{"@type":"ListItem","position":2,"name":"Do you remember Rule #27?"}]},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/","name":"Via Media","description":"Amy Welborn","potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/aea2dcda1635c9c2d6030d9c7595725a","name":"awelborn","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/#\/schema\/person\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-content\/wphb-cache\/gravatar\/9f2\/9f2100183464289fedc5b8a621c15110x96.jpg","caption":"awelborn"},"description":"Amy Welborn was born in 1960, the only child of a now-retired professor of political science, a teacher-librarian-artist mother,deceased since 2001, was a teacher, librarian and artist. The Catholicism comes from her side. Amy grew up in a number of places - Indiana - Washington, DC - Lubbock Texas - Arlington, Virginia - DeKalb, Illinois - Lawrence, Kansas - and Knoxville, Tennessee, where the family settled in 1973. She attended Knoxville Catholic High School, then the University of Tennessee where she majored in history. She received an MA in Church History from Vanderbilt University, where she wrote a thesis on the changing role of women in 19th century American Protestantism, and the ways Scripture was used to justify those changes. She worked as as a teacher in Catholic high schools and a Parish Director of Religious Education and started writing for the diocesan press - the Florida Catholic - in 1988. Amy has written columns for Our Sunday Visitor and Catholic News Service at times over the past twenty years. Her articles have been published in venues ranging from Our Sunday Visitor to the New York Times to Commonweal. She has written 17 books. 18, if you included the as yet tragically unpublished novel. Amy has five children, ranging in age from 26 to 4 and was married to Michael Dubruiel, who died unexpectedly in February 2009. She lives in Birmingham, Alabama.","url":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/author\/awelborn"}]}},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/180"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=474"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/474\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=474"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=474"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.beliefnet.com\/columnists\/viamedia\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=474"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}